- Discuss - lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall
by sadas sadas 21 Dec '09

21 Dec '09

I will explain more deeply. I need to deploy a firewall(s) in front of web server farm because I need to do billing - I will use CentOS with iptables + ipset to store a list if my clients so when client doesn't pay his server's IP is out of the list and he can't access the web server. Second - I know that iptables is very heavy and it's not recommended to use it in gigabit firewall but I don't have a choice as far as I know only ipset works with iptables. I don't know can pf store 500 IPs in one list. Ipset is written for that purpose. I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to forward huge traffic. Any idea? regards I'll second damn near everything nate said, and hopefully add a tidbit or two. If you're new to BSD, you may want to consider the pfsense project in the aforementioned active-active configuration. It gives you a nice, intuitive gui to manage your failover firewalls, if you insist on putting a firewall in front of your web servers. Better to secure the box, leave only the ports you need open on the public interfaces, and don't firewall them. Also, I'd strongly consider running your firewalls with no disk at all. A Live CD, CF card or USB Flash to boot off of, remote syslog and one less subsystem (disks) to buy/fail makes for some mighty cheap 1U servers. A single dual-core with core speeds above 3.0Ghz and 4GB of RAM is to pass Gb @ line rate - ethernet overhead. Truth be told, it's already being done on much less than that. You can also load balance your traffic, albiet somewhat primitively with it. If you really want massive throughput, consider toying around with extremely expensive 10G gear, size RAM appropriately, and see how PF performs under multi-processor, high-core speed. but if you're handling over a Gb of traffic and you can't split the application into multiple farms, that's the best move. Akamai, for instance, runs 10G to each rack, each rack has around 20-24 servers, and they run GB to the server. pfsense.org has extensive information about hardware requirements, features, and what you're looking to do. https://calomel.org/network_performance.html is an excellent BSD firewall performance site. One thing to note, you are claiming to want to deploy this as a passive bridge. You cannot do what you want to do running anything in bridge mode. The packets need to route somehow. Get a /29 from your colo provider and ask to have your existing block routed through it once you've tested it. Another option for a seamless failover, is to alias a different range of IP's to the server interfaces, put a /29 and whatever netblock you want to end up being your public IP block on the PFSense hardware. When you're convinced everything's working through rigorous testing, put a test domain up pointing to that block, modify virtualhost entries on the servers to respond to that domain with your production web site, and test some more. Once you're convinced that's working perfectly, make the changes in DNS to point your production domain at the IP's you want, and failover will happen with DNS convergence. Peter On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:06 AM, nate centos(a)linuxpowered.net > wrote: sadas sadas wrote: > > Hi, > I want to configure CentOS on powerful server with gigabit > adapters as transparent bridge and deploy it in front of server farm. > Can you tell how to optimize the OS for hight packet processing? What > configurations I need to do to achieve very hight speeds and thousands of > packets? iptables makes a TERRIBLE firewall, use pf instead http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html Also consider how your going to provide redundancy, if you have a web server farm you want to protect them with at least two firewalls, not one. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html I haven't used CARP myself but did setup a pair of pf firewalls about 5 years ago in a large network in bridging mode, the layer 3 fault tolerance was provided by OSPF on the core switches, the firewalls were active-active(with pfsync) since they were layer 2 only. Maybe someday linux will fix the overly complex iptables system to something that is more manageable, not holding my breath though. If you want really high speed(say multi GbE) though you'll want/need to go with an appliance based solution. Also since your referring to a web server farm, it is perfectly acceptable to not use firewalls these days, if you have a good load balancer that serves the same role as a firewall in that it only passes traffic that you specifically configure it to pass. Also in high traffic environments the performance of load balancers destroys most firewalls, making investing in a high end firewall a very expensive proposition. I've worked for the better part of the last 10 years with companies who did not have firewalls in front of their web servers for this reason, it didn't make sense $ wise, because the benefit wasn't there, and the added complexity, and performance implications wasn't worth it either. Talk to most load balancing companies and they'll tell you this themselves. nate

7 10

Re: [CentOS] Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall
by sadas sadas 21 Dec '09

21 Dec '09

What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice? >>> I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective >>> firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to >>> forward huge traffic. Any idea? >> >> Hundreds? >> >> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html >> >> "A table is used to hold a group of IPv4 and/or IPv6 addresses. Lookups >> against a table are very fast and consume less memory and processor time >> than lists. For this reason, a table is ideal for holding a large group of >> addresses as the lookup time on a table holding 50,000 addresses is only >> slightly more than for one holding 50 addresses. Tables can be used in the >> following ways: >> >> * source and/or destination address in filter, NAT, and redirection rules. >> * translation address in NAT rules. >> * redirection address in redirection rules. >> * destination address in route-to, reply-to, and dup-to filter rule >> options." >> >> nuff said ? >> >> I love linux, I've been using it for almost 15 years now, I absolutely >> hate iptables(and ipchains, and ipfwadm). By contrast I absolutely >> hate everything about OpenBSD except for pf(which I love, ipfw and >> ipf aren't too bad either, at least for the era), so I use OpenBSD >> for firewalls, and linux for everything else. > >I can back this; during 2009, I deployed a bunch of load balancers >running OpenBSD (using pf, carpd, and relayd). I used to be a super die >hard BSD guy, but through the years and having used/deployed/propagated >NetBSD, then FreeBSD, then OpenBSD, then NetBSD again, I took one of my >usual once-a-year looks at GNU/Linux (this time, it was CentOS, after >having worked with RHEL for some years), I got settled here. > >Long story short: I'd really recommend OpenBSD for your task. iptables >really sucks. I recently deployed some machines running several virtual >instances (however still the cheapest *proven* way to get several IP >stacks in Linux) doing L2 routing, I threw iptables off of that machines >because it just can't handle stuff at that rate. OpenBSD rocks, I even >have a setup running (active-active, load balanced) at about 40Mbps >using Alix boards [0] -- they rock, and they are no way busy. > >OpenBSDs documentation is the best out there, it's documentational >quality is what I really really badly miss in the Linux world. However, >the community is a bunch of (sorry in advance) assholes. But this is >well known throughout the internet, so: You have been warned. Great >product, totally lame vendor. ;) > >Timo > >[0] -- http://pcengines.ch/alix.htm > >> nate >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

9 9

Re: [CentOS] Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall
by sadas sadas 21 Dec '09

21 Dec '09

>I've been using Linux (CentOS5) on gigabit firewalls, for thousands of >users. No problems. > >Just make sure ip_conntrack_max is big enough, so you don't run out of >connections. > >There are other things to tune to optimize the performance, but it's >certainly doable with linux+iptables. > >-- Pasi > Would you provide us information about how the firewalls are configured, the hardware, the total bandwidth passing the firewall in each direction and the connections in the busiest hours. regards

1 0

Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall
by sadas sadas 21 Dec '09

21 Dec '09

Hi, I want to configure CentOS on powerful server with gigabit adapters as transparent bridge and deploy it in front of server farm. Can you tell how to optimize the OS for hight packet processing? What configurations I need to do to achieve very hight speeds and thousands of packets?

7 6

Re: [CentOS] Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall
by sadas sadas 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

What solution for gigabit firewall can you suggest? Witch OS and packet filter is capable to atcheave hight performance and gigabit speeds? >Les Mikesell wrote: >> Timo Schoeler wrote: >>>> What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out >>>> there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice? >>> NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSDs out >>> there); however, as can be read on >>> >>> http://www.netbsd.org/docs/network/pf.html >>> >>> there's the 'usual lag': OpenBSD implements feature X in 4.6, wait some >>> time to see it implemented elsewhere. >>> >>> One of the biggest strengths of OpenBSD is that it's really a completely >>> rounded piece of work. Keep it that way. pf will perform best on >>> OpenBSD, with all the nice features it has. >> >> Has anyone used Firewall Builder to create a complex set of iptables >> rules? Or compared performance where it built the same thing for >> linux/iptables and bsd/pf? >> > > >Are you joking? That piece of crap just puts everything into one single >chain. I never EVER use Firewall Builder after I saw the results the >first time. > >For a BRIDGING firewall, there is absolutely NO WAY that Linux/netfilter >can keep up with OpenBSD/pf. I doubt that Linux/netfilter can even reach >half the performance of OpenBSD/pf. >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

4 6

Supsend/hibernate on Samsung NC10
by Mathieu Baudier 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

Hi, I cannot have suspend and hibernate working on a Samsung NC10 (netbook) running CentOS 5.4 i386. When I try suspending/hibernating the screen becomes black (with a few logs, like "shrinking memory" for hibernate) and then the computer hangs and I have to force a shutdown with the power button. This wiki page seems to say that it should work out of the box: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Samsung/NC10 I tried to add the kernel arguments described here, to no avail: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-June/040633.html Anyhow the problems doesn't seem to be the resume but rather getting into the suspended/hibernated state. When I log after a failed attempt, GNOME shows a popup saying that apparently we failed to recover from a suspend/hibernate state and that this may be a driver problem. A few more information about my settings which may be useful: - the root filesystem is installed on an LVM - I use the NetworkManager and not the network service - I disabled bluetooth (in order to remove all unused devices that may impact this problem) - [mbaudier@localhost ~]$ lshal | grep suspen org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.SystemPowerManagement.method_execpaths = {'hal-system-power-suspend', 'hal-system-power-suspend-clear-error', 'hal-system-power-hibernate', 'hal-system-power-hibernate-clear-error', 'hal-system-power-shutdown', 'hal-system-power-reboot', 'hal-system-power-set-power-save'} (string list) power_management.can_suspend_to_disk = true (bool) power_management.can_suspend_to_ram = true (bool) power_management.can_suspend = true (bool) Thanks in advance if somebody can tell me how I can analyse further / solve this. Cheers, Mathieu

2 1

mdadm help
by James Bensley 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

Hey List, So I had a 4 drive software RAID 5 set up consisting of /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1, /dev/sdd1 and /dev/sde1. I reinstalled my OS and after the reinstall I made the mistake of re-assembling the array incorrectly by typing "sudo mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde" in a moment of stupidity. Obviously this didn't work and the array wouldn't mount and after a short period I realised my mistake and re-issuing the same command but specifying each drive partition (sdb1, sdc1 etc) instead of the drives (sdb, sdc etc) meant the raid would assembled and mount just dandy. My problem is that when I issue "sudo mdadm -E --scan" I get the following results: ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=4 UUID=fde94900:3f3f3bf6:e368bf24:bd0fce41 ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=4 UUID=3a2f1919:52f73b40:e368bf24:bd0fce41 These entries aren't in mdadm.conf but mdadm keeps picking up my first mistake and tries to make a raid out of my four drives and not the four partitions (the bottom line is the four UUIDs for the partitions on each drive, the top line is the four UUID for the drives). So now every time I restart the machine, the array isn't mounted because mdadm (I guess) doesn't know what to do as it has two sets of devices defined as /dev/md0. I can issues "sudo mdadm --stop /dev/md0" and "sudo mdadm --remove /dev/md0" and then re-assemble specifying the four partitions and carry on as normal but I can't work out how to tell mdadm to "forget" about the the top line of those results, if that makes any sence? I have removed the entries from fstab and from mdadm.conf so when I boot up the machine doesn't automatically try and mount the incorrect device but I still can't remove the top line from the results of "mdadm -E --scan" no matter what I do. I have rebooted and issued the command "sudo mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1" and I can mount my array as normal but I was hoping that now there wouldn't be a clash in the results of "sudo mdadm -E --scan" (which there isn't, the second lines says "/dev/md1"), meaning that after a reboot the array would mount properly but that isn't the case. It is still trying to assemble the top line. Does anyone have any idea how I can rectify this? Thanks for reading. -- Regards, James ;) Ted Turner - "Sports is like a war without the killing." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/ted_turner.html

1 1

Removable drive configuration
by Bob McConnell 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

I have a box running CentOS 5.3 with two Dataport removable drive bays installed on the second IDE interface (/dev/hdc and hdd). I want to configure it so I can plug in and mount various drives at different times, including different size drives. So far it will only recognize the first drive I plug in, and only if I boot the box after inserting the drive. Is there any way to set it up so I can mount different size drives freely without having to reboot each time? Thank you, Bob McConnell N2SPP

3 2

Re: [CentOS] Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall
by sadas sadas 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

The syntax is not a problem. The problem is in the performance. I suppose that if I configure OpenBSD to process the in/out packets only to layer 2 the performance will be much more than linux with iptables. >> I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in >> bare stock PF without the gui in front of it is about as easy as it gets. > >IPTALES is the same; > >iptables -A [INPUT/FORWARD] -d -j [REJECT/DROP] > >> The PF configuration file syntax was designed from the ground up to be >> sane, unlike iptables, which typically needs some decent sysadmin scripting >> or using fwbuilder to make any good sense of. > >I beg to differ here. IPTABLES is not that hard when you understand it. Like >anything else, once you know what you are doing it isn't that hard. And no, >I have never used any GUI program to configure my firewalls. > >> There is no finer opensource firewall product on the market, in terms of >> performance, ease of configuration and use, and other issues. > >This is all subjective to the user. I would say that PF is a nightmare and >IPTABLES is easier to use. > >> If you're not opposed to vi, for what you're looking to accomplish, moving >> to BSD and pf is a no-brainer. PF can definitely handle a list of 500 >> hosts and anything else you've mentioned. It's absolutely capable, easier, >> and in general, for anything that involves packet filtering at all, about >> as good as it gets. > >Again this is all subjective to the user. > > >-- > >Regards >Robert > >Linux User #296285 >http://counter.li.org >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

4 4

xen domu not starting
by Peter Peltonen 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

After running out of swap and memory and freezing, a domU called web02 won't start up. Both dom0 and domU are running CentOS release 5.4. dom0's kernel is 2.6.18-164.el5xen and I'm running the stock xen from CentOS: xen-3.0.3-94.el5 After issuing 'xen create web02' I see the following in the xen console: Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) vmalloc area: ee000000-f4ffe000, maxmem 2d800000 Memory: 1031328k/1056768k available (1478k kernel code, 16784k reserved, 548k data, 132k init, 311296k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized SELinux: Initializing. selinux_register_security: Registering secondary module capability Capability LSM initialized as secondary Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K CPU: L2 cache: 6144K Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. CPU 1 irqstacks, hard=c0344000 soft=c0324000 Brought up 1 CPUs checking if image is initramfs... it is Freeing initrd memory: 1232k freed Grant table initialized NET: Registered protocol family 16 Initializing CPU#1 Brought up 2 VCPUs But after that it just hangs. SSH won't respond either. 'xm list' shows: web02 25 1023 2 -b---- 0.9 All I see in dom0's xend log is: Dec 20 13:18:10 kr kernel: device vif25.0 entered promiscuous mode Dec 20 13:18:10 kr kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): vif25.0: link is not ready Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: blkback: ring-ref 8, event-channel 9, protocol 1 (x86_32-abi) Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): vif25.0: link becomes ready Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: xenbr0: topology change detected, propagating Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: xenbr0: port 5(vif25.0) entering forwarding state In dom0's /var/log/messages I see: Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: blkback: ring-ref 8, event-channel 9, protocol 1 (x86_32-abi) Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): vif25.0: link becomes ready Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: xenbr0: topology change detected, propagating Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: xenbr0: port 5(vif25.0) entering forwarding state xm dmesg reports nothing unusual except these at the end: (XEN) mm.c:649:d22 Error getting mfn 3b6 (pfn 55555555) from L1 entry 00000000003b6025 for dom22 (XEN) mm.c:3341:d22 ptwr_emulate: fixing up invalid PAE PTE 00000000003b6025 But I've no idea when those messages have been created. I've disabled selinux in dom0. Other domUs are running fine, although I haven't tried rebooting them. Any ideas what could be wrong with the domU? Regards, Peter

1 0

unverified files in 5.4
by ken 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

Hey, Gang! To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this: rpm -Vv util-linux .... ........ /usr/bin/cal S.?..... /usr/bin/chfn ........ /usr/bin/chrt S.?..... /usr/bin/chsh .... Does anyone else get this? And what would be the proper course of action at this point? Thanks mucho. -- Without music, life would be a mistake. --Friedrich Nietzsche

2 3

Evolution search menu
by Frank Cox 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

When I switched my main desktop computer from Fedora to Centos, I moved my email from Sylpheed to Evolution. (Reason: Sylpheed for Centos doesn't boldface unread messages in the message list box and newer Sylpheed versions won't compile on Centos.) Evolution works fine, but I can't figure out how to get rid of the "previous/next" buttons that appear at the bottom of the Evolution window after I do a search. Detail: I enter a search term in the "Search" box over the message list. Two buttons "previous" and "next", plus a "match case" checkbox and "Matches: X" (where X is the number of matches found in the message) appear at the bottom of the Evolution window, just below the message text. That bar is fine while I'm doing the searching, but the only way I can get rid of that after I complete my search is to exit and re-load Evolution. Is there another way to get rid of it? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

1 0

Donation programme
by Yves Bellefeuille 19 Dec '09

19 Dec '09

Is there any decision about the donation programme? The Web page still says: "If you are looking to make a cash dontation to the CentOS Project, please check back here after August 15th, 2009." I assume that donations aren't refused, but is there a suggested amount, as there used to be? -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan(a)storm.ca> "Yves Bellefeuille: Eterna malvenkanto en UEA" -- Heroldo Komunikas, n-ro 389

4 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 58, Issue 6
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 19 Dec '09

19 Dec '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:1671 Important CentOS 4 i386 kernel - security and bug fix update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2009:1671 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 kernel - security and bug fix update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2009:1673 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey - security update (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2009:1673 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2009:1674 Critical CentOS 4 i386 firefox - security update (Tru Huynh) 6. CESA-2009:1674 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security update (Tru Huynh) 7. CESA-2009:1680 Important CentOS 4 i386 xpdf - security update (Tru Huynh) 8. CESA-2009:1680 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 xpdf - security update (Tru Huynh) 9. CESA-2009:1681 Important CentOS 4 i386 gpdf - security update (Tru Huynh) 10. CESA-2009:1681 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 gpdf - security update (Tru Huynh) 11. CESA-2009:1682 Important CentOS 4 i386 kdegraphics - security update (Tru Huynh) 12. CESA-2009:1682 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 kdegraphics - security update (Tru Huynh) 13. CESA-2009:1648 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 ntp Update (Karanbir Singh) 14. CESA-2009:1648 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 ntp Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:00:39 +0100 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1671 Important CentOS 4 i386 kernel - security and bug fix update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218190039.GA18708(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1671 kernel security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1671.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-xenU-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-doc-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.noarch.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update kernel\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

DRBD
by Scott McClanahan 19 Dec '09

19 Dec '09

Would any of you be comfortable running the drbd packages from the extras repo? If so, any particular version .. I notice 8.0, 8.2, 8.3. I'll do my own due diligence but just curious if the list has any implementation based feedback. Thanks.

4 3

google gears on 64 bit centos 5.4?
by Dave 19 Dec '09

19 Dec '09

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I have google gears installed on our 64bit firefoxes on firefox 3.5.5 in > centos 5.4 with flash 10 - all from rpm ;) > > Works very nicely...... Sorry, I think I am missing something. What is the rpm/package called? So is it i386 installed on x8664, or what? Google's website still claims it requires a 32 bit OS.

2 3

don't understand this command
by adrian kok 19 Dec '09

19 Dec '09

Hi I mistype this shell#/rm a.tar.gz it works but it won't confirm and the file is remove why? Thank you Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

3 2

yum quit working in CentOS 5.4 x86_64
by David McGuffey 19 Dec '09

19 Dec '09

Have been running 5.4 x86_64 for a couple of months now. Every once in a while, I would get a notice that updates were available. It appears that about 3 weeks ago, yum stopped notifying me of updates. Over that time, I've manually done a 'yum update' from a command line, with an output that there are no updates. I know this cannot be true, because I watch the 'centOS-announce Digest' messages come through and see that there are updates for my installation. I tried 'yum clean all' followed by another 'yum update' and still no updates are listed as available. I have the priorities plugin installed and here is the output I get: [root@desk ~]# yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: ftp.lug.udel.edu * base: mirror.rackspace.com * centosplus: mirrors.netdna.com * extras: ftp.lug.udel.edu * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net * updates: mirrors.adams.net 598 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update [root@desk ~]# Here is the contents of CentOS-Base.repo: [root@desk yum.repos.d]# cat CentOS-Base.repo # CentOS-Base.repo # # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the # update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to and # geographically close to the client. You should use this for CentOS updates # unless you are manually picking other mirrors. # # If the mirrorlist= does not work for you, as a fall back you can try the # remarked out baseurl= line instead. # # [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch= $basearch&repo=os #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=1 #released updates [updates] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch= $basearch&repo=updates #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=1 #packages used/produced in the build but not released [addons] name=CentOS-$releasever - Addons mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch= $basearch&repo=addons #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/addons/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=1 #additional packages that may be useful [extras] name=CentOS-$releasever - Extras mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch= $basearch&repo=extras #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/extras/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=1 #additional packages that extend functionality of existing packages [centosplus] name=CentOS-$releasever - Plus mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch= $basearch&repo=centosplus #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/centosplus/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=2 #contrib - packages by Centos Users [contrib] name=CentOS-$releasever - Contrib mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch= $basearch&repo=contrib #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/contrib/$basearch/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=2 [root@desk yum.repos.d]# What is wrong? DaveM

3 4

NIS failover
by Jason Pyeron 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed. It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind restart. It behaves as indicated in http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5084845 using ypbind-1.17.2-13 on Centos 4.5 / Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Nov 2 12:38:56 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4858192 Any advice? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

11 13

mountd and statd at specific ports - nfs firewall
by Carlos Santana 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Hi, I am configuring firewall for NFS. I see that statd and mountd start at random port. Is there any way to force it to start at specific port each time. The '-p ' option would work, but how do I configure it to start at specific port number each time. I mean where do statd and mountd look for default configuration options? Any clues? - CS.

2 2

Re: [CentOS] Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall
by sadas sadas 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

after quick search in google: http://postfactum.pl.ua/pf/ I will test to patch latest linux kernel with pf. What do you thing? >sadas sadas wrote: > >> I can't find information is there linux or BSD distribution with effective >> firewall that uses optimized algorithm to store hundreds of IPs and to >> forward huge traffic. Any idea? > >Hundreds? > >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tables.html > >"A table is used to hold a group of IPv4 and/or IPv6 addresses. Lookups >against a table are very fast and consume less memory and processor time >than lists. For this reason, a table is ideal for holding a large group of >addresses as the lookup time on a table holding 50,000 addresses is only >slightly more than for one holding 50 addresses. Tables can be used in the >following ways: > > * source and/or destination address in filter, NAT, and redirection rules. > * translation address in NAT rules. > * redirection address in redirection rules. > * destination address in route-to, reply-to, and dup-to filter rule >options." > >nuff said ? > >I love linux, I've been using it for almost 15 years now, I absolutely >hate iptables(and ipchains, and ipfwadm). By contrast I absolutely >hate everything about OpenBSD except for pf(which I love, ipfw and >ipf aren't too bad either, at least for the era), so I use OpenBSD >for firewalls, and linux for everything else. > >nate > > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

6 6

Fetchmail question
by Davy Leon 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Hi folks This question is about fetchmail running on my Centos 5.3 box. I need to fetch my email from different accounts living on remote servers and drop it on my local mailbox. The question is wich way is faster for fetchmail... using POP3 or IMAP? Thanks David

6 11

Security advice, please
by Anne Wilson 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

I run chkrootkit daily. For the first time I've got reports of a problem - Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 1008) The page http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/checking-bindshell-infected- ports-1008/ suggests that this might be a false positive, so I ran 'netstat - tanup' but unlike the report, it wasn't famd on the port. It was tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:1008 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3797/rpc.mountd It looks as though certain services are marked as suspicious when they grab port 1008. I tried to find how to restart the service, but without success, but a reboot put rpc.mountd onto another port, and chkrootkit no longer reports a problem. (I had rebooted last evening after an update including a kernel version.) I think that it really was a false alarm, but I would really like to know how I could restart that service without rebooting. system-config-services didn't do the trick, and I simply didn't know what else to try. In case I meet this again, can you please advise me? Anne -- KDE Community Working Group New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org

4 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 58, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2009:1641 CentOS 5 i386 samba Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CEBA-2009:1641 CentOS 5 x86_64 samba Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CESA-2009:1625 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 expat Update (Karanbir Singh) 4. CESA-2009:1625 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 expat Update (Karanbir Singh) 5. CESA-2009:1642 Important CentOS 5 i386 acpid Update (Karanbir Singh) 6. CESA-2009:1642 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 acpid Update (Karanbir Singh) 7. CESA-2009:1646 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 libtool Update (Karanbir Singh) 8. CESA-2009:1646 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 libtool Update (Karanbir Singh) 9. CEBA-2009:1645 CentOS 5 x86_64 device-mapper-multipath Update (Karanbir Singh) 10. CEBA-2009:1645 CentOS 5 i386 device-mapper-multipath Update (Karanbir Singh) 11. CEBA-2009:1664 CentOS 5 x86_64 vsftpd Update (Karanbir Singh) 12. CEBA-2009:1664 CentOS 5 i386 vsftpd Update (Karanbir Singh) 13. CEBA-2009:1668 CentOS 5 i386 openssh Update (Karanbir Singh) 14. CEBA-2009:1668 CentOS 5 x86_64 openssh Update (Karanbir Singh) 15. CESA-2009:1659 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 kvm Update (Karanbir Singh) 16. CESA-2009:1674 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update (Karanbir Singh) 17. CESA-2009:1674 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:30:22 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1641 CentOS 5 i386 samba Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218013022.GA25453(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1641 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1641.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 981538b986543ca13f301eade934817c samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.i386.rpm f1a3821b13c5e294fe854a5177f4e4c0 samba-client-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.i386.rpm f62bca30ab10982dd6c530df663c3dab samba-common-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 5fa2c978cfa6b3a08a3e20f147c19488 samba-swat-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.i386.rpm Source: b26bc4ba43a2fe3785789a8789989674 samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:30:22 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1641 CentOS 5 x86_64 samba Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218013022.GA25468(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1641 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1641.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 34b9389bae34cd80b3bc8dd64edca190 samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 6b65931f7bc500fbd7fb87eac8a7ec15 samba-client-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 6da7bb85391bad3ff91de630f84b8b0f samba-common-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.i386.rpm b6ebf87116f22323bc30c48991b8a8c4 samba-common-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 23ef1c00554ecba7931e0ab487b3910f samba-swat-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: b26bc4ba43a2fe3785789a8789989674 samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:32:48 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1625 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 expat Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218013248.GA25587(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1625 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1625.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 966bf90b58dc3cb0af1806b402def6cd expat-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 81ac5f28117ee422e938f86dd83d452d expat-devel-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.i386.rpm Source: 2b584732230d59f4097200c9a0c1fbc6 expat-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:32:48 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1625 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 expat Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218013248.GA25601(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1625 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1625.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c9bde6b01cd6559797c328df45a1364b expat-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.i386.rpm c80500d718dce74d61508c3a53b230cd expat-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 08ef1a2987b5fbb52170a7eca35ed5fb expat-devel-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 276c31926d7323bc15823acda88158ae expat-devel-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 2b584732230d59f4097200c9a0c1fbc6 expat-1.95.8-8.3.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:36:56 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1642 Important CentOS 5 i386 acpid Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218013656.GA25741(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1642 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1642.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 677623acd078e86a875c8e3c889bcae8 acpid-1.0.4-9.el5_4.1.i386.rpm Source: 3d24445c2a5abaa7374136ba964c20d0 acpid-1.0.4-9.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:36:56 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1642 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 acpid Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218013656.GA25755(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1642 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1642.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 986d10013f76a6a20266a260d6c7e127 acpid-1.0.4-9.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 3d24445c2a5abaa7374136ba964c20d0 acpid-1.0.4-9.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:40:41 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1646 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 libtool Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014041.GA26043(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1646 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1646.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 5f36cc6a81d5610b0cd5b6b446905f93 libtool-1.5.22-7.el5_4.x86_64.rpm e062512dacf5c4d800d7338f939a2db1 libtool-ltdl-1.5.22-7.el5_4.i386.rpm 797527099c1b81a6ccc6eced761840d9 libtool-ltdl-1.5.22-7.el5_4.x86_64.rpm 33b3801f451b7cb736249636c952c604 libtool-ltdl-devel-1.5.22-7.el5_4.i386.rpm e87163b7bd7f32b455136ed1da4b05fc libtool-ltdl-devel-1.5.22-7.el5_4.x86_64.rpm Source: 70f9209eec8f08f7f45cb64a5b2f106d libtool-1.5.22-7.el5_4.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:40:41 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1646 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 libtool Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014041.GA26028(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1646 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1646.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 5668e4b56c60ae6b4edd1a119d0a0de9 libtool-1.5.22-7.el5_4.i386.rpm d832a0ca3aaf6212c4ac3429592a9ad9 libtool-ltdl-1.5.22-7.el5_4.i386.rpm bbfe4f990ef334ea6cbcf7eb65df6a00 libtool-ltdl-devel-1.5.22-7.el5_4.i386.rpm Source: 70f9209eec8f08f7f45cb64a5b2f106d libtool-1.5.22-7.el5_4.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:46:13 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1645 CentOS 5 x86_64 device-mapper-multipath Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014613.GA26412(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1645 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1645.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 15d1f406fc5c52ebb8779cb56fe3c38c device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-30.el5_4.4.x86_64.rpm 8d3dba1651b55434d575814a26866edf kpartx-0.4.7-30.el5_4.4.x86_64.rpm Source: a34e12c33b6da923331392da382adebc device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-30.el5_4.4.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:46:13 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1645 CentOS 5 i386 device-mapper-multipath Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014613.GA26397(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1645 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1645.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 6c06a493c2408d4f0198f5c72a638fcb device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-30.el5_4.4.i386.rpm 8228482d5452e8c2f84cf3702cca1a61 kpartx-0.4.7-30.el5_4.4.i386.rpm Source: a34e12c33b6da923331392da382adebc device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-30.el5_4.4.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:47:31 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1664 CentOS 5 x86_64 vsftpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014731.GA26485(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1664 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1664.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 200998deb87f753d2a355bd742671724 vsftpd-2.0.5-16.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 176557c19000e9e2fc9931b4369a764d vsftpd-2.0.5-16.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:47:31 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1664 CentOS 5 i386 vsftpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014731.GA26472(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1664 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1664.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 293b4f81048f0dd43d54ff443f6afc22 vsftpd-2.0.5-16.el5_4.1.i386.rpm Source: 176557c19000e9e2fc9931b4369a764d vsftpd-2.0.5-16.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:49:10 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1668 CentOS 5 i386 openssh Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014910.GA26565(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1668 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1668.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: cfd7486bce0ab9ceb412453548c94082 openssh-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.i386.rpm 456a811a9fd2bd63122dea1a1e6b379b openssh-askpass-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.i386.rpm 194d7293c5ace68a6347e391a24129e3 openssh-clients-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.i386.rpm 594cea77de34d67e48051477066d2299 openssh-server-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.i386.rpm Source: a2dbcfbd15af264ac1a324e14adbfc24 openssh-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:49:10 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1668 CentOS 5 x86_64 openssh Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218014910.GA26578(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1668 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1668.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 6a547a12773474110f1ed1b92a744eb3 openssh-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.x86_64.rpm 4bd4c6c5ab56e79c6d64c0538679f065 openssh-askpass-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.x86_64.rpm fcad0e7590b4581194b95ef9c4290a26 openssh-clients-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.x86_64.rpm 3de4e9a88c5ada00bff17ccfc35a12cf openssh-server-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.x86_64.rpm Source: a2dbcfbd15af264ac1a324e14adbfc24 openssh-4.3p2-36.el5_4.3.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:52:42 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1659 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 kvm Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218015242.GA26671(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1659 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1659.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: dd89f29fbde376a0be204f6367ab1705 kmod-kvm-83-105.el5_4.13.x86_64.rpm 6daa2b2410fe160ed0399e87940bd587 kvm-83-105.el5_4.13.x86_64.rpm f162e539e217f03fc310ed80be0131db kvm-qemu-img-83-105.el5_4.13.x86_64.rpm bddc9b7b3f26305db78a001a105bfce6 kvm-tools-83-105.el5_4.13.x86_64.rpm Source: 2f01ee6d02f77a3ef7a0b85c2a02bb80 kvm-83-105.el5_4.13.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:04:10 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1674 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218020410.GA26807(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1674 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1674.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: af7074622b5ffdfb06b16fa5759bb26c firefox-3.0.16-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm c5de482f1e7c012bf24104cd1a31e15c xulrunner-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.i386.rpm 368d393555d79ee3d84a1fead4b4e8fe xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.i386.rpm 511bd8a9692dc23698eb15f00b93a623 xulrunner-devel-unstable-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.i386.rpm Source: e8f67a8c88dae6a12323d80f20c36efc firefox-3.0.16-1.el5.centos.src.rpm 5f31e6a4ea0568903ac2ee394e4fcf5b xulrunner-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:04:11 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1674 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091218020411.GA26823(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1674 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1674.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 05b56f0e64b20b2712ffe9ff026264ef firefox-3.0.16-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm df4cd89a700cfb71936bf80d6abbe572 firefox-3.0.16-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 9bf12b49d3ae3c25c5a81324a4937eeb xulrunner-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.i386.rpm 39a8f64964f0ab00470c7b37f3e22177 xulrunner-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.x86_64.rpm 1041981d81616917d900487466b08db2 xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.i386.rpm 0507ebdf494308d677b6f77ef0dcd2fe xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.x86_64.rpm a1fe148fcea6a1316dfa878171589bd7 xulrunner-devel-unstable-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.x86_64.rpm Source: e8f67a8c88dae6a12323d80f20c36efc firefox-3.0.16-1.el5.centos.src.rpm 5f31e6a4ea0568903ac2ee394e4fcf5b xulrunner-1.9.0.16-2.el5_4.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 58, Issue 5 **********************************************

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Fetchmail question
by Bo Lynch 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

On Fri, December 18, 2009 10:29 am, Davy Leon wrote: > Hi folks > > This question is about fetchmail running on my Centos 5.3 box. > I need to fetch my email from different accounts living on remote servers > and drop it on my local mailbox. > The question is wich way is faster for fetchmail... using POP3 or IMAP? > > Thanks > > David __________________ POP3 is the way to go for this situation. Its also a bit easier to use than IMAP. Bo Lynch

1 0

NTP update?
by Gilbert Sebenste 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Excellent. We're all caught up on updates now, except... I didn't see the NTP update. That's a big one, with an easy denial of sservice attack. Is that planning to be released? I know there was an issue with it for awhile... ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** *******************************************************************************

4 4

i386 and x86_64 packages on an 64bit system after fresh install - why?
by Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Hi, I recetly set up a brand new fres Centos 5.4 64 bit system and found a lot of i386 packages installed along with the x86_64 packages. My questions: Why is this done? May I remove the i386 packages? (rpm -e ....) I wanted to update today the installed packages and do get some dep messages: --> Finished Dependency Resolution glibc-2.5-42.i686 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.5-42 is needed by package glibc-2.5-42.i686 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.5-42 is needed by package glibc-2.5-42.i686 (installed) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package. Thanks for any suggestion and best regards, Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reinicke(a)filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. Claudia Hübner Staatsrätin für Demographischen Wandel und für Senioren im Staatsministerium Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt

2 2

latest kernel (-164.9.1) not seen by yum
by Rob Kampen 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

I have updated my local repo and see that centos.plus has the new kernel available. yum update does not get it yum clean all and another try and still it does not find it what am I missing?? only recent change to yum.repos was the addition of failovermethod=priority anyone else having probs? flummoxed at this point

2 2

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
by Thomas Dukes 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 3:22 AM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Thomas Dukes > >Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:53 AM > >To: 'CentOS mailing list' > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request > > > >We have backups but its only database files. C-Systems got us good, > >but > its > >our fault for relying on a 12 year old server. Their newer > sytems run > >on fedora 9 and we may have to bite the bullet for a new > server. Maybe > >we can patch this one up till spring. > > Fedora?? You're joking, right? > > This is this a production server? That's pretty much what I told c-systems on the phone!

1 0

gcc version
by Andrea Laack 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Why is redhat version 5.3 running gcc version 4.3 and centos 5.4 running gcc version 4.1.2? When will gcc be upgraded on centos? Thanks Andrea -- ************************************************** Andrea Laack IS Manager Functional Imaging Research Center Medical College of Wisconsin 8701 Watertown Plank Road Milwaukee, WI 53226 414-456-4661

5 5

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
by John R. Dennison 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Fedora?? You're joking, right? > > This is this a production server? Note he mentioned Fedora 9, support for which has been EOL'd how long ago? :( John -- If the world were a village of 100 people .... 6 people (all in the USA) would own 59% of all the village's wealth, 74 people would share another 39%, and 20 people would share the remaining 2%. -- David Copeland, in Value Earth

2 1

PHP-5.3 in Centos 5.4
by For＠ll 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Hi, I'm looking for a repository of PHP-5.3 compatible with the requirements of Zend http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/requirements.html requirements.extensions, repos are being upgraded, that repo is exist or any way is a compilation of php from source? For@ll

5 4

Help With Glade and C5 64-bit?
by Scott Ehrlich 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

I have a user with C5.4 64-bit, fully updated, performed a yum install glade, it claimed to have installed everything, but we cannot get it to run. Neither whereis nor locate revleal an executable. We obtained the latest glade source from the project's web site, attempted to configure it, until it complained of needed dependencies, namely gtk+ (newer than what was on the system). So I got the newest source from the gtk project web site, tried to compile it, until it complained of at least needing a newer glib. So I grabbed the newest glib, compiled and installed, ran ldd, and tried gtk+ source compile again. I still claimed glib wasn't new enough. What am I missing? I followed the glade install notes as best I could. Thanks for any help/insight. If need be, I'll look for a glade forum to post to, but since this _is_ Centos 5 spedific for the machine I'm working on, I felt it appropriate to ping this list first. Thanks. Scott

4 8

Silly question x64 vs i386
by Scot P. Floess 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

I have a really silly question... but just want to ask... I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... My other boxes are all i386. As this x86_64 machine can, at most, house 4 GB of RAM (currently only has 1 GB) - is there any advantage to my running x86_64 on that machine instead of i386... Long story as to why I am asking - but before I go off and moveit down to i386 - just wanted some opinions :) Scot P. Floess 27 Lake Royale Louisburg, NC 27549 252-478-8087 (Home) 919-890-8117 (Work) Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros

14 24

Problems with nss_ldap - where to start?
by Peter Serwe 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

I've been unsuccessfully trying to get nss_ldap to work. I've chased down hundreds of google searches over the last 3 days, and I can't seem to get a centos system to authenticate against ldap. Every daemon on the system is running into the same problem: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server - Server is unavailable sshd, nscd, httpd, you name it.. slapd is clearly running, telnet localhost 389 actually connects me to it. I've run authconfig, /etc/sysconfig/authconfig agrees. I'm at a complete and utter loss. I've followed every how-to out there, RH, Openldap, Debian, FreeBSD I can verify ldap is working, I can't seem to get any PAM applications to use it. Peter -- Peter Serwe http://truthlightway.blogspot.com/

6 31

Updated request tracker install instructions for centos 5.4?
by dnk 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Has anyone seen updated request tracker install instructions for centos 5.4? Thanks! D

1 0

acpi for Intel p45 chipset (C2Duo)
by Mr. X 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Hello, First time I install Centos (5.4) on a consumer Intel Motherboard. I've done 5+ AMD (am2 form factor) installs. The MB is Gigabyte ep45-ud3r with a CPU:Intel LGA 775 E7600 wolfdale I cracked the lm_sensors nut with 2 modules and lm_sensors from elrepo. The modules were kmod-coretemp kmod-it87 Now I'm trying to get cpuspeed to behave, or at least understand what it's doing. Here's my bios objects ------------ snip dmesg--------- $sudo dmesg | grep state ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3]) ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports 8 throttling states) ACPI: CPU1 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3]) ACPI: Processor [CPU1] (supports 8 throttling states) ---------- unsnip ---------- In the advanced bios menu I enabled all the switches for CPU state management. If not enabled there is no acpi. My CPU is OC'ed to 3.74 Ghz The Intel state management hands it off to the kernel with max frequency of 2.8Ghz but bogoMips is unchanged and reflects OC'ed value. There are supposed to be 8 throttling states, but acpi-cpufreq (driver) only uses 3 states (1.6 Ghz - 2.8 Ghz). Has anyone found another driver to work better? I tried speedstep-centrino but it refuses to load. There is also p4-clockmod too, but I had doubts about it. Is this the best I can do? So far benchmarks are very good and the acpi power management does not hurt them. -- Mark

1 0

Munin issue
by Joseph L. Casale 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Hey Guys, I am trying to wrap some loose ends up before we close tomorrow and have one last thing. I have been asked to monitor tunnel bandwidth for vpn clients over the holidays and whipped up a quick Munin plugin to do this. It works well but one problem is that when a client disconnects, the plugin stops submitting graph data for it, so the png's don't show the user anymore, kinda hard to see what's been done over the time period they "were" connected. How can I tell Munin to retain the data it has seen? I would rather this approach then hardcode the users in, as I have to manually maintain that list then... Thanks! jlc

3 3

C5 updates?
by Rainer Traut 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Hi, is there some congestion with C5 updates? Upstream has released some security and bugfix updates so far... Thx Rainer PS: i guess as soon as this mail arrives at the list, the updates start flowing. :)

6 8

NTP
by Davy Leon 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Hi folks I have a Centos 5.3. I'm wondering how can I make this linux box to act as a time server for my small network. I just need this Centos PC act as a time reference for the other PCs so they can keep the time exact the same as the Centos server. Don;t need to syncronize the server with tyhe internet, just keep my local network with the same time in all the PC. Thanks in advance David

3 3

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 58, Issue 4
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2009:1622 CentOS 5 x86_64 cman Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CEBA-2009:1622 CentOS 5 i386 cman Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CESA-2009:1620 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 bind Update (Karanbir Singh) 4. CESA-2009:1620 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 bind Update (Karanbir Singh) 5. CESA-2009:1619 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 dstat Update (Karanbir Singh) 6. CESA-2009:1619 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 dstat Update (Karanbir Singh) 7. CESA-2009:1615 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 xerces-j2 Update (Karanbir Singh) 8. CESA-2009:1615 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 xerces-j2 Update (Karanbir Singh) 9. CEBA-2009:1621 CentOS 5 i386 screen Update (Karanbir Singh) 10. CEBA-2009:1621 CentOS 5 x86_64 screen Update (Karanbir Singh) 11. CEBA-2009:1634 CentOS 5 i386 glibc Update (Karanbir Singh) 12. CEBA-2009:1634 CentOS 5 x86_64 glibc Update (Karanbir Singh) 13. CESA-2009:1670 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update (Karanbir Singh) 14. CESA-2009:1670 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:39:12 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1622 CentOS 5 x86_64 cman Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217123912.GA20159(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1622 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1622.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c4004263b65b6c85d91a7db21207ba37 cman-2.0.115-1.el5_4.9.x86_64.rpm 0e05a83d9d9c422e714f63e7fc8b7d55 cman-devel-2.0.115-1.el5_4.9.i386.rpm a29f277ab1fb15fa7e07762dcb98fb60 cman-devel-2.0.115-1.el5_4.9.x86_64.rpm Source: 3a8d3a86bb626741ec8e45e28425548a cman-2.0.115-1.el5_4.9.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:39:12 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1622 CentOS 5 i386 cman Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217123912.GA20145(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1622 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1622.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: a3190e6f2249f52f21b008148fe7106d cman-2.0.115-1.el5_4.9.i386.rpm 3d8be57e9c7a487c4c26e97aed860181 cman-devel-2.0.115-1.el5_4.9.i386.rpm Source: 3a8d3a86bb626741ec8e45e28425548a cman-2.0.115-1.el5_4.9.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:39:21 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1620 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 bind Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217123921.GA20179(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1620 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1620.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4ba1219592bbf4f5c666c1721e3e3485 bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 15a4732261f55cbb17559bdc15d794eb bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm c52d678a8edcfab2a3a41a8481773ed7 bind-devel-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm d774c42c849b1bf9230b7eea39d05777 bind-libbind-devel-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm d97af0b736c6e3fd9db957167fb40145 bind-libs-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 6fe61b1d21f87f5efad9ea9f4b897ef4 bind-sdb-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 23bfdc9b2a883cbf71eba355980d0c19 bind-utils-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 347a9d849205779b56f437c1788af74a caching-nameserver-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm Source: b19035682640da74cb1e35843b2ab06b bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:39:22 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1620 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 bind Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217123922.GA20192(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1620 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1620.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 3ab90f18a941649711154d39b5c6c81a bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 9e11b8d54d44327422dfd235f741237a bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm e8efc409a51b4d8a0d299d772c1550a9 bind-devel-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm cb20d64f9b1253ff6ec5f36f02d98d0a bind-devel-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm d719d1aa1e7233af06ff56c0d26cbe9a bind-libbind-devel-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm cf040fcdb33650124f24a4e3db6e247b bind-libbind-devel-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 4476b6eab2604254b22e222c9a18fc3d bind-libs-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm c3075e476294a217073dac56856bd325 bind-libs-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm a78a057d819c8052f11db8fef980ef5b bind-sdb-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 78cea1f004334bd2308d57ae703c622e bind-utils-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm cb91fc9f421eba67ace16a0623426795 caching-nameserver-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: b19035682640da74cb1e35843b2ab06b bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:39:29 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1619 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 dstat Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217123929.GA20210(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1619 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1619.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c19a45531a2bca531c9532ab9331cdbb dstat-0.6.6-3.el5_4.1.noarch.rpm Source: 708da27ec9ceddc1516817c239e6cfd8 dstat-0.6.6-3.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:39:29 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1619 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 dstat Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217123929.GA20223(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1619 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1619.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 154ef41934d5e609ccbc28650bdb8f35 dstat-0.6.6-3.el5_4.1.noarch.rpm Source: 708da27ec9ceddc1516817c239e6cfd8 dstat-0.6.6-3.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:40:02 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1615 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 xerces-j2 Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217124002.GA20244(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1615 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1615.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 5323eadf5530c8f9c8fcbe513126d89b xerces-j2-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.i386.rpm a3a50e375c3034ceaf595fb39b388e6d xerces-j2-demo-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 2499677e6c1e0d4d06fbe52f0a77ca6f xerces-j2-javadoc-apis-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 4550b09007bd06e765e56439328f5581 xerces-j2-javadoc-impl-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 5f2397981abbd2353a3cbf2fb94cbf69 xerces-j2-javadoc-other-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 9016e16c0a05981b3fe3e2d096cb4297 xerces-j2-javadoc-xni-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.i386.rpm a589e7a6308509015fc561a3c5ea06a0 xerces-j2-scripts-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.i386.rpm Source: 92c5ee208f99ea19c5d0d3f016480fd9 xerces-j2-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:40:02 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1615 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 xerces-j2 Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217124002.GA20257(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1615 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1615.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 64ff9fa8e580e4a350e0640eff764cd3 xerces-j2-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 99693b45b48b5a74c566c7c11745569f xerces-j2-demo-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 721c000f0990e4edca03c94fb8067be2 xerces-j2-javadoc-apis-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm cef0846a0ef3f30133786d4f74c7b378 xerces-j2-javadoc-impl-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 791930dbd9ab04b58e98efc55bfe77f0 xerces-j2-javadoc-other-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 56ed388d2f4c817208c75851591b5859 xerces-j2-javadoc-xni-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 9713fa8c9ca9fded894c3d7b26b1f723 xerces-j2-scripts-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 92c5ee208f99ea19c5d0d3f016480fd9 xerces-j2-2.7.1-7jpp.2.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:45:17 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1621 CentOS 5 i386 screen Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217124517.GA20340(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1621 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1621.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 98c5fc2cd841650d1e1f29b8be63cfd5 screen-4.0.3-1.el5_4.1.i386.rpm Source: 5b37366eb8365083a89015f2cfb05e25 screen-4.0.3-1.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:45:17 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1621 CentOS 5 x86_64 screen Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217124517.GA20353(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1621 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1621.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a78873a47ed43d0601e2aaf3c915ea29 screen-4.0.3-1.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 5b37366eb8365083a89015f2cfb05e25 screen-4.0.3-1.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:49:56 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1634 CentOS 5 i386 glibc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217124956.GA20476(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1634 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1634.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 2a03849b9016147d301f1dee2af3bb3b glibc-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 63fec3f057dfdf2c5d2db785255714de glibc-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i686.rpm d4e4b51eb7a9503dfa2f6a9827b77b12 glibc-common-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 5989ae4b0ef2931d0e493630dbddd8c0 glibc-devel-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 70578b26d83da60ac1f3c7a6311bf2c5 glibc-headers-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 65ada5cb3d847fac026fc3150e48657f glibc-utils-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 3ad59e3ed6e1583d95964aec3f42f9ca nscd-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i386.rpm Source: a42d65990e932f0411165a1b1d4bc62f glibc-2.5-42.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:49:56 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1634 CentOS 5 x86_64 glibc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217124956.GA20491(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:1634 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1634.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: e46954e891a3b1fad94e5c4a71c28de2 glibc-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i686.rpm af5f1a71ad66363bce95fc8ea6056657 glibc-2.5-42.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 9584d1f6609e829d736496442b669737 glibc-common-2.5-42.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm c0134aca08b356cbe5847d2c47561aa8 glibc-devel-2.5-42.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 03f49a24c4d9499729bdc4959c982993 glibc-devel-2.5-42.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm a916b9e338e711ab69288d6d4fedd3d9 glibc-headers-2.5-42.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 0eb28fbd2723473fce849c4604b78038 glibc-utils-2.5-42.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm ae2e9abc02d8a31331fc818e4797f739 nscd-2.5-42.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm Source: a42d65990e932f0411165a1b1d4bc62f glibc-2.5-42.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:56:30 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1670 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217125630.GA20592(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1670 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1670.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4ebf0f729de91d5fd405384af2c7c051 kernel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm 733d3ea1906ef4a20eb93b60c89f7b36 kernel-debug-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm cee536fa76e6423ca2a91f3fb85bda72 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm 11490358fcde3ec179bd668ed82df8a5 kernel-devel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm 5416595bbfcf90a85108b235521839c1 kernel-doc-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.noarch.rpm 7f426b401b0b04893ba97a18386c669b kernel-headers-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i386.rpm 0b98d06b3c29fbe78b59c2c174db5e93 kernel-PAE-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm c4d224bfdce49828d4e194716c0ea524 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm 0407460b0988ae0459a2b3f72973b9ba kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm e2b8435de8b052ff4e966b2436c4c74b kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.i686.rpm Source: 1be967edd5b52ee8ce03e82a72c94c33 kernel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:56:30 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1670 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20091217125630.GA20607(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1670 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1670.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: db3c1189e5fa66c1e4c47b8f6a07248e kernel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.x86_64.rpm c1799620f8046d04e2feeebe623acd97 kernel-debug-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 40c336da4a6cb13fd30af0e173dd20bb kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 521bcd256d09478bb120ba159df4ee14 kernel-devel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.x86_64.rpm d1708314fa7f68f51b8c1191082320cc kernel-doc-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.noarch.rpm 3e729cec62c9f8b83672348a2b6f7685 kernel-headers-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 6abc1b16fa4fcfd908c170b6b2552107 kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.x86_64.rpm cf96008f7b974a8dd0c50fe727f38373 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 1be967edd5b52ee8ce03e82a72c94c33 kernel-2.6.18-164.9.1.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 58, Issue 4 **********************************************

1 0

Image conversion with ImageMagick doesn't work on CentOS, but it works fine on Debian Lenny.
by Peter Serwe 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

I recently came across the need to convert jpg images with IM, did a standard install of "yum -y install ImageMagick" and found that images converted with CentOS's base port of IM would actually corrupt the images, yet using the same (albiet different version, different distro) software didn't corrupt the images at all. By corrupted, I mean, the bottom portion of the image under *some* webservers looked completely wrong, and had strange checkering of the image in stripes across the bottom. At the time I had this problem, I took the issue to IM's forum, to no avail. I ended up just using it on a Debian machine instead. Peter -- Peter Serwe http://truthlightway.blogspot.com/

4 11

Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine
by Jussi Hirvi 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

>> What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on a new >> computer? >> [...] >> Would it be enough to boot with a DVD in rescue mode, or boot with >> another hd, and install grub? > On 16.12.2009 12:16, Sorin Srbu wrote: > For me it has worked to just install the old hd in the new machine and boot > it up. Kudzo takes care of the rest. Then you have been lucky. :-) For me, the startup stopped already before the CentOS splash screen. I guess something was wrong with the initrd. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi(a)greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

5 11

Red Hat commercial support for CentOS/Fedora
by Rogelio 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are so similar). Can anyone here substantiate this claim?

7 8

OT: Google Earth - How to uninstall, before installing newest version?
by Lanny Marcus 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Desktop is CentOS 5.4 (32 bit). I have Google Earth version 4.2.205.5730 (13NOV2007 build date) installed. I have checkinstall (spelling?) installed, but am not sure if that was installed before or after Google Earth was installed. I have the Google Repository installed, but apparently Google Earth cannot be updated via yum and probably it was not installed via yum. Question: What is the best way for me to uninstall this version of Google Earth, completely, before I install the newest version? (This also applies to removing Skype, which I am certain was not installed via yum, before I install the static version of Skype, that was recently recommended on the list). TIA and Happy Holidays! Lanny Magazine subscriptions Largest discount Credit/Debit Card Check PayPal http://www.lowcostmagazines.com/

3 7

Subversion server: v1.4 (centos) vs. v1.6 (rpmforge)
by Mathieu Baudier 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Hi, I'm planning to upgrade an old public/internal development infrastructure and will use CentOS 5.4 x86_64 as basis. One of the critical server is Subversion (as an Apache httpd module). We currently use Subversion v1.4 on the server and v1.6 on our clients. While I was very happy with the v1.4 server over the years, we now sometimes have weird issues which seem related to compatibility with the v1.6 clients (typically working copy depth related). I also want to take the chance of this major overhaul of our infrastructure (and related testing etc.) to upgrade the various components and I'll be happy to benefit from Subversion improvements on the server side as well (especially if it then the version in production for another few years). The Subversion version in CentOS 5.4 is v1.4, whereas RPMForge provides v1.6. I use the RPMForge version as my client on the desktop. - Has anyone of you experience running Subversion servers on CentOS? - Would you in general consider as less secure / safe / stable to use RPMForge packages for such critical tasks? Thanks in advance for your thoughts! Mathieu

4 5

Apache + auth_mod_kerb + Active Directory = SSO
by James Bensley 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Hey List, I have been setting up SSO on our Intranet Apache server. All seems well, I think I have just about cracked it but it seems a little rough around the edges; I enabled auth_mod_kerb, and created a test directory in my web root (/secure) and added a directory directive under the httpd.conf, I created a user in Active Ditectory, used ktpass.exe to map the user to the service principal and put the key tab on the Apache server and all seems well. I am testing this with FireFox and Internet Explorer (Both on Windows XP Pro SP3 Client). FireFox works only with the FQDN of the Intranet server (and not just http://hostname/secure, this gives an authentication error), and only with our domain name set in "network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris" and in "network.negotate-auth.trusted-uris". Internet Explorer however only works with http://hostname/secure and not f.q.d.n/secure? (Integrate with Windows Authentication IS enabled). Obviously as this point the reason I am posting here is because I am trying to eliminate the reasons for this. If it is a client side problem I need to seeks some more savvy IE/Windows users maybe but I am posting here to enquire if anyone has any thoughts about it possibly being DNS related or some sort of server misconfiguration? uname -a Linux hades.nr5project.co.uk 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 09:19:18 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) mod_auth_kerb/5.4 DAV/2 mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8k PHP/5.2.9 mod_apreq2-20051231/2.6.0 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 Thanks for reading. -- Regards, James ;) Charles de Gaulle - "The better I get to know men, the more I find myself loving dogs." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/charles_de_gaulle.html

2 1

Clarification required for ICMP Error Message
by Balaji 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Dear All, Currently i am using CentOS4.4 Linux Release I have getting the following message every 10 seconds on my screen "kernel: 192.168.163.193 sent an invalid ICMP type 3, code 0 error to a broadcast: 172.24.255.255 on eth0" Can any one explain me about this problem Thanks in Advance Regards, -S.Balaji

2 1

mod_security
by Thomas Dukes 16 Dec '09

16 Dec '09

I installed mod_security yesterday. Unbelievable the amount of crap it will stop in 24 hrs. Picked up the rpm at http://rpm.pbone.net This should be made part of the CentOS extra, contribs or whatever!!

4 5

LVM, usb drives, Active Directory
by Scott Ehrlich 16 Dec '09

16 Dec '09

I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap storage in a single mount point). The next fun piece is how to incorporate that storage space into an existing Active Directory structure to apply AD acls for limited access. I'd rather not use Samba, as that is its own infrastructure and maintains its own credentials database. What are my best options? Thanks. Scott

12 18

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss