- Discuss - lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Screen blanking
by C.M. Connelly 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

"CM" == Chris Mason (Lists) "IV" == Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez(a)ivazquez.net> CM> I have a couple of LCD monitors attached to Centos CM> servers, I would like to be able to watch the logs on the CM> monitors but after a while they go blank. How can I CM> disable this? IV> setterm and/or screensaver preferences. The usual magic is something like setterm -powersave off -blank 0 -store which works when typed at a console. To get it to persist across boots (and to not have to enter it by hand every time), you need to insert the command into the boot sequence. You can add this line to /etc/rc.local or add a script to /etc/init.d and have it run in appropriate run levels (probably all, so 12345). Claire -- *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Claire Connelly cmc(a)math.hmc.edu Systems Administrator (909) 621-8754 Department of Mathematics Harvey Mudd College *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gaim- security update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gaim - security update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 bzip2 - security update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS 4 i386 bzip2 - security update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 gaim - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS 3 ia64 bzip2 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 7. CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS 3 s390(x) bzip2 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 8. CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 gaim - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 9. CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS 4 ia64 bzip2 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 10. CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS i386 gaim - security update (Tru Huynh) 11. CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS i386 bzip2 - security update (Tru Huynh) 12. CESA-2005:474 Low CentOS x86_64 bzip2 - security update (Tru Huynh) 13. CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS x86_64 gaim - security update (Tru Huynh) 14. CentOS 3.5 is now final (Lance Davis) 15. CESA-2005:474-01: Low CentOS 2 i386 bzip2 security update (John Newbigin) 16. CESA-2005:512-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 mc security update (John Newbigin) 17. CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) gaim - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 18. CentOS 4 x86_64 - CentOS 4.1 x86_64 is available (Johnny Hughes) 19. CentOS 4.1 ia64 is now final (Pasi Pirhonen) 20. CentOS 4.1 is now released and is set to be the default CentOS 4 version (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:02:48 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists(a)hughesjr.com> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:518 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gaim- security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <1118955768.4118.145.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:518 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-518.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: gaim-1.3.1-0.el3.i386.rpm src: gaim-1.3.1-0.el3.src.rpm

1 0

kickstart software raid on sata drives
by Robin Mordasiewicz 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

This is what I have for configuring software raid on sata drives in my kickstart config <snip kickstart.cfg> clearpart --initlabel --all part swap --size=2048 --ondisk=sdb part swap --size=2048 --ondisk=sda part raid.01 --size=101 --ondisk=sda part raid.02 --size=101 --ondisk=sdb part raid.04 --size=1 --grow --ondisk=sdb part raid.03 --size=1 --grow --ondisk=sda raid / --fstype ext3 --level=RAID1 raid.03 raid.04 raid /boot --fstype ext3 --level=RAID1 raid.01 raid.02 </snip>

2 1

X-Windows client for MS-Win2K
by James B. Byrne 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

An intermittent need to connect to a CentOS4 development box from a MS-Win2K workstation using X-Windows has developed here. However, I cannot seem to find a cheap (read free) X-windows client for MS- Windows to accommodate this. This seems very odd to me, displaying no doubt my profound ignorance of the issues involved. The few shareware versions that I have located expect registration fees in the $90-100 range, which is something I have never encountered before. Is there a free X-Windows client for Microsoft OS's? Why is this software so rare and dear? Regards, Jim -- *** e-mail is not a secure channel *** mailto:byrnejb.<token>@harte-lyne.ca James B. Byrne Harte & Lyne Limited vox: +1 905 561 1241 9 Brockley Drive fax: +1 905 561 0757 Hamilton, Ontario <token> = hal Canada L8E 3C3

14 13

OpenSSL on CentOS 3.4?
by Peter Loron 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

I'm running a CentOS 3.4 box. According to yum, the OpenSSL 0.9.7a-33.15 package I have installed is the latest available. A check of the OpenSSL website shows 0.9.7g source being the latest. Is the CentOS 0.9.7a package patched to cover the same isues that the generic 0.9.7 source covers? If not, what's my recourse? Build it by hand? If I need to build it, has anybody crossed that bridge? Thanks. -Pete

3 3

Re: X-Windows client for MS-Win2K
by Bowie_Bailey＠BUC.com 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

I will be away from the office until Monday, June 27. If you need an immediate response, please send your email to support(a)buc.com. Thank you, Bowie Bailey BUC International

2 1

Re: Out of memory problems - some interesting log file entries
by Bowie_Bailey＠BUC.com 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

I will be away from the office until Monday, June 27. If you need an immediate response, please send your email to support(a)buc.com. Thank you, Bowie Bailey BUC International

1 0

Out of memory problems - some interesting log file entries
by Brian Parish 17 Jun '05

17 Jun '05

This is a newly installed server running CentOS 4 with all current updates. It's been cruising nicely since installation a week ago until this morning. Then everyting started timing out and the attached messages appeared in the log (this is a short and sanitized extract). Load went sky high. Had to reboot to restore service and all looks happy again now, but if anyone can provide some input on these messages... TIA Brian

3 3

Re: X-Windows client for MS-Win2K
by Bowie_Bailey＠BUC.com 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

I will be away from the office until Monday, June 27. If you need an immediate response, please send your email to support(a)buc.com. Thank you, Bowie Bailey BUC International

1 0

Burning CDs
by centos＠911networks.com 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

Hi, I have just installed 4.1 on a new Dell Latitude d610. It does not automount the CDs. When I mount the CD manually I get: $mount /media/cdrecorder mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting read-only The CD writer is an Philips IDE: CDRW/DVD-ROM CDD5263 Here is my mtab: $ cat /etc/mtab /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 / ext3 rw 0 0 none /proc proc rw 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620 0 0 usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw 0 0 /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0 /dev/hdc /media/cdrecorder iso9660 ro,nosuid,nodev,user=froggy 0 0 How do I change /dev/hdc /media/cdrecorder iso9660 ro to rw? $ cat /etc/fstab # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults 1 1 LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2 none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap swap defaults 0 0 /dev/hdc /media/cdrecorder auto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 -- Thanks

4 4

Serial Console + VGA Console
by Gerald Waugh 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

Hi, Trying to get vga console and a serial console to both work. I can get either one to fully work but not both. When using serial, I do still get a login prompt on the vga, But not all the boot up output. Seems like half to the vga and the rest to the serial port I added lines to /etc/inittab # console port T0:12345:respawn:/sbin/agetty -L ttyS0 115200 And added to /etc/lilo.conf append="console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8" I tried to add to "serial=0,115200n8" lilo.conf, but this gives error unsoported baud rate, commenting the line out seems to work. Any ideas on how to get both VGA and serial console to fully work? Maybe, I can have one but not the other? Gerald

4 3

RE: X-Windows client for MS-Win2K
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

From: Mike Kercher <mike(a)CamaroSS.net> > Have you considered using VNC instead? I do this to just start an > xterm...from there I can run Mozilla or whatever. A nested X server is probably a better solution. Passing the native widgets over remote protocols is always going to be a better solution than using a dumb, pixel-by-pixel remote framebuffer. I.e., use RDP, X11, ICA, etc... when you have an option instead of pcAnywhere, VNC, etc... if you can. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

turning off prelinking?
by alex＠milivojevic.org 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

In short, the reason considering (and still only considering) turning it off is to make tripwire usable again (security vs. performance, I guess). Is it possible to completely turn it off system-wide? Any additional steps needed on the existing system (that already have half of the binaries prelinked)? What order of performance degradation to expect? If it is minor, nobody is going to cry about it. My old RH 7.3 systems don't have prelinking, and I don't see them being any slower than FC2 and newer systems that have prelinking... ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

4 4

Antw: CentOS Digest, Vol 5, Issue 15
by Arthur MEßNER 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

Is there a problem with the newly releases telnet packages ? [root@host root]# rpm -Uvh telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm --test error: telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm: MD5 digest: BAD Expected(9d785005 error: telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm cannot be installed [root@host root]# The same error occures with telnet, and also in the different architectures. I tried i386 and x86_64 Directory Listing: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 53949 Jun 15 08:53 telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 33751 Jun 15 08:53 telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 48845 Jun 15 08:53 telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 31196 Jun 15 08:53 telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm MD5SUM: c9c915a0c0dc5062761a5eaf71b07ca3 telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm 3675d6149364402fc1c63b850cef49da telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm c45a2d212cfc8b4e58b70484e52899d6 telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm a8a7817f86327c453e527941106a0ea8 telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm I tried two different mirror, but this error Message was always the same.

2 1

Centos 4.1 DVD ISO
by Mário Gamito 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

Hi, Does anyone knows of a place where one can download through HTTP (and only HTTP) the CentOS 4.1 DVD ISO ? I'm behind a firewall and have no chance of either getting it through bittorrent or FTP. Any help would be apreciated. Warm regads, Mário Gamito

3 5

Is a new HP-dl380 dual XEON 64 bit or 32 bit
by Robin Mordasiewicz 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

Ho can I tell if a new xeon is 32 bit or 64 bit ? --

8 16

Big trouble: can't start server after new kernel
by Mário Gamito 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

Hi, I have this file server with CentOS 4.0 Each time a new kernel comes out, i have to recompile it, becuse i need Appletalk support and the kernel doesn't have it. I've done this before many times and in other servers, and all went well. Now, in this particular server, with the new 2.6.9-11, after i've recompiled it, created the .img and edited grub, the machine doesn't start at all. It says it can't find the kernel image. I cannot even boot with older kernels. To worsten things, i have LVM, so "linux rescue" tells me there's no Linux installation in the server and leaves me with a prompt. Now, i can mount /boot because it is outside the LVM, but when i do it, i lost access to any command, even a mere ls. Tried to pre-copy vi before the /boot mount and could access /boot/grub/menu.lst Everything seems fine, the files are all in /boot ...!!! Do i need to run grub command after editing menu.lst ? Never did that. And why can't i boot from older kernels ? Now, the really nasty thing: somehow, i don't have the smallest hint, i had a 500 GB external USB disk to make the backups, and the "linux rescue" erased it :( :( :( Bogles me!!! Please help me. This one can cost me the job. Loosing 300 GB of files from ~ 100 users on the file server is unforgiven. Any help would be apreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito

2 2

CentOS 4.1
by alex＠milivojevic.org 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

Question about differences in RHEL 4.1 and CentOS 4.1 organization. Does CentOS follows same organization as RHEL? I don't see separate directory for 4.1 on Red Hat's ftp server (well, the public part of it, with SRPM packages), seems like all the updates were simply dumped into the 4.0 updates area, so basically doing normal system upgrade will bump all RHEL 4.0 systems to 4.1. On the other hand, on CentOS site, there is a separate directory for 4.1, with distinct set of packages for 4.1 that are not present in 4.0 update area. So basically, one would need to manually point yum to 4.1 directory tree to fully update system with latest bug fixes. Is this difference in approach intentional? Or the acutal update process (for those with RHEL subscriptions) is actually like the one for CentOS? How do you determine what packages were "regular" updates, and which packages were part of U1? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

10 13

Re: Burning CDs
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 16 Jun '05

16 Jun '05

From: centos(a)911networks.com > Hi, > I have just installed 4.1 on a new Dell Latitude d610. It does > not automount the CDs. When I mount the CD manually I get: > $mount /media/cdrecorder > mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting read-only First off, there is a multitude of understanding that is required. Most consumers are not aware of many differences between CD-R v. CD-RW access, CD-R v. CD-RW filesystems, etc... In Windows, some of this is hidden from you to a point, but not all. E.g., you use a program to "record" whereas you directly access the drive letter to to "read/write." Windows only lets you "record" to CD-R (or CD-RW emulating CD-R), and won't "read/write" to anything but CD-RW (with a non-ISO9660 fs). These two processes are actually _different_. What type of CD did you insert? A CD-RW? CD-R? Or CD-ROM? Also note that CDs are not "formatted read/write" with ISO9660. ISO9660 is a linear, byte-by-byte track, that is not modifyable (most specifically, data is a "Yellow Book" track of ISO9660). You have to use _another_ filesystem to have "read/write." UDF is its replacement, although almost any filesystem can be used. As I said, a multitude of understanding. > The CD writer is an Philips IDE: CDRW/DVD-ROM CDD5263 There is some "read/write" support for CD-RW in kernel 2.6. I haven't messed with it personally. Otherwise, you pre-master an .iso file with "mkisofs," and then you record with "cdrecord." There are GUI tools build around those 2 programs to help you. That's for CD-R (or CD-RW emulating CD-R). > Here is my mtab: > $ cat /etc/mtab > /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 / ext3 rw 0 0 > none /proc proc rw 0 0 > none /sys sysfs rw 0 0 > none /dev/pts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620 0 0 > usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw 0 0 > /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 > none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 > none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0 > /dev/hdc /media/cdrecorder iso9660 ro,nosuid,nodev,user=froggy 0 0 > How do I change /dev/hdc /media/cdrecorder iso9660 ro to rw? You can't. You can't really "read/write" anything that is ISO9660. It is clear that this CD media (CD-RW?) was written as ISO9660. All you can do is append additional sessions/tracks (if CD-R), or re-format it (if CD-RW). These are just things that some Windows tools "hide" from you. But you still probably need to know about them. > $ cat /etc/fstab > # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details > /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults 1 1 > LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2 > none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 > none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 > none /proc proc defaults 0 0 > none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 > /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap swap defaults 0 0 > /dev/hdc /media/cdrecorder auto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 Stick in a new CD-RW media that has been formatted UDF and see what happens. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

Sound card under CentOS 4
by Harper, Patrick 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

I am swapping my laptop over to CentOS and for some reason alsa swapped my headphone jack and speakers designations during the install. I got it so that my sounds work but was wondering how to swap them back so they are defined/labeled right and why it might have done it in the first place Thanks for your help ----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This electronic message, including any attachments, is confidential and intended solely for use of the intended recipient(s). This message may contain information that is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by applicable law. Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, use or reproduction is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.

1 0

Re: New Server Recommendation -- Hot-Swap SATA enclosure ...
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

[ Yes, SP^M'n the list with follow-ups to myself ;-] From: Bryan J. Smith > If you are building a new system with such storage requirements, > I would really push you towards a 3Ware Escalade 8006-2 or 8506-4. When cost is supreme, then just a Escalade 7006-2 or 8006-2 with (2) [P]ATA or [S]ATA drives is what you want. It only adds ~$125 to system cost. When you want to minimize cost, but also minimize troubles, I recommend an Escalade 8506-4LP with an EN-8721A02 (Beige) or EN-8721B02 (Black) 5.25" x 3U (3xHH) internal enclosure. SATA was explicitly designed for hot-swap with fixed, SCA-like, staggered, fixed-position connectors with _no_ extra interconnect (i.e., like SCA SCSI drives, SATA drives _should_ connect _directly_ to the backplane, and the "can" is just a frame/handle), so _avoid_ doing such with [P]ATA which is only asking for issues. The EN-8721x02 will only set you back $150, so it's well worth it (especially when you're already spending $300 for the Escalade 8506-4LP, it's only 50% more). It's also nice to have an "extra can" for either holding a spare, or mounting a replacement without having to take one of the existing drives out before it is replaced. Enlight EN-8721: http://us.enlightcorp.com/products/server/detel.php?serial=42 Enlight EN-8721_SATA (x02) Guide: http://us.enlightcorp.com/products/server/pdf_files/EN-8721_SATA.pdf -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

Re: New Server Recommendation -- disk label strategy, quotas, etc...
by "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org>" 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

> LVM/LVM2 helps reduce this, but I still like to use the approach > (except I just don't make spares, I just reserve 15-30% of disk > space for LVM/LVM2). Let me clarify that -- I still put the _whole_ disk under LVM/LVM2 (maybe leaving a legacy BIOS/DOS primary 256MB in a pre-formatted FAT16 if I need it for firmware updates). But instead of pre-allocating "spares" of each size (essential/support/discretionary), I reserve 15-30% of the disk for future allocation by LVM/LVM2. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

Re: New Server Recommendation -- disk label strategy, quotas, etc...
by "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org>" 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

From: Mike Kercher <mike(a)CamaroSS.net> > I'm about to deploy a new server for hosting sites and email for a > number of small individuals using a CentOS 4 box. I've been looking > for a recommended installation guide for RHEL4/CentOS4 giving > recommended disk partitioning I have personal recommendations I follow. One thing I really try to do is make 2-3 "classes" of filesystem sizes, with 1 "spare" for each. That way I can flop around filesystems, accomodate additions, etc... LVM/LVM2 helps reduce this, but I still like to use the approach (except I just don't make spares, I just reserve 15-30% of disk space for LVM/LVM2). E.g., the "essential" class is typically 2-8GB each. The "support" class is typically 8-64GB each. The "discretionary" class is typically 64+GB each. For all systems, I typically do these "essential" classes: / /tmp /var I also typically create the following "support" classes: /usr /usr/local (and a symlink from /opt -> /usr/local) And more "support" class filesystems for servers: /var (instead of an "essential" size) /srv (newer FHS 2.3+ compliant systems) /var/log /var/lib (application, database, etc... servers) /var/mail (mail servers) /var/spool (mail, print, etc... servers) /var/www (web servers) /var/ftp (FTP servers) In some cases -- FHS 2.3+ compliant -- these are under /srv instead of /var. If I want local data/temporary storage, I typically create of the "discretionary" size: /export|home/(systemname) I like to make at least _3_ "discretionary" size, 2 mounted with 1 spare, so 1/3rd each. Again, in the day of LVM/LVM2, I typically just reserve 15-30% of the disk allocation instead of making pre-made spares of each class -- but I would at least make _2_ "discretionary" size (instead of one big one). I also use "/export" when I know I'm going to be exporting them via NFS (and setting up my NIS/LDAP autmounter maps accordingly). Otherwise I use /home. Even if I'm not sure I'm going to export via NFS, if I'm sharing via SMB, then I put them under /export. In a nutshell, if they are network mountable (for whatever protocol), they are under /export. > as well as quotas. I've not used quotas with LVM yet. Don't quote me, but quotas are a filesystem issue and shouldn't matter with LVM/LVM2 disk labels. I'd personally like to see a performance evaluation of Ext3 v. XFS _with_ quota operations. Most comparisons these days seem to be "raw" block operations -- whether big or small -- instead of disk operations sysadmins would normally do day-to-day. > This box is going to have an 80 IDE system drive, an 80G SATA and a > 250G SATA for everything else. One thing I want to be sure of is that > I don't run out of space for the mail spools in /var/spool/mail. If you are building a new system with such storage requirements, I would really push you towards a 3Ware Escalade 8006-2 or 8506-4. Have you already purchased the hard drives? If so, then merely buy a 2nd 80GB SATA and 2nd 250GB SATA with a 8506-4 and use RAID-1 for each. If not, then just buy a cheaper 8006-2 and use RAID-1 with (2) 300GB disks (you might consider this even if you already have some drives). > Does anyone know of a guide for this online? I think sysadmins differ so widly that there is no uniform approach. Even my 2-3 class approach is rather dated in the age of LVM/LVM2, although I continue to use it out of habit. > I wish Johnny had a guide like this on his site :) Well, I'm sure most of my approaches come from SunOS/Solaris even before Linux really caught on, much less the Linux FHS, more recent updates, etc... -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

New Server Recommendation
by Mike Kercher 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

I'm about to deploy a new server for hosting sites and email for a number of small individuals using a CentOS 4 box. I've been looking for a recommended installation guide for RHEL4/CentOS4 giving recommended disk partitioning as well as quotas. I've not used quotas with LVM yet. This box is going to have an 80 IDE system drive, an 80G SATA and a 250G SATA for everything else. One thing I want to be sure of is that I don't run out of space for the mail spools in /var/spool/mail. Does anyone know of a guide for this online? I wish Johnny had a guide like this on his site :) Mike

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 4, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS 4 ia64 squid - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 telnet - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS 3 ia64 squid - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 telnet - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) telnet - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 squid - security update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS 4 i386 squid - security update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 telnet - security update (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 telnet - security update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS 3 s390(x) squid - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 11. CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS i386 telnet - security update (Tru Huynh) 12. CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS i386 squid - security update (Tru Huynh) 13. CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS x86_64 telnet - security update (Tru Huynh) 14. CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS x86_64 squid - security update (Tru Huynh) 15. CESA-2005:504-00: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 telnet security update (John Newbigin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:28:53 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)iki.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:415 Low CentOS 4 ia64 squid - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050614202853.GV21054(a)core.upi.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:415 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-415.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.9.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/

1 0

Centos 3.x telnet update problem
by Les Mikesell 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

A 'yum update' on a Centos 3.x machine is giving: Getting telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386 100% |=========================| 48 kB 00:00 Error: Unsigned Package /var/cache/yum/update/packages/telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm Is this a bad package? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

system environment variables
by Ken Godee 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

CentOS 3.x Don't know how this got by me, but for years I've been previously using /etc/profile to set system wide environment variables and now I just noticed it doesn't work any more (sort of). If you log in via console it works, log in via gdm, it does not, but use to work. Now I noticed if I create script files for the vars I want exported and include them in /etc/profile.d/ the vars get set either way. Is this now the correct way to set system environment variables by using script files in the /etc/profile.d/ ????? Sorry, I couldn't find info on this, most info says to use /etc/profile

2 1

Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:504 Moderate CentOS i386 telnet - security update
by Peter Arremann 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

On Tuesday 14 June 2005 18:56, Tru Huynh wrote: > CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:504 > > telnet security update security update for CentOS 3 i386: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-504.html > > The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to > the mirrors: > > i386: > updates/i386/RPMS/telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm > updates/i386/RPMS/telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm > > source: > updates/SRPMS/telnet-0.17-26.EL3.3.src.rpm > > You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: > > yum update telnet\* > > Tru Thanks as always for the great work but it seems like this time you forgot to sign the package.. # yum update telnet\* Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: CentOS-3 - Addons Server: CentOS-3 - Base Server: CentOS-3 - Extras Server: CentOS-3 - Updates Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies Dependencies resolved I will do the following: [update: telnet-server 1:0.17-26.EL3.3.i386] [update: telnet 1:0.17-26.EL3.3.i386] Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages Error: Unsigned Package /var/cache/yum/update/packages/telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm Error: You may want to run yum clean or remove the file: /var/cache/yum/update/packages/telnet-server-0.17-26.EL3.3.i386.rpm Error: You may need to disable gpg checking to install this package Peter.

2 1

CentOS / BQ / PHP 4.3.9 with the mail() function
by Jon McCauley 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

Hey everyone! Got a little problem...with CentOS / BQ / PHP 4.3.9 with the mail() function I'm able to send mail using postfix directly from the command line, however when I try using the mail function of php no mail is being sent. This simple script works on all my older Cobalt Boxs. <? if($action=="send") { $to = 'me(a)domain.dot'; $subject = 'the subject'; $message = 'hello'; $headers = 'From: me(a)domain.dot' . "\r\n" . 'Reply-To: me(a)domain.dot' . "\r\n" . 'X-Mailer: PHP/' . phpversion(); mail($to, $subject, $message, $headers); ?> the queue looks like this.... Jun 14 11:47:45 bq0 sendmail[19390]: j5EFljEU019390: from=<>, size=1146, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Jun 14 11:47:45 bq0 sendmail[19389]: j5EFljk1019389: j5EFljk2019389: return to sender: User unknown Jun 14 11:47:45 bq0 sendmail[19390]: j5EFljEW019390: from=<>, size=3858, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200506141547.j5EFljk2019389(a)bq.ontarioservers.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Jun 14 11:47:45 bq0 sendmail[19389]: j5EFljk2019389: to=postmaster, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=32170, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j5EFljEW019390 Message accepted for delivery) Jun 14 11:47:45 bq0 sendmail[19391]: j5EFljEW019390: to=admin, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=34070, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent I did a some googling and found a post http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=27608 Any sujestons as what I should do .....I dont want to play with another script to get this done??....thanks in advance -- Best Regards, Jon McCauley

4 6

x11 update problems
by Rick Ziegler 15 Jun '05

15 Jun '05

Hello, I had a power outage during a 'yum update' and I think something may have gotten corrupted in the process. Trying to run 'yum update' again gives the following errors on the most recent x11 packages: Error: Missing Dependency: xorg-x11 = 6.8.1-23.EL is needed by package xorg-x11-Xvfb I've tried removing /var/yum/cache, and various yum and rpm command line options for these 2 and other x11 packages, but can't seem to get past this. Does anyone know how to re-install these latest x11 packages? I'm running CentOS release 4.0 (Final). Thanks in advance, and let me know if there's any additional info I can provide. ~Rick __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: [CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

From: Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> > Serious in some cases; not in the general case. Given the above, there has > to be something *widespread* that ext3 just *can't* do. Agreed. I think that's what it's going to take. Regardless, XFS is GPL, so we all benefit. Just the XFS dump, resize, etc... tools, as well as day 1 this'n that support. Just too tasty compared to the "work-in-progress" I always see on everything else. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

Re: [CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17(a)duke.edu> > The canonical reasons I've heard are 1) they don't want to spend the > money/time/resources to acquire enough XFS expertise to support it at the > Enterprise level I could think of 2 guys they could easily snatch away from SGI that could bring such experience -- pretty much the 2 behind much of the VFS in kernel 2.6 anyway (so great resources regardless). > and 2) besides, as of RHEL4 (they claim), XFS doesn't provide anything > ext3 already provides, so why bother. Feature-wise, probably not. The VFS in 2.6 brings a lot of former XFS-only features to _all_ filesystems. But I still see serious size limitations as well as scalability to Ext3 versus XFS. > Yes, I've pointed out on official Red Hat mailing lists that 2 is false > due (at least) to the issue of backing up ACLs (use star they say -- no > thanks, Well, Red Hat has shipped Jorg's "star" in RHL8 on-ward to address this. > say I), but I got no response to that. And I've got benchmarks > showing XFS pretty handily beating ext3 on nice new hardware, but I > don't have much faith that would get any response either. To me, I really could care less about benchmarks except when real performance issues arise. All throughout 2.4, every other filesystem -- Ext3, JFS (from OS/2**), ReiserFS, etc... required hack after hack after hack. XFS, with its "core" additions to kernel 2.4 provided _everything_ standard from day 1 -- Quotas, POSIX EA/ACLs, etc... It was ported directly from Irix, and was _entirely_ GPL -- which you'd figure that's something Red Hat likes. The only bug that it ever ran into, which resulted in XFS 1.1, was something that bit me on 2 /var filesystems. Otherwise XFS, like Ext3 but _unlike_ JFS or ReiserFS, benefits from being the _exact_ _same_ organization for 10+ years. Which means not only is its on-line operation well-trusted, but it's off-line fsck/repair as well (something that plagues ReiserFS heavily due to design focus). Because I could care less how a filesystem works when it works. I want to know what happens when its inconsistent, and a journal reply won't solve the problem. I trust e2fsck and xfs_repair. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

3 2

Re: [CentOS] A questiong about replacing my failing drive
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

Alexander Dalloz wrote: > On the Fedora user list the question came up whether dump & restore are > extended attributes aware. This is an issue i.e. when using SELinux. Do > the tools take care? Since 2002, this is the #1 reason I've been advocating that Red Hat adopt XFS as its' 2nd, officially supported filesystem. xfsdump for XFS does this, and always has. You don't have to use "getfacl" to save POSIX ACLs (although that was always an option, even back in the early 2.4.x days for XFS). Everything (short of SGI-integrated hardware API support) came over from Irix in XFS for Linux, and that included POSIX ACLs, Quotas, etc... This is in stark contrast from IBM JFS which came from OS/2 instead of AIX (because of the legal issues with Monterey), and ReiserFS is a non-traditional UNIX design (I won't go there, even if it is very innovative in most respects). Most of these features in kernel 2.6 ere thanx to the SGI XFS team, and the team also worked with the Ext3 and Linux & co. as of 2.5.3+ in ensuring POSIX EAs were uniform across all filesystems c/o the VFS. I haven't wanted to bother Tweedie and/or Red Hat in getting an explaination why they aren't looking at supporting XFS, but I think it would solve a lot of scalability issues. I always assumed it wasn't merely a "NIH" attitude, and they had real reasons for not wanting to support it until Ext3 proved to be a serious limitation for them. Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > That depends very much on what you are calling extended attributes. > I have no experience with SELinux, so I really can't make an > educated guess on what you are talking about. > Care to enlight me ? I have to be honest, I've never used xfsdump and verified SELinux attributes were preserved. But it should bring _all_ POSIX EAs with it. I've just typically relied on it for ACLs. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

2 1

A questiong about replacing my failing drive
by Doug Eubanks 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

First, I am not a RedHat or linux newbie. I simply have not had to do what I am getting ready to do, and I want to see if I am going to run into a problems... My HDA drive is failing (I can hear the occasional click from it and I am seeing Smart errors, the transfer rate is slow but all my data is there). I have 3 partitions on it, the /, /boot/ and my game servers (this is also the drive the bootloader is on). Will this proceedure work ok to replace it with the minimum of downtime/reinstalling A> Make bootable floppy B> Start in single user mode C> Create same partition structure on hew drive D> Move all files from old partitions to new partitions E> Switch drives F> Boot off floppy, mount, reinstall grub and boot manager on new drive G> Profit! Any hangups or snags doing it this way? Thanks, Doug Eubanks doug(a)simflex.com

17 61

SUCCESS! [CentOS] Help rebuilding kernel get mount error on reboot
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

John, Was there a reason for the (2) make oldconfigs? just curious This all worked rpm -i kernel.XXX.src.rpm cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS rpmbuild -bp --target i686 kernel.XXX.spec cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.9/linux-2.6.9 make mrproper cp /boot/config-2.6.9-11.EL .config make oldconfig make oldconfig make menuconfig Device Drivers -> Character Devices -> Serial Drivers change Max number of non legacy 8250_NR_UARTS to 36 make bzImage make modules make modules_install make install On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:23 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >/ Still no go.... />/ />/ I have downloaded the SRC rpm for kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.src.rpm />/ <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.1/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.src.rpm> />/ I did rpm -i kernel....src.rpm />/ cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS />/ rpmbuild -bp --target i686 kernel.xxx.src.rpm />/ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel.XXX/linux.XXX />/ make bzImage />/ make modules_install />/ make install />/ />/ When I reboot I get the same error about />/ />/ "mount: error 19 mounting ext3" />/ />/ Where should I go from here? / Go into the directory ... do: make mrproper cp /boot/config-xxxx . make oldconfig make oldconfig make menuconfig (adjust what you want) make bzImage make modules make modules_install make install

2 1

Help rebuilding kernel get mount error on reboot
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

Still no go.... I have downloaded the SRC rpm for kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.src.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.1/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.src.rpm> I did rpm -i kernel....src.rpm cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS rpmbuild -bp --target i686 kernel.xxx.src.rpm cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel.XXX/linux.XXX make bzImage make modules_install make install When I reboot I get the same error about "mount: error 19 mounting ext3" Where should I go from here? Thanks, Jerry

2 1

Help rebuilding kernel get mount error on reboot
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

I must have had an incomplete download- I downloaded again and no more error. Jerry ------------ john, when installing the src.rpm for the kernel it says bad key ID. jerry On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:32 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >// On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:05 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: //>/ > I am attempting to recompile the kernel with the following steps. />/ > />/ > Install kernel-sourcecode rpm />/ > />/ > cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.9-11.EL />/ > cp /boot/config-2.6.9-11.EL .config />/ > make menuconfig />/ > Device Drivers -> Character Devices -> Serial Drivers />/ > change Max number of non legacy 8250_NR_UARTS to 36 />/ > make bzImage />/ > make modules_install />/ > make install />/ > />/ > Then after rebooting and selecting my -custom image from the above compile />/ > />/ > "mount: error 19 mounting ext3" />/ > "mount: error 2 mounting none" />/ > />/ > Then the machine stops of source. />/ > />/ > What happended? How do I get my custom kernel to boot. />/ />/ Jerry, />/ />/ The kernel-sourcecode package (it is no-arch) doesn't always apply all />/ kernel patches for the arch in question. I actually think it is kind of />/ worthless and we will probably stop including it. />/ />/ Try this instead :) />/ />/ Download the kernel-xxxxx.src.rpm />/ />/ do: />/ />/ rpm -Uvh kernel-xxxxx.src.rpm />/ />/ go to the SPECS directory and do this: />/ />/ rpmbuild -bp --target i686 kernel-xxx.spec />/ />/ then go to the BUILD directory and go down to the kernel directory and />/ build there. />/ />/ (substitute the versions for xxxxx ... also

1 0

Help rebuilding kernel get mount error on reboot
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

john, when installing the src.rpm for the kernel it says bad key ID. jerry On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:32 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >/ On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:05 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: />/ > I am attempting to recompile the kernel with the following steps. />/ > />/ > Install kernel-sourcecode rpm />/ > />/ > cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.9-11.EL />/ > cp /boot/config-2.6.9-11.EL .config />/ > make menuconfig />/ > Device Drivers -> Character Devices -> Serial Drivers />/ > change Max number of non legacy 8250_NR_UARTS to 36 />/ > make bzImage />/ > make modules_install />/ > make install />/ > />/ > Then after rebooting and selecting my -custom image from the above compile />/ > />/ > "mount: error 19 mounting ext3" />/ > "mount: error 2 mounting none" />/ > />/ > Then the machine stops of source. />/ > />/ > What happended? How do I get my custom kernel to boot. />/ />/ Jerry, />/ />/ The kernel-sourcecode package (it is no-arch) doesn't always apply all />/ kernel patches for the arch in question. I actually think it is kind of />/ worthless and we will probably stop including it. />/ />/ Try this instead :) />/ />/ Download the kernel-xxxxx.src.rpm />/ />/ do: />/ />/ rpm -Uvh kernel-xxxxx.src.rpm />/ />/ go to the SPECS directory and do this: />/ />/ rpmbuild -bp --target i686 kernel-xxx.spec />/ />/ then go to the BUILD directory and go down to the kernel directory and />/ build there. />/ />/ (substitute the versions for xxxxx ... also use the correct --target for />/ the kernel you are trying to compile) This will get all the target />/ related patches applied./

1 0

Help rebuilding kernel get mount error on reboot
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

John, Thanks for the info. I am having trouble with the downloading of the src.rpm. Is that just on the mirrors somewhere or is there an easy place to grab the i686.src.rpm? I tried "rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.src.rpm" and got an error. Where on the mirrors is the i686.src.rpm? THanks, Jerry On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:05 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >/ I am attempting to recompile the kernel with the following steps. />/ />/ Install kernel-sourcecode rpm />/ />/ cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.9-11.EL />/ cp /boot/config-2.6.9-11.EL .config />/ make menuconfig />/ Device Drivers -> Character Devices -> Serial Drivers />/ change Max number of non legacy 8250_NR_UARTS to 36 />/ make bzImage />/ make modules_install />/ make install />/ />/ Then after rebooting and selecting my -custom image from the above compile />/ />/ "mount: error 19 mounting ext3" />/ "mount: error 2 mounting none" />/ />/ Then the machine stops of source. />/ />/ What happended? How do I get my custom kernel to boot. / Jerry, The kernel-sourcecode package (it is no-arch) doesn't always apply all kernel patches for the arch in question. I actually think it is kind of worthless and we will probably stop including it. Try this instead :) Download the kernel-xxxxx.src.rpm do: rpm -Uvh kernel-xxxxx.src.rpm go to the SPECS directory and do this: rpmbuild -bp --target i686 kernel-xxx.spec then go to the BUILD directory and go down to the kernel directory and build there. (substitute the versions for xxxxx ... also use the correct --target for the kernel you are trying to compile) This will get all the target related patches applied.

2 1

Help rebuilding kernel get mount error on reboot
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

THe size of the ramdisk is not even close to the original. Which since I am using the same config I would have thought it to be the same size. initrd.2.6.9-11.ELcustom 307K initrd.2.6.9-11.EL 390K Jerry ------------------------ That is supposed to happen in the "make install". In fact I looked at /boot and it is there. Jerry On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:05:36AM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >// I am attempting to recompile the kernel with the following steps. //>/ />/ Install kernel-sourcecode rpm />/ />/ cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.9-11.EL />/ cp /boot/config-2.6.9-11.EL .config />/ make menuconfig />/ Device Drivers -> Character Devices -> Serial Drivers />/ change Max number of non legacy 8250_NR_UARTS to 36 />/ make bzImage />/ make modules_install />/ make install / you forgot to rebuild the ramdisk ? mkinitrd ... Tru

1 0

Help rebuilding kernel get mount error on reboot
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

That is supposed to happen in the "make install". In fact I looked at /boot and it is there. Jerry On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:05:36AM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >/ I am attempting to recompile the kernel with the following steps. />/ />/ Install kernel-sourcecode rpm />/ />/ cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.9-11.EL />/ cp /boot/config-2.6.9-11.EL .config />/ make menuconfig />/ Device Drivers -> Character Devices -> Serial Drivers />/ change Max number of non legacy 8250_NR_UARTS to 36 />/ make bzImage />/ make modules_install />/ make install / you forgot to rebuild the ramdisk ? mkinitrd ... Tru --

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 4, Issue 7
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 mikmod - security update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 4 i386 mikmod - security update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2005:505 Low CentOS 4 i386 tcpdump - security update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2005:505 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 tcpdump - security update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2005:502 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 sysreport - security update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2005:502 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 sysreport - security update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2005:499 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gedit - security update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CESA-2005:499 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gedit - security update (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2005:410 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gftp - security update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CESA-2005:410 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gftp - security update (Johnny Hughes) 11. CESA-2005:357 Low CentOS 4 i386 gzip - security update (Johnny Hughes) 12. CESA-2005:357 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 gzip - security update (Johnny Hughes) 13. CESA-2005:357 Low CentOS 3 i386 gzip - security update (Tru Huynh) 14. CESA-2005:357 Low CentOS 3 x86_64 gzip - security update (Tru Huynh) 15. CESA-2005:410 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 gftp - security update (Tru Huynh) 16. CESA-2005:410 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 gftp - security update (Tru Huynh) 17. CESA-2005:499 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 gedit - security update (Tru Huynh) 18. CESA-2005:499 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 gedit - security update (Tru Huynh) 19. CESA-2005:502 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 sysreport - security update (Tru Huynh) 20. CESA-2005:502 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 sysreport - security update (Tru Huynh) 21. CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 3 i386 mikmod - security update (Tru Huynh) 22. CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 3 x86_64 mikmod - security update (Tru Huynh) 23. CESA-2005:357 Low CentOS 4 ia64 gzip - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 24. CESA-2005:410 Modrate CentOS 4 ia64 gftp - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 25. CESA-2005:499 Modrate CentOS 4 ia64 gedit - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 26. CESA-2005:502 Modrate CentOS 4 ia64 sysreport - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 27. CESA-2005:505 Low CentOS 4 ia64 tcpdump - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 28. CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 4 ia64 mikmod - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 29. CESA-2005:357 Low CentOS 3 ia64 gzip - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 30. CESA-2005:410 Modrate CentOS 3 ia64 gftp - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 31. CESA-2005:499 Modrate CentOS 3 ia64 gedit - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 32. CESA-2005:502 Modrate CentOS 3 ia64 sysreport - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 33. CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 3 ia64 mikmod - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 34. CESA-2005:357 Low CentOS 3 s390(x) gzip - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 35. CESA-2005:410 Modrate CentOS 3 s390(x) gftp - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 36. CESA-2005:499 Modrate CentOS 3 s390(x) gedit - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 37. CESA-2005:502 Modrate CentOS 3 s390(x) sysreport - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 38. CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 3 s390(x) mikmod - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 39. CESA-2005:506-01: Low CentOS 2 i386 mikmod security update (John Newbigin) 40. CESA-2005:502-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 sysreport security update (John Newbigin) 41. CESA-2005:495-01: Low CentOS 2 i386 rsh security update (John Newbigin) 42. CESA-2005:489-01: Low CentOS 2 i386 squid security update (John Newbigin) 43. CESA-2005:410-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 gftp security update (John Newbigin) 44. CESA-2005:357-01: Low CentOS 2 i386 gzip security update (John Newbigin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:12:37 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:506 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 mikmod - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <1118671957.22356.139.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:506 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-506.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: mikmod-3.1.6-32.EL4.x86_64.rpm mikmod-devel-3.1.6-32.EL4.x86_64.rpm src: mikmod-3.1.6-32.EL4.src.rpm

1 0

formatting a 3 terabyte partition
by Phuoc Hong 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

hi. i'm hitting a wall each time i try to format a 3 terabyte partition. i'm able to create the partition using parted but whenever i try to create a 3 terabyte xfs or jfs or ext3 filesystem, the mounted filesystem created is only 1 terabyte. i tried centos x86 and x86_64 4.0 but i always hit a 1 terabyte limit. please help.

4 7

DNS & DHCP Management System
by Petr Klíma 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

Hello A few (or a lot) of us supports larger corporate networks. I would like know your opinion/solution based on CentOS. No Win auto/dynamic/smart (WI|D)NS/DHCP How do you manage DNS&DHCP (the informations filled in, not the server software) for hundreds or thousands of computers? For our network, just now we use homebrewed scripts, but they are getting unsufficient (cca. 700 machines). I found this: http://sauron.jyu.fi/ = Sauron - A Free DNS & DHCP Management System What are references for that? Good, bad, sufficient? Do you use something similar? Petr Klíma JIHOMILK a.s. Rudolfovská 246/83 370 50 České Budějovice Czech Rpublic phone: +420 389 136 209 e-mail: petr.klima(a)jihomilk.cz

9 13

Ultra Monkey 3 and Centos 4
by Ajay Sharma 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

Ultra Monkey 3 has been released and the release notes say it's compatible with RHEL3. IS anyone running it on a CentOS-4 machine? --Ajay

1 0

how can I manage multiple repositories with yum.
by Robin Mordasiewicz 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

I recently moved away from apt, becuase I could not make it work with multiple x86_64, because there are many duplicate packages from both rchitectures that get installed, and I could not make apt-get work. Someone suggested that I try yum, which does work, but I am having a heck of a time managing multiple repositories. It was easy with apt, being able to pin priorities to repositories and packages, but I cannot make yum work as nicely with pinning. I can exclude and such but most of the time it does not work. I wish I could go back to apt while using x86_64. If anyone has got any tips for either getting apt to work with multiple architectures, or pinning with yum please let me know.

2 4

recompile 1 kernel modules
by Jerry Geis 14 Jun '05

14 Jun '05

Sir, After looking closely the 8250.c is not a module. It is compiled into the kernel. What is the shortes method to compile that file and rebuild what is needed to get it running. Thanks for your help. Jerry Am Mo, den 13.06.2005 schrieb Jerry Geis um 20:56: >/ How do I recomile just 1 kernel module. I want to recompile />/ serial/8250.c / >/ Jerry / copy&paste from the Fedora Core 4 release notes: 6.2.2.4. Building Only Kernel Modules An exploded source tree is not required to build a kernel module, such as your own device driver, against the currently in-use kernel. For example, to build the foo.ko module, create the following Makefile in the directory containing the foo.c file: obj-m := foo.o KDIR := /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build PWD := $(shell pwd) default: $(MAKE) -C $(KDIR) M=$(PWD) modules Issue the make command to build the foo.ko module. Alexander

2 1

RE: [CentOS] Php package for Microsoft-SQL -- integrated layer 2 + layer 3 name services
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 13 Jun '05

13 Jun '05

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> > But if it 'knows' which of two nodes claiming a name is the correct > one, then it must have been preconfigured in a way that wouldn't > have required listening to the broadcast in the first place. How > does centralizing the service help resolve a conflict correctly? Via several options: 1. First and foremost, those naming conventions 2. Reserved MAC address for blocks of the IP subnet 3. Historical MAC address assignment of the name/IP 4. Digital signatures of the client (both BIND 9 and reverse engineered ADS-DNS) These is just some of many approaches that can _only_ be accomplished in an unified layer 2 + layer 3 server. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

1 0

RE: [CentOS] Php package for Microsoft-SQL -- integrated layer 2 + layer 3 name services
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 13 Jun '05

13 Jun '05

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> > Does anything exist that has that 'basic logic'? The legacy forms > work and scale worldwide because the authority to use names is > carefully delegated. If two self-issued names are broadcast on > the same network, who wins? What if they are on different subnets > and can't see each other but you try to integrate them with such > a tool? What if they normally live on different networks but are > mobile and eventually collide? I'd really prefer not to let anyone's > laptop claim to be the company email server and get away with it. Which is why you need a _centralized_ layer 2 + layer 3 server to prevent this. If it is the centralized DNS and WINS, then all Windows and UNIX nodes trust it first and foremost, even if a rogue NetBIOS node is braodcasting. The logic of the server would not only not proxy such a node, but it would quickly report its MAC address as a "problem." -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

2 1

recompile 1 kernel modules
by Jerry Geis 13 Jun '05

13 Jun '05

How do I recomile just 1 kernel module. I want to recompile serial/8250.c I tried typing make in the serial directory but that did not do it? Thanks, Jerry

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss