- Discuss - lists.centos.org

Max FIFO buffer size - Log Reporting
by Lee W 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

Hi Everyone, I need to be able to create a summary report of all relevent syslog entries that is then emailed weekly. The idea I have for this is to pipe the syslog entries (logged from many hosts UNIX-Like and Windows) out to a a named pipe (say /var/log/logpipe) that is then read periodically by a perl script started from cron. The perl script then filters the log entries (probably using regular expressions) and takes the appopriate action based on the severity of the error (i.e. log to summary file, or immediately email admin). My main concern is that if a lot of entries get logged the FIFO buffer may overload therefore loosing entries. Does anyone know what the size of the FIFO buffer is (or how it can be configured) or maybe there is a better way to do something like what I'm trying. TIA Regards Lee W

3 2

Re: Re[4]: [CentOS] Vncserver not serving up my gnome desktop, just a fancy terminal!
by Lee Parmeter 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

resolution using realvnc native X Support, see vino thread. --- Lee Parmeter <leejpar(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > --- William Hooper <whooperhsd3(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > Lee Parmeter wrote: > > [snip] > > > The Vino package was installed on my installation by > > > default, but I am unable to connect to the CentOS 4 > > server from a client > > > machine running Ubuntu Hoary (gnome 2.10). The is > > rejected. Tried > > > vncviewer using hostname:0 per documentation. So, I > am > > now wondering what > > > else needs to be done to enable remote connects to > > succeed. I did > > > configure the "remote desktop" settings per > discussion > > in the thread. > > > > Check the usual suspects? Is your firewall configured > > correctly? Is vino > > actually listening (netstat)? > > No firewall. The viewer even fails when run on the server > as: vncviewer localhost:0 > > Since I am on a trusted network, I added an ALL statement > ot hosts.allow for my client machine's ip. > > > > > I don't know vino specifically, does it leverage the > VNC > > X module? > > Yes, I think that's what is needed. Some statements are > required in the xorg.conf file to enable vnc support. I > ran > across some info in this area on the Ubuntu forums. > > > > I would just use the standard Xvnc and hostname:1, > > which is > > > working, but when I login via vncviewer I am unable > to > > do any root > > > configuration via gnome. > > > > I can't say I've seen this issue. Do you have a Gnome > > session open on the > > console at the same time? > > Not always, generally the user is logged out of the > server. > > I know Gnome doesn't like > > that. > > I am being to wonder if vino really works! > Why is there no doc or man page? > > > -- > > William Hooper > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > -- > Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin > http://www.linXos.com > Linux Registered User #337161 > > 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison > > The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a > Republic! > > God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His > government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection > around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin http://www.linXos.com Linux Registered User #337161 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a Republic! God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

using vino on centos 4
by Joe Pruett 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

sorry i figured this out after deleting the other parts of the thread. just run vino-preferences as the user who runs the main x display. it will have various options to enable and as soon as you do that you can get to hostname:0 via vnc. works quite well.

1 0

MIrrored drives won't boot after installation
by Chris Mason (Lists) 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

I have a p4 motherboard with 2 ide interfaces, I connect 2 40 GB drives as hda and hdc, I install Centos 4 from a CDROM, and partition the drives as 2 x raid partition each plus a swap partition on hda, the make md0 and md1 to install /boot and / respectively. Install goes well, everything looks great, go to reboot from drives, and all I get is "grub" but no boot. I have tried this ten times, doesn't seem I can get around it. I have to configure this server so that the drives are mirrored. I have installed redhat 9 in this configuration without problems. What am I doing wrong? Chris Mason www.anguillaguide.com

3 2

Firefox question
by Collins Richey 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

Just curious. I've noticed with the 1.0.3 release (and almost every recent dot release) Firefox becomes unstable until you preserve your bookmarks and blow away the .mozilla/firefox directory. Has anyone heard whether the mozilla developers ever intend to fix this behavior? -- Collins When I saw the Iraqi people voting three weeks ago, 8 million of them, it was the start of a new Arab world.... The Berlin Wall has fallen. - Lebanese Druze leader Walid Jumblatt

2 1

Re: Re[4]: [CentOS] Vncserver not serving up my gnome desktop, just a fancy terminal!
by Lee Parmeter 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

--- William Hooper <whooperhsd3(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > Lee Parmeter wrote: > [snip] > > The Vino package was installed on my installation by > > default, but I am unable to connect to the CentOS 4 > server from a client > > machine running Ubuntu Hoary (gnome 2.10). The is > rejected. Tried > > vncviewer using hostname:0 per documentation. So, I am > now wondering what > > else needs to be done to enable remote connects to > succeed. I did > > configure the "remote desktop" settings per discussion > in the thread. > > Check the usual suspects? Is your firewall configured > correctly? Is vino > actually listening (netstat)? No firewall. The viewer even fails when run on the server as: vncviewer localhost:0 Since I am on a trusted network, I added an ALL statement ot hosts.allow for my client machine's ip. > > I don't know vino specifically, does it leverage the VNC > X module? Yes, I think that's what is needed. Some statements are required in the xorg.conf file to enable vnc support. I ran across some info in this area on the Ubuntu forums. > > I would just use the standard Xvnc and hostname:1, > which is > > working, but when I login via vncviewer I am unable to > do any root > > configuration via gnome. > > I can't say I've seen this issue. Do you have a Gnome > session open on the > console at the same time? Not always, generally the user is logged out of the server. I know Gnome doesn't like > that. I am being to wonder if vino really works! Why is there no doc or man page? > -- > William Hooper > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin http://www.linXos.com Linux Registered User #337161 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a Republic! God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

RE: [CentOS] NFS insanity
by Plant, Dean 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

Mark Weaver wrote: > Collins Richey wrote: >> On 4/24/05, Mark Weaver <mdw1982(a)mdw1982.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've got some insanity with mounting an NFS share that before >>> reloading my workstation afresh worked perfectly, but now refuses >>> to mount. >>> >>> Actually there are two servers with shares mounted. >>> (1) Mandrake 10.0 file server - two shares - mount perfectly >>> (2) Fedora Core 3 - one share - can't mount to save my life! >>> >>> My workstation is CentOS 4. I reloaded it to get rid of the FC3 >>> installation at the front of the main drive and recover some space >>> on the second drive moving CentOS to the main drive. Everything >>> else works wonderfully as advertised. The following is the only >>> feedback I'm getting when attempting to mount the share from the >>> FC3 server. (the shares on the file server mount perfectly) >>> >>> SERVER: >>> Apr 24 09:43:41 mail rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from >>> 192.168.0.252:921 for /var/www (/var/www) >>> >>> CLIENT: >>> Mounting NFS filesystems: mount: 192.168.0.4:/var/www failed, >>> reason given by server: Permission denied >>> >> >> >> What does your fstab entry for the share look like? >> > > sorry about that... I knew I'd forget something. > > the fstab entry on the client machine appears thusly: > 192.168.0.4:/var/www /mnt/www nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,auto,hard 0 0 > > The exports file on the server appears as this: > /var/www 192.168.0.252(rw) > > (the IP of the client machine is 192.168.0.252) Have you tried to mount another test share on the server with no options/IP restrictions? Dean.

5 6

A 'simple' problem?
by Nigel Kendrick 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

Here's one for you if you have the time: I very stupidly killed the wrong process on a server on a remote site on Friday and now I cannot ssh login to it! It's not a major problem as it's main functions are as a file and print sharer (samba) and to run postfix/mailscanner, and I can have someone on site reboot the server when they start work on Monday, but I was wondering whether I could 'get in' by other means to reboot it - so far I have tried the following without luck: Simultaneous login requests to 'reach' a listening login as I think I've only screwed up pts0 A VNC connection to a machine on site and then using telnet (nope, telnet disabled) A VNC connection to a machine on site and then a VNC connection to the server (VNC not running on this one). Any suggestions to issue a remote reboot - as I said, it's not a major issue as I can have the server rebooted by someone on site. Thanks Nigel Kendrick

4 3

Re: Re[4]: [CentOS] Vncserver not serving up my gnome desktop, just a fancy terminal!
by Lee Parmeter 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

--- "Jerry57 (GMail)" <jerry57(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Noah, > > CentOS seems to have it, I will be taking a look at it > later on > today. Thanks for the tip. > > jer > > Sunday, April 24, 2005, 9:58:37 AM, you wrote: > > > applications >> preferences > remote desktop > > > "Vino is a VNC server for GNOME. It allows remote users > to > > connect to a running GNOME session using VNC." > > > I have it here, but then again I have added some apt > repos so I'm not > > sure if it's a stock centos package. The Vino package was installed on my installation by default, but I am unable to connect to the CentOS 4 server from a client machine running Ubuntu Hoary (gnome 2.10). The is rejected. Tried vncviewer using hostname:0 per documentation. So, I am now wondering what else needs to be done to enable remote connects to succeed. I did configure the "remote desktop" settings per discussion in the thread. I would just use the standard Xvnc and hostname:1, which is working, but when I login via vncviewer I am unable to do any root configuration via gnome. In other distros, I have not had this problem. I run my file server without a monitor, so I need full access to root settings from gnome just like I have when logged in non-root using a monitor and keyboard. Lee > -- > USE THE BEST . . . > > Linux for servers . . . > > Macintosh for graphics . . . > > Palm for mobility . . . > > Windows for solitaire! > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Centos 3.4 Problem
by Steven Vishoot 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

--- Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)iki.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:44:43PM -0400, Orlando > Rubino Gala wrote: > > Once installed Centos 3.4 and restart the server > and to give error 2umount > > /var > > What it can be? > > > I'd say it's the audit keeping the /var busy (from > laus), but it's just > a thought. That package does have a lot of bad karma > in it ..... > > > -- > Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/ > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > i had a similar one to this, but mine happened after i updated my bios and happen to change some stuff in the bios related to memory. that could of been a fluke though, worth mentioning. after fixing settings i did not have anymore problems. Steven "On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section, it said 'Requires Windows or better'. So I installed Linux." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

RE: [CentOS] losing NFS connection
by Angelo Machils 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

> > >-----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Angelo Machils >> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:28 PM >> To: centos(a)centos.org >> Subject: [CentOS] losing NFS connection >> >> Hello there! >> >> Perhaps this is a little off-topic, but I notice this only on the > > >Centos > > >>> box. >>> I'm running Centos 4 on an AMD64 which has the following entries in >> >> >the > > >>> fstab to connect to NFS shares on a Fedora3 box: >>> 192.168.1.12:/home/angelo/ /home/angelo/NFS_share1 nfs >>> rw,addr=192.168.1.12 0 0 >>> 192.168.1.12:/home/angelo/data /home/angelo/NFS_share2 nfs >>> rw,addr=192.168.1.12 0 0 >>> 192.168.1.12:/home/angelo/data2 /home/angelo/NFS_share3 nfs >>> rw,addr=192.168.1.12 0 0 >>> I have opened ports 111 (TCP), 648 (TCP), 651 (TCP) and 2049 (TCP and >>> UDP) in iptables on the FC3 box and I can connect to them, but after a >>> while I seem to loose the connection to the shares. >> >> > >[snip] > > > >>> >>> Anyone any idea what is wrong here? >> >> > >Just a thought but have you hard-coded speed and duplex all the way >through? Don't trust auto-negotiation. > >-- >Marc > I have opened the firewall on the server all the way for the client (and also the other way around) but it makes no difference. After a while I see these messages again in the /var/log/messages on the client: Apr 25 21:38:02 solaris kernel: RPC: garbage, exit EIO Apr 25 21:38:33 solaris last message repeated 70 times Apr 25 21:39:34 solaris last message repeated 122 times Apr 25 21:40:01 solaris last message repeated 55 times Apr 25 21:40:01 solaris crond(pam_unix)[4701]: session opened for user root by (uid=0) Apr 25 21:40:01 solaris crond(pam_unix)[4701]: session closed for user root Apr 25 21:40:02 solaris kernel: RPC: garbage, exit EIO And this keeps repeating...... No entries on the server though..... Which file do I have to edit in order to set the NIC into fixed state. I know that I can use mii-tool to check and set, but is this permanent, even after a reboot? Thanks in advance, Angelo

1 0

rebuilding anaconda for centos 4.0
by David Thompson 26 Apr '05

26 Apr '05

Hi all: I'm trying to rebuild the anaconda installer for Centos 4.0 (i386) to add some RPMs and do some other things, and I've run into a problem. I've done lots of anaconda rebuilds for Tao Linux 1.0, and I'm bringing those bits forward into Centos 4.0. The all-knowing web hasn't turned up anything useful. It looks like the PXE-loaded kernel unpacked and mounted the initrd OK, but then things went awry (quickly). Anyone seen this on a PXE boot of an anaconda build? <snip> RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). VFS: Cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown-block(3,2) Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(3,2) Help or pointers to applicable docs very welcome. -- Dave Thompson ( thomas(at)cs(dot)wisc(dot)edu ) Associate Researcher Department of Computer Science University of Wisconsin-Madison http://www.cs.wisc.edu/(twiddle)thomas 1210 West Dayton Street Madison, WI 53706-1685 --

2 1

Help!!Firefox for CentOS 3
by Hugh Tollan 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

saw a post the other day with a link for the rpm for the latest Firefox build for CentOS 3..lost it..anyone copy me in on the post or send me the link?? thanks _________________________________________________________________ It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

4 3

bugs with large partitions
by John Moylan 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I installed centos4 on a raid system with 7 400GB Hitachi SATA disks in RAID 5 on the 3Ware card. I set up a 2.2TB EXT3 Partition /opt. After the install I rebooted and the system went straight into maintenance mode....! The system reported a problem with /opt, but I was able to mount it manually and init 4 with no problems. However a reboot dropped me straight back into maintanence mode ??? Back in maintenance mode again I tried to used parted to create a partition, but it says it can't manage a partition greater than 1.72TB - I thought parted could do > 2TB fs's? parted output below: [root@localhost ~]# parted GNU Parted 1.6.19 Copyright (C) 1998 - 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. Using /dev/sda (parted) print Disk geometry for /dev/sda: 0.000-2288754.000 megabytes Disk label type: msdos Minor Start End Type Filesystem Flags 1 0.031 101.975 primary ext3 boot 2 101.975 5098.754 primary linux-swap 3 5098.755 7091.191 primary ext3 4 7091.191 191600.624 extended 5 7091.222 9083.627 logical ext3 6 9083.659 11076.064 logical ext3 (parted) mkpart logical ext3 11076.065 2288754 Warning: You requested to create a partition at 11076.065-2288754.000Mb. The closest Parted can manage is 11076.095-191595.520Mb. OK/Cancel? Any one have experience/ideas? Regards, John -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCbQjfHgDLUzVQ7OARAjNJAJ9DRwfUCS8eWjHndOToFpytfEp8swCgxEBV HPyZBViU+lb4XxeKiGZSqBo= =/CEl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ****************************************************************************** The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please note that emails to, from and within RTÉ may be subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1997 and may be liable to disclosure. ******************************************************************************

3 2

RE: [CentOS] losing NFS connection
by Bowie Bailey 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

From: Marc Powell [mailto:marc@ena.com] > From: Joshua Baker-LePain > > On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 at 2:53pm, Marc Powell wrote > > > > > > Anyone any idea what is wrong here? > > > > > > Just a thought but have you hard-coded speed and duplex all the way > > > through? Don't trust auto-negotiation. > > > > Just a dissenting opinion here on that last bit. No less a source than > > Donald Becker often advises *strongly* against disabling auto-negotiation. > > Yes, some switches *cough*Cisco*cough* historically did it very badly. > > But that was then, not now. And, AIUI, it's actually part of the gbe > > standard. > > Sure, let me rephrase my original wording -- "I don't trust > auto-negitiation." =) I say that for two reasons -- The problem I've found with hard-coding speed and duplex is that it MUST be done on both sides of the link. If one side is hard-coded and the other side is trying to negotiate, the speed will be detected properly, but the duplex will not. This can result in one side of the link running at full and the other side running at half. Obviously, problems will occur. If both sides support (and are configured for) negotiation, there shouldn't be a problem. Likewise, if both sides are hard-coded, there shouldn't be a problem. Bowie

1 0

RE: [CentOS] losing NFS connection
by Marc Powell 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Joshua Baker-LePain > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 7:59 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: RE: [CentOS] losing NFS connection > > On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 at 2:53pm, Marc Powell wrote > > > > Anyone any idea what is wrong here? > > > > Just a thought but have you hard-coded speed and duplex all the way > > through? Don't trust auto-negotiation. > > Just a dissenting opinion here on that last bit. No less a source than > Donald Becker often advises *strongly* against disabling auto-negotiation. > Yes, some switches *cough*Cisco*cough* historically did it very badly. > But that was then, not now. And, AIUI, it's actually part of the gbe > standard. Sure, let me rephrase my original wording -- "I don't trust auto-negitiation." =) I say that for two reasons -- I work with a very large network consisting of tens of thousands of machines connecting to a hodge-podge of switches and routers from many different vendors. It is my personal experience that auto-negotiation does not result in optimum or even compatible speed/duplex settings often enough to be trustworthy. I've experienced this as recently as last week with brand new Cisco equipment and Dell computers running CentOS 3.4 (100/Full on one end, 100/Half on the other). I've seen the problem with Alteon and Foundry equipment recently as well. It may be part of the standard but as anyone who's been around a while knows, each vendor's interpretation of a standard can vary enough to be problematic. Second, as an administrator I want to do everything in my power to make sure the devices I manage are going to run smoothly. Why leave something as simple but as problematic as speed/duplex settings to chance or trust when it is a simple task to force it to be that which works best in the networking environment that the device lives in? For example, if auto-negotiation comes up with 100/half, 10/full or 10/half and every other local device is 100/full or vice-versa, the network is operating at less than peak efficiency and that can also result in odd problems. -- Marc

1 0

losing NFS connection
by Angelo Machils 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

Hello there! Perhaps this is a little off-topic, but I notice this only on the Centos box. I'm running Centos 4 on an AMD64 which has the following entries in the fstab to connect to NFS shares on a Fedora3 box: 192.168.1.12:/home/angelo/ /home/angelo/NFS_share1 nfs rw,addr=192.168.1.12 0 0 192.168.1.12:/home/angelo/data /home/angelo/NFS_share2 nfs rw,addr=192.168.1.12 0 0 192.168.1.12:/home/angelo/data2 /home/angelo/NFS_share3 nfs rw,addr=192.168.1.12 0 0 I have opened ports 111 (TCP), 648 (TCP), 651 (TCP) and 2049 (TCP and UDP) in iptables on the FC3 box and I can connect to them, but after a while I seem to loose the connection to the shares. When I try to move into them while in a console I get the error: bash: cd: NFS_share1: Input/output error In Nautilus I don't even see the directories anymore and in /var/log/messages I get this error msgs: Apr 24 20:17:02 solaris kernel: RPC: garbage, exit EIO There are not entries in the /var/log/messages on the FC3 box. If I manually umount them and then mount them again, I can use them again for a while.... The exports file on the FC3 box looks like this: [root@imhotep etc]# more exports /home/angelo 192.168.1.*(rw,sync) /home/angelo/data 192.168.1.*(rw,sync) /home/angelo/data2 192.168.1.*(rw,sync) Anyone any idea what is wrong here? Thanks in advance, Angelo

4 4

APM on SMP kernel
by Nigel Kendrick 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

I'm Currently running Centos 3.4 on an old Dell PowerEdge with dual PIII-450 processors. I know from searching that 'APM is not SMP safe' and so when I choose to reboot the server someone has to hit the power button to power down and then restart it. Most of the Web-based info I have found on APM and SMP is dated 2000-2002 so can anyone update me on whether there is now any way round this to allow an unattended reboot? Thanks Nigel Kendrick

2 2

RE: [CentOS] APM on SMP kernel
by Mark A. Lewis 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

Not sure exactly what I am using (default install), but I run Cent on at least a half dozen machines with 2-8 CPUs and issue the reboot command with no problems. > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Kendrick > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:56 AM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: [CentOS] APM on SMP kernel > > I'm Currently running Centos 3.4 on an old Dell PowerEdge > with dual PIII-450 processors. > > I know from searching that 'APM is not SMP safe' and so when > I choose to reboot the server someone has to hit the power > button to power down and then restart it. > > Most of the Web-based info I have found on APM and SMP is > dated 2000-2002 so can anyone update me on whether there is > now any way round this to allow an unattended reboot? > > Thanks > > Nigel Kendrick > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous > content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

1 0

NFS insanity
by Mark Weaver 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

Hi all, I've got some insanity with mounting an NFS share that before reloading my workstation afresh worked perfectly, but now refuses to mount. Actually there are two servers with shares mounted. (1) Mandrake 10.0 file server - two shares - mount perfectly (2) Fedora Core 3 - one share - can't mount to save my life! My workstation is CentOS 4. I reloaded it to get rid of the FC3 installation at the front of the main drive and recover some space on the second drive moving CentOS to the main drive. Everything else works wonderfully as advertised. The following is the only feedback I'm getting when attempting to mount the share from the FC3 server. (the shares on the file server mount perfectly) SERVER: Apr 24 09:43:41 mail rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from 192.168.0.252:921 for /var/www (/var/www) CLIENT: Mounting NFS filesystems: mount: 192.168.0.4:/var/www failed, reason given by server: Permission denied ^^^ happens when running the command "service netfs restart[start]" I've researched this exaustively on Google and have come up with nuttin. what makes no sense at all to me is that it worked perfectly before on my previous centos 4 installation and has only developed this behavior since reinstalling and upgrading KDE to KDE-3.4 although I can't see what was in there that might have affected netfs/nfs share mounting since the other two shares from the Mandrake server do work. Any help will be greatly appreciated. -- Mark ----------------------------------------------------------- Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R) Linux User Since 1996 Powered by Mandrake Linux 8.2, 10.0 & CentOS 4

6 9

Question - Cluster and GFS package
by Hector . 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

Hello! I am looking for clumanager and gfs packages in the CentOs 4, I dont know if in cd 1..4 Somebody know if those package are distribute in this version or I can use the RHEL 4 package? Thanks! -- _______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox. Powered by Outblaze

3 2

different MAC address, ignoring
by Les Mikesell 25 Apr '05

25 Apr '05

I think a recent update changed the behavior of ifup on systems where the drives were moved or cloned and at boot time have a different MAC address than the one found in the corresponding interface file under /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts or /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/default/. Now the interface is ignored with an error message about having a different MAC address than expected. I frequently update remote machines by shipping configured swappable drives so this becomes an interesting problem. However, it seems to be intended behavior so instead of reporting it as a bug, I'd like to know the correct procedure to prepare a drive to run in an unknown target machine and where this might be documented. -- Les Mikesell les(a)futuresource.com

3 3

Re: [CentOS] Vncserver not serving up my gnome desktop, just a fancy terminal!
by Lee Parmeter 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

I figured this one out, just comment out everything in ~/.vnc/xstartup then add: gnome-session & Lee --- Lee Parmeter <leejpar(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I have the vncserver running on CentOS 4, but when I log > in > using vncviewer from another box, I don't see my gnome > desktop, just a fancy terminal. I suspect I need to edit > the ~/.vnc "xstartup file, but what do I add to fix this. > On all other distros I have tried, the vncserver serves > up > my gnome desktop by default. > > -- > Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin > http://www.linXos.com > Linux Registered User #337161 > > 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison > > The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a > Republic! > > God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His > government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection > around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin http://www.linXos.com Linux Registered User #337161 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a Republic! God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

4 6

Kylix
by Franki 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

Hi guys, Has anyone had any luck getting Kylix working on CENTOS4? The list ofdependencies is extensive. rgds Franki

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. firefox 1.0.3 for CentOS-3 i386 and CentOS-3/x86_64 (Tru Huynh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:16:01 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] firefox 1.0.3 for CentOS-3 i386 and CentOS-3/x86_64 To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050423161601.GA1075(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Merged the XOS Team fixes for firefox 1.0 and made a CentOS-3 version of few hours ago released CentOS-4 update. The CentOS-3 version is actually only .spec file mod from CentOS-4, so it should be pretty much same. This should build for any other supported CentOS arch too. files: centosplus/i386/RPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.i386.rpm centosplus/x86_64/RPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.x86_64.rpm source: centosplus/i386/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm centosplus/x86_64/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm Build from Pasi's src.rpm Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

Re: [Centos] Modem - dial-up connection
by Alexander Dalloz 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

Am Mi, den 30.03.2005 schrieb Justin Kelly um 2:04: > Im having problems setting up a dialup connect in CentOS PPC > > I get the following error when attempting to use wvdial (modem set as > /dev/ttyS0) > > --> Cannot open /dev/ttyS0: input/output error > > Ive tried kppp but ive had not luck > > Anyone know how to fix this? > > normally I would use pppconfig and pon/poff but havent been able to > use/find them, are they install by default? This isn't Debian :) system-config-network - as you seem to run X. Explanation you can find in the documentation http://www.centos.org/docs/4/html/rhel-sag-en-4/s1-network-config-modem.html > Justin Kelly Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp Serendipity 03:29:52 up 56 min, 16 average: 0.09, 0.21, 0.78

2 2

Re: [CentOS] apt repo's for centos
by Lee Parmeter 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

thanks! --- Mark Weaver <mdw1982(a)mdw1982.com> wrote: > Lee Parmeter wrote: > > I downloaded and installed apt and synaptic using yum > ok, > > but are there corresponding apt repo's for the yum > ones? If > > so, what are they? > > > > -- > > Hi Lee, > > Try these out. Just place the following lines in > /etc/apt/sources.list > > rpm http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat > redhat/el4/i386 stable > rpm http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat all stable > > rpm http://mirror.centos.org/ centos/4.0/apt/i386 os > updates extras contrib > rpm-src http://mirror.centos.org/ centos/4.0/apt/i386 os > updates extras > contrib > > -- > Mark > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R) > Linux User Since 1996 > Powered by Mandrake Linux 8.2, 10.0 & RHEL 4 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin http://www.linXos.com Linux Registered User #337161 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a Republic! God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

mii-tool and cbq in Centos 3.3
by Marco Garza 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

Has anyone had any issues using cbq while using mii-tool in Centos 3.3? Just setup a gateway server and cbq has no affect on bandwidth. mii-tool is being used to force one of the nics to 100 full duplex. TIA -Marco Garza

1 0

Vncserver not serving up my gnome desktop, just a fancy terminal!
by Lee Parmeter 24 Apr '05

24 Apr '05

I have the vncserver running on CentOS 4, but when I log in using vncviewer from another box, I don't see my gnome desktop, just a fancy terminal. I suspect I need to edit the ~/.vnc "xstartup file, but what do I add to fix this. On all other distros I have tried, the vncserver serves up my gnome desktop by default. -- Lee Parmeter Emperor, linXos - The Flying Penguin http://www.linXos.com Linux Registered User #337161 'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison The United States is NOT a democracy, it was founded as a Republic! God is not a republican or a democrat nor is His government a democracy! - Lee Parmeter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: [CentOS-announce] firefox 1.0.3 for CentOS-3/s390(x)
by Michael Boman 23 Apr '05

23 Apr '05

On 4/23/05, Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)iki.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > Merged the XOS Team fixes for firefox 1.0 and made a CentOS-3 version > of few hours ago released CentOS-4 update. > > The CentOS-3 version is actually only .spec file mod from CentOS-4, so > it should be pretty much same. > > ... that is IF someone is crazy enought to run firefox under hercules > or real iron - at least you can as the binary is available :) > > s390: > centosplus/s390/RPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.s390.rpm > > s390x: > centosplus/s390x/RPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.s390x.rpm > > source: > centosplus/s390/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm > centosplus/s390x/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm > Can anyone do it for x86? It's working fine to just re-compile the .src.rpm, except desktop-file-utils is not listed as a build dependency (but is required to build it). Best regards Michael Boman

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 2, Issue 12
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 23 Apr '05

23 Apr '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. firefox 1.0.3 for CentOS-3/s390(x) (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2005:293 Important CentOS 3 ia64 kernel - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2005:293 Important CentOS 3 x86_64, ia32e kernel - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2005:293 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) kernel - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2005:293 Important CentOS 3 i386 kernel - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:38:09 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)iki.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] firefox 1.0.3 for CentOS-3/s390(x) To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050422193809.GE11443(a)core.upi.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Merged the XOS Team fixes for firefox 1.0 and made a CentOS-3 version of few hours ago released CentOS-4 update. The CentOS-3 version is actually only .spec file mod from CentOS-4, so it should be pretty much same. ... that is IF someone is crazy enought to run firefox under hercules or real iron - at least you can as the binary is available :) s390: centosplus/s390/RPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.s390.rpm s390x: centosplus/s390x/RPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.s390x.rpm source: centosplus/s390/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm centosplus/s390x/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/

1 0

OT: Powered by CentOS
by Franki 23 Apr '05

23 Apr '05

Hi guys, I was wondering if there was any powered by CentOS logo's available for use on websites that are 'powered by CentOS' Sorta like this mandrake one: http://htmlfixit.com/icons/medbutton.png Always a good idea to promote the cause so to speak and once I've ugpraded my web server I'll be changing the icon and if there isn't a CentOS version, I'll have a go at making one. regards Franki

2 2

RE: [CentOS] X330 Keyboard/box dies on install 4.0, not on 3.4
by Graham Johnston 23 Apr '05

23 Apr '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Graham Johnston > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 6:49 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: RE: [CentOS] X330 Keyboard/box dies on install 4.0, > not on 3.4 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org > > [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karl S. Katzke > > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 5:57 PM > > To: centos(a)centos.org > > Subject: [CentOS] X330 Keyboard/box dies on install 4.0, not on 3.4 > > > > I've got a handful of IBM X330's at my colo and another > couple at the > > office for testing purposes. Currently, they're running > > CentOS 3.4 and > > are very happy doing so. The 3.4 install was perfectly seamless. > > > > When I tried to upgrade one of my test machines to 4.0, the > keyboard > > died once I got into the install every single time once I boot to > > anaconda from the CD. It dies as soon as the blue-background screen > > appears, and it dies no matter which selection I choose at > isolinux. > > (I'm sure the system isn't locked because the keyboard is > > dead while the > > SCSI driver is loading, and the system keeps chugging along happily > > until it needs input.) > > The CD passes all of the tests I can apply to it, from > > checksum to media > > check, and has been used to install a half dozen machines > > both before or > > since. I also downloaded a new ISO from a different mirror > > and reburnt > > another one; it's most certainly the install package. The > box itself > > runs 3.4 quite happily. Note that x330s use IBM's cable-chaining > > technology, which is great if you've got a tiny colo rack > > with a lot of > > servers in it like I do, since I don't have to have a KVM. > > > > So what changed in the install process? How can I get this > > resolved well > > enough to be able to use the CentOS 4 CDs? both the 3.4 and > > 4.0 install > > I realize that I could reaim my repository and upgrade to 4 > > via yum, but > > that's a pain if I'm having to bring a whole box back up from > > scratch... > > not to mention a nice hit to my bandwidth bill at my colo. > > > > Suggestions? Ideas? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > -Karl Katzke > > Karl, > I am not sure that it is the x330. We also have half a dozen > x330s and although I don't have centos 4 on all of them I am confident > that we have successfully installed centos 4 at least three times on > this server. We are also using the dvi like breakout cable, and it > attaches to an HP cat5 kvm. > > Graham > Karl, Sorry I lied, I have installed centos 4 on x335s not x330s. Graham

3 2

How do point releases work?
by Steve Snyder 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

I'm new to RHEL-like distros. When, say, CentOS 4.1 is released, will it simply be CentOS 4.0 + released updates in new ISO images? Or is it more than just the updated packages integrated into the full distribution? Put another way, if my 4.0 installation is kept up to date with YUM, will I basically have a 4.1 installation? Thanks.

4 3

How to record a data CD ?
by Mário Gamito 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

Hi, For years that i've been recording CDs and DVDs and all well. Now, i can't in CentOS-4 First i run: # mkisofs -r -J -o cd_backup cd/ Then # cdrecord -scanbus Output is: cdrecord: Warning: controller returns wrong size for CD capabilities page. 1,0,0 100) 'SAMSUNG ' 'CD-ROM SC-148F ' 'F008' Removable CD-ROM 1,1,0 101) 'HP ' 'CD-Writer+ 9500 ' '1.0e' Removable CD-ROM 1,2,0 102) * 1,3,0 103) * 1,4,0 104) * 1,5,0 105) * 1,6,0 106) * 1,7,0 107) * [root@tux gamito]# So, i used to record using: # cdrecord -v speed=16 dev=1,1,0 -data cd_backup But i get this error: "[root@tux gamito]# cdrecord -v speed=4 dev=1,1,0 -data cd_backup cdrecord: No write mode specified. cdrecord: Asuming -tao mode. cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent defaults. cdrecord: Continuing in 5 seconds... Cdrecord-Clone 2.01-dvd (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 JÃ¶rg Schilling Note: This version is an unofficial (modified) version with DVD support Note: and therefore may have bugs that are not present in the original. Note: Please send bug reports or support requests to http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla Note: The author of cdrecord should not be bothered with problems in this version. TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM scsidev: '1,1,0' scsibus: 1 target: 1 lun: 0 cdrecord: Success. Cannot open SCSI driver. cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'." Any ideas ? Thanks in advance Warm Regards, Mário Gamito

4 5

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 2, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:383 Critical CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 Firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 2. firefox 1.0.3 for CentOS-3/ia64 (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:22:18 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:383 Critical CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 Firefox - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <1114086138.3236.16.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:383 for i386 and x86_64 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-383.html refers The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos4.i386.rpm x86_64: firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos4.x86_64.rpm src: firefox-1.0.3-1.4.1.centos4.src.rpm Get with the command: yum update firefox Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

Centos EOL changes
by Michael Rock 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

Hi, has the end of life and yum update process changed for Centos? I want to stick with a release, but receive security updates to maintain stability on my critical servers. Last year I remember the plan being that if you picked 3.1, 3.3 or 3.4 you could stick with it and automatically receive yum updates without changing anything. Then when 3.4 came out the Centos readme said if you were on 3.3 you would automatically be updated to 3.4 through yum. That never happened and I remember reading some where here it would not. Which was fine by me since I assume that was due to sticking to the original plan. But now it seems I have a 3.3-1 server that all of sudden looks like it wants to update to 3.4. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

3 2

centos 4 apt repository
by Mark Quitoriano 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

any repository for centos 4?

2 4

Dovecot .99.11 build fails; libiconv
by Karl S. Katzke 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

Well, it seems this just isn't my day. Using the source RPM from a centos mirror, I tried to rebuild (and, after that fails) build manually a dovecot RPM. I get several errors about automake's iconv macro, AM_ICONV, missing, and then the install fails while looking for libiconv. I tested by first trying to rebuild the RPM, and when that failed, building the RPM manually by installing in sources and building, and when THAT failed, by unpacking the tarball and manually ./configure and make. Thanks to some googling around, I found that libiconv is a GNU package that's available in source, but that should generally be satisfied in glibc according to postings on the redhat mailing list. However... well, it seems that it isn't. Either that, or it's settled by a specific version of glibc, which I don't have in my glibc-2.3.4-2 ... and yes, I do have -common, -devel, -headers, -kernheaders, etc. installed for i686. I do have iconv.h on my system, but dovecot is specifically looking for libiconv. Anyone seen this before? Thanks, Karl Katzke

1 0

RE: [CentOS] X330 Keyboard/box dies on install 4.0, not on 3.4
by Graham Johnston 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karl S. Katzke > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 5:57 PM > To: centos(a)centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] X330 Keyboard/box dies on install 4.0, not on 3.4 > > I've got a handful of IBM X330's at my colo and another couple at the > office for testing purposes. Currently, they're running > CentOS 3.4 and > are very happy doing so. The 3.4 install was perfectly seamless. > > When I tried to upgrade one of my test machines to 4.0, the keyboard > died once I got into the install every single time once I boot to > anaconda from the CD. It dies as soon as the blue-background screen > appears, and it dies no matter which selection I choose at isolinux. > (I'm sure the system isn't locked because the keyboard is > dead while the > SCSI driver is loading, and the system keeps chugging along happily > until it needs input.) > The CD passes all of the tests I can apply to it, from > checksum to media > check, and has been used to install a half dozen machines > both before or > since. I also downloaded a new ISO from a different mirror > and reburnt > another one; it's most certainly the install package. The box itself > runs 3.4 quite happily. Note that x330s use IBM's cable-chaining > technology, which is great if you've got a tiny colo rack > with a lot of > servers in it like I do, since I don't have to have a KVM. > > So what changed in the install process? How can I get this > resolved well > enough to be able to use the CentOS 4 CDs? both the 3.4 and > 4.0 install > I realize that I could reaim my repository and upgrade to 4 > via yum, but > that's a pain if I'm having to bring a whole box back up from > scratch... > not to mention a nice hit to my bandwidth bill at my colo. > > Suggestions? Ideas? > > Thanks in advance, > -Karl Katzke Karl, I am not sure that it is the x330. We also have half a dozen x330s and although I don't have centos 4 on all of them I am confident that we have successfully installed centos 4 at least three times on this server. We are also using the dvi like breakout cable, and it attaches to an HP cat5 kvm. Graham

1 0

X330 Keyboard/box dies on install 4.0, not on 3.4
by Karl S. Katzke 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

I've got a handful of IBM X330's at my colo and another couple at the office for testing purposes. Currently, they're running CentOS 3.4 and are very happy doing so. The 3.4 install was perfectly seamless. When I tried to upgrade one of my test machines to 4.0, the keyboard died once I got into the install every single time once I boot to anaconda from the CD. It dies as soon as the blue-background screen appears, and it dies no matter which selection I choose at isolinux. (I'm sure the system isn't locked because the keyboard is dead while the SCSI driver is loading, and the system keeps chugging along happily until it needs input.) The CD passes all of the tests I can apply to it, from checksum to media check, and has been used to install a half dozen machines both before or since. I also downloaded a new ISO from a different mirror and reburnt another one; it's most certainly the install package. The box itself runs 3.4 quite happily. Note that x330s use IBM's cable-chaining technology, which is great if you've got a tiny colo rack with a lot of servers in it like I do, since I don't have to have a KVM. So what changed in the install process? How can I get this resolved well enough to be able to use the CentOS 4 CDs? both the 3.4 and 4.0 install I realize that I could reaim my repository and upgrade to 4 via yum, but that's a pain if I'm having to bring a whole box back up from scratch... not to mention a nice hit to my bandwidth bill at my colo. Suggestions? Ideas? Thanks in advance, -Karl Katzke

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Centos EOL changes
by Michael Rock 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

I went ahead with the yum update, now 'rpm -q centos-release' shows: centos-release-3.3-1 centos-release-3-4.2 I had walked away from a vnc session as it was yum updating and came back to a closed vnc sessions. So I thought maybe it did not finish. However a server reboot and a subsequent 'yum clean' and 'yum update' did not yield any new additions. So it looks like it got everything but not sure if it should show both versions in 'rpm -q centos-release'? thx again -- Mike --- Matt Hyclak <hyclak(a)math.ohiou.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:14:07PM -0700, Michael > Rock enlightened us: > > I was getting security updates from yum centos > > mirrors regularly on the 3.3-1 servers and checked > the > > Centos errata. So I assumed the default unchanged > > centos yum.conf was giving me everything I needed. > Now > > it seems yum will jump me from 3.3-1 to 3.4. > > > > Does this all sound about right? > > > > (I figured after seeing this I must be doing > something > > wrong or the process changed somewhere. I do not > > remember seeing an announcement other than the one > > back in January but later someone mentioned the > > automatic update to 3.4 would not happen). > > > > If my memory serves me, there was a problem with > bind breaking during an > upgrade from 3.3 to 3.4, so until the problem was > fixed (within the last > week or two), both the 3.3 and 3.4 trees were > maintained separately. Now > that the problem has been resolved, the maintainers > have combined it all > back into a single tree. > > Matt > > -- > Matt Hyclak > Department of Mathematics > Department of Social Work > Ohio University > (740) 593-1263 > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

RE: [CentOS] Apache, MySQL, and PHP
by Mark A. Lewis 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Olaf Greve > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 3:17 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache, MySQL, and PHP > > Hi, > > I have set up this combination on various platforms, > including Windows, FreeBSD, RHEL and CentOS and I must say > that by far the easiest was CentOS. Now, how is this any different than what you would do on RHEL? Seeing as Cent is based on it, it would be identical. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

6 6

Re: [CentOS] Centos EOL changes
by Michael Rock 22 Apr '05

22 Apr '05

Hi, I was getting security updates from yum centos mirrors regularly on the 3.3-1 servers and checked the Centos errata. So I assumed the default unchanged centos yum.conf was giving me everything I needed. Now it seems yum will jump me from 3.3-1 to 3.4. Does this all sound about right? (I figured after seeing this I must be doing something wrong or the process changed somewhere. I do not remember seeing an announcement other than the one back in January but later someone mentioned the automatic update to 3.4 would not happen). Thx -- Mike --- Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists(a)hughesjr.com> wrote: > Centos-3 is the distro > > When RHEL puts out a quarterly update (ie update 4) > we call it version > 3.4. > > So 3.3 will go to 3.4 and to 3.5 and so on. > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

Module loading order during install
by Joshua Baker-LePain 21 Apr '05

21 Apr '05

Is there a way in a kickstart install to affect the order in which modules get loaded? I want to load 3w-xxxx before 3w-9xxx so that my OS mirror drives take their proper place as sda and sdb, but centos-4 wants to load 3x-9xxx first, making my (unbootable) big arrays the first two drives. In this configuration, it seems that even trying to install grub to /dev/sdc fails. Ideas? Thanks. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University

5 6

RE: [CentOS] 1 GB RAM CentOS 4 only sees 885 MB
by Bryan J. Smith 21 Apr '05

21 Apr '05

Research the 1/3GB (32-bit) v. 4/4GB (PAE36) addressing models for Intel PAE36. If the kernel is the former, you'll run into the limit you have. If the kernel is the latter, you won't, but you'll take a paging hit as PAE36 swaps in/out 512MB pages from above 4GB (yes, I know, you only have 1GB but it's complicated to explain :-). BTW, *all* Athlons, both 32-bit and 64-bit, are actually 40-bit EV6 (Alpha 264), and not 32-bit/PAE36 addressing. But the Athlon uses 32-bit/PAE36 paging for compatibility. If you have a mainboard with a BIOS that has a "Linux" option for memory/IO addressing (very rare), there is a way to use the Linux kernel to get a "flat" 64GB model, as well as get the 32-bit Athlon's AGPgart (which is in the CPU, not the chipset - at least on the MP) to act like an I/O MMU for "safe" >4GB I/O transfers. Not even Intel's EM64T offers that BTW, I have *never* done this personally with a 32-bit Athlon. I only read about the kernel hack and the few mainboard BIOSes that support it (which prevents Windows from booting when set). Understand the 32-bit and 64-bit AMD processors are the same core design (even 48-bit/PAE52, although much is not enabled/useful on the 32-bit), including the *physical* 40-bit/1TB addressing of EV6. Intel is still using 32-bit/4GB GTL+ *physically* on even their latest EM64T processors, which is a major performance issue. -----Original Message----- From: ryan Date: 4/20/05 8:27 pm To: CentOS mailing list Subj: [CentOS] 1 GB RAM CentOS 4 only sees 885 MB Is this a known bug? Suprisingly google didn't turn up much. I'm running DDR RAM and a AMD XP processor on CentOS 4. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

Accessing shell in CentOS 4 install
by Brendon Colby 21 Apr '05

21 Apr '05

Greetings, I'm having trouble accessing a shell when I boot into the installation of CentOS 4 (text mode). Alt-2 (which is where the shell should be started?) shows nothing (nothing any other console). How do I access the shell within the installation? Thanks. Brendon Colby

3 3

NX (execshield)
by tobaccofarm 21 Apr '05

21 Apr '05

I heard something about execshield in some thread on OSnews.com. Does CentOS4 have an execshield compiled kernel? kind regards, Peter

4 3

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 2, Issue 10
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 21 Apr '05

21 Apr '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:332 Low CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 xloadimage - security update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2005:366 Important CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 kernel - security update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2005:392 Critical CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 HelixPlayer - security update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2005:383 Important CentOS 4 ia64 firefox - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:34:08 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:332 Low CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 xloadimage - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <1114007648.5594.35.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:332 for i386 and x86_64 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-332.html refers: The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: xloadimage-4.1-34.RHEL4.i386.rpm x86_64: xloadimage-4.1-34.RHEL4.x86_64.rpm src: xloadimage-4.1-34.RHEL4.src.rpm install with this command: yum update xloadimage Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

kbd remove error
by Mark Quitoriano 21 Apr '05

21 Apr '05

hi guys i just partially upgrade centos 3.4 to centos 4(using apt-get) and im having a problem removing kdb 1.08-10.2, kbd 1.12-2 is already installed and im trying to remove kdb 1.08 through apt-get and rpm -e here's what happened when i use apt-get: # apt-get remove kbd#1.08-10.2 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: kbd#1.08-10.2 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 removed and 20 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 2018kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y Committing changes... Preparing... ########################################### [100%] error reading information on service keytable: No such file or directory error: %trigger(kbd-1.08-10.2) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 W: Some errors occurred while running transaction here's what happened when i use rpm: # rpm -e kbd-1.08-10.2 error reading information on service keytable: No such file or directory error: %trigger(kbd-1.08-10.2) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 -- Regards, Mark Quitoriano, CCNA

5 7

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss