- Discuss - lists.centos.org

interesting piece about RHEL 4
by William Warren 19 Jan '05

19 Jan '05

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/18/redhat_four/ -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician) Linux user #322099 Machines: 206822 256638 276825 http://counter.li.org/ (i figured just for giggles why not?)

1 0

I'm gonna kill Yum AND Outlook
by Alejandro Reyero 19 Jan '05

19 Jan '05

Here we go again: Hi all. Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computers problems ;-) ), since weve been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post here, so lets see, I have my faith on you I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 . Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I try to do a yum update: yum update Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: CentOS-Null - Addons Server: CentOS-Null - Base Server: CentOS-Null - Extras Server: CentOS-Null - Updates Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies ....Dependencies resolved I will do the following: [update: redhat-config-keyboard 1.1.4-1.noarch] [update: XFree86-xfs 4.3.0-78.EL.i386] [update: modutils 2.4.25-14.EL.i386] I will install/upgrade these to satisfy the dependencies: [deps: util-linux 2.11y-31.2.i386] [deps: libacl 2.2.3-1.i386] [deps: initscripts 7.31.18.EL-1.centos.0.i386] [deps: libtermcap 2.0.8-35.i386] [deps: libgcc 3.2.3-49.i386] [deps: cracklib 2.7-22.i386] [deps: termcap 11.0.1-17.1.noarch] [deps: gpm 1.19.3-27.2.i386] [deps: mingetty 1.06-1.i386] [deps: procps 2.0.17-13.i386] [deps: XFree86-libs-data 4.3.0-78.EL.i386] [deps: sed 4.0.7-3.i386] [deps: iproute 2.4.7-11.30E.1.i386] [deps: e2fsprogs 1.32-15.1.i386] [deps: grep 2.5.1-24.1.i386] [deps: words 2-21.noarch] [deps: sysklogd 1.4.1-12.3.i386] [deps: ethtool 1.8-3.3.i386] [deps: glib2 2.2.3-2.0.i386] [deps: chkconfig 1.3.11-0.3.i386] [deps: psmisc 21.3-1.RHEL.0.i386] [deps: findutils 1:4.1.7-9.i386] [deps: pam 0.75-62.i386] [deps: SysVinit 2.85-4.2.i386] [deps: rhpl 0.110.6-1.centos.0.i386] [deps: popt 1.8.2-10.i386] [deps: iputils 20020927-11.30.1.i386] [deps: net-tools 1.60-20E.1.i386] [deps: db4 4.1.25-8.i386] [deps: dev 3.3.12.3-1.centos.0.i386] [deps: zlib 1.1.4-8.1.i386] [deps: coreutils 4.5.3-26.i386] [deps: pyxf86config 0.3.5-1.i386] [deps: mktemp 1.5-18.i386] [deps: fontconfig 2.2.1-13.i386] [deps: shadow-utils 2:4.0.3-22.02.i386] [deps: setup 2.5.27-1.noarch] [deps: XFree86-Mesa-libGL 4.3.0-78.EL.i386] [deps: info 4.5-3.i386] [deps: ncurses 5.3-9.3.i386] [deps: glib 1:1.2.10-11.1.i386] [deps: libattr 2.2.0-1.i386] [deps: XFree86-libs 4.3.0-78.EL.i386] [deps: pcre 3.9-10.1.i386] [deps: cracklib-dicts 2.7-22.i386] [deps: expat 1.95.5-6.i386] [deps: bash 2.05b-29.0.3.centos.0.i386] [deps: XFree86-font-utils 4.3.0-78.EL.i386] [deps: freetype 2.1.4-4.0.i386] [deps: ttmkfdir 3.0.9-6.i386] Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 025e513b Error: Could not find the GPG Key necessary to validate pkg /var/cache/yum/addons/packages/util-linux-2.11y-31.2.i386.rpm Error: You may want to run yum clean or remove the file: /var/cache/yum/addons/packages/util-linux-2.11y-31.2.i386.rpm Error: You may also check that you have the correct GPG keys installed Do you notice the CentOS-Null ??? Well, the funny thing is that /etc/redhat-release exists and has this: # more /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 3.4 (final) So I though, ok, upgrade incompleted: # yum install centos-release Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: CentOS-Null - Addons Server: CentOS-Null - Base Server: CentOS-Null - Extras Server: CentOS-Null - Updates Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies ...Dependencies resolved I will do the following: [install: centos-release 2:3-4.2.i386] I will install/upgrade these to satisfy the dependencies: [deps: libtermcap 2.0.8-35.i386] [deps: termcap 11.0.1-17.1.noarch] [deps: mktemp 1.5-18.i386] [deps: bash 2.05b-29.0.3.centos.0.i386] Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 025e513b Error: Could not find the GPG Key necessary to validate pkg /var/cache/yum/addons/packages/libtermcap-2.0.8-35.i386.rpm Error: You may want to run yum clean or remove the file: /var/cache/yum/addons/packages/libtermcap-2.0.8-35.i386.rpm Error: You may also check that you have the correct GPG keys installed I've added the keys 45234524 times: # gpg --list-public-keys /root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg ------------------------ pub 1024D/025E513B 2004-03-15 CentOS-3 Key <centos-3key(a)caosity.org> sub 2048g/EE899A92 2004-03-15 [expires: 2009-03-14] I've also deleted the keys, deleted /var/cache/yum ... I don't know what else to do My yum.conf: [main] exclude=httpd* mysql* php* perl* mod_* mod_ssl* spamassassin* cachedir=/var/cache/yum debuglevel=2 logfile=/var/log/yum.log pkgpolicy=newest distroverpkg=redhat-release installonlypkgs=kernel kernel-smp kernel-hugemem kernel-enterprise kernel-debug kernel-unsupported kernel-smp-unsupported kernel-hugemem- unsupported tolerant=1 exactarch=1 [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base baseurl=http://acmserver.cs.ucr.edu/centos/centos/3.4/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 #released updates [update] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates baseurl=http://acmserver.cs.ucr.edu/centos/centos/3.4/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 #packages used/produced in the build but not released [addons] name=CentOS-$releasever - Addons baseurl=http://acmserver.cs.ucr.edu/centos/centos/3.4/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 #additional packages that may be useful [extras] name=CentOS-$releasever - Extras baseurl=http://acmserver.cs.ucr.edu/centos/centos/3.4/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 Ive also imported the Keys from HD ( the gpg import + rpm import thing ). Right now I've disabled GPG check, but it's not a great solution, you know... Thanks in advance and sorry for this BIG bandwidth-waster post. Alejandro.

2 1

SuperServer 6024H-82R and Centos 3.3
by Joe Polk 18 Jan '05

18 Jan '05

I know this is a long shot, but does anyone have any familiarity with this server? It uses the Super X6DH8-G2 motherboard. Currently, we've added an Adaptec 2120S Ultra320 RAID PCI Controller Card to get RAID 5 capability. The installation bombs and from what I can tell it looks like we're getting SCSI resets or the controller is going offline maybe. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. -- <<JAV>>

7 14

Re: [Centos] rpm db
by cweisiger＠i-55.com 18 Jan '05

18 Jan '05

i believe a server re-install is required....ive done that before, what you did and i had to re-install....yet there might be a way to salvage it but im not exactly sure the proper way

4 3

Re: [Centos] rpm db
by cweisiger＠i-55.com 18 Jan '05

18 Jan '05

i believe when i did it...i didnt get such warning message...but oh well no big deal...ive learned my lesson....

1 0

rpm db
by JCT 18 Jan '05

18 Jan '05

Hi All, I wonder if someone can help. My rpm db was corrupted. So I ran rm -f __db* followed rpm rebuild db which ran OK. But I keep getting the following error. error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm warning: kernel-source-2.4.21-20.0.1.EL.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 025e513b error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm -- Regards JC

4 7

CentOS-4.0 (Beta) for i386 Official Release
by Johnny Hughes 18 Jan '05

18 Jan '05

The CentOS team is happy to announce the availability of CentOS-4.0 (Beta) for i386. This product supports AMD Athlon, Athlon XP, Duron, and Intel Pentium, Pentium Pro, Pentium II, Pentium III, Pentium 4 and Pentium Xeon processors. A bittorent for individual CD binary iso files is available from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/i386/CentOS-4.0-Beta-i386-discs1… The source RPMS are available via bittorrent from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/i386/CentOS-4.0-Beta-i386-src6-9… If possible, please use bittorrent to download all files and please leave your download client running after the download is complete (with ports 6881-6889 open) as your client will become part of the peer to peer bittorrent network and reduce the load on our network mirrors. If you need some quick pointers for getting up to speed on bittorrent read: http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=24 If you can't use bittorrent (please try), ISOs are available here: Binary and Source CDs: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/i386/ --------------------- NOTE: This is a Beta distribution and may not be suitable for use in production environments. Please add any errors or bugs you encounter to bugzilla on http://www.centos.org/bugs --------------------- You must change your "/etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources" and your "/etc/yum.conf" files to point to the beta server. For examples of each of these files see: http://centos.HughesJR.com/build/ --------------------- To stay current with CentOS: Join the CentOS mailing list at: http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Join various team members on IRC at irc.freenode.net #centos Visit our new website at http://www.centos.org Enjoy, The CentOS Team

3 2

CentOS-4.0 (Beta) for x86_64 Official Release
by Johnny Hughes 18 Jan '05

18 Jan '05

The CentOS team is happy to announce the availability of CentOS-4.0 (Beta) for x86_64. This product supports AMD64 and Intel EM64T processors. A bittorent for individual CD binary iso files is available from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/x86_64/CentOS-4.0-x86_64-beta-bi… A bittorrent for the DVD binary iso images is available from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/x86_64/CentOS-4.0-x86_64-beta-bi… The source RPMS are the same as the i386 version of CentOS-4.0 (Beta), and are available via bittorrent from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/i386/CentOS-4.0-Beta-i386-src6-9… If possible, please use bittorrent to download all files and please leave your download client running after the download is complete (with ports 6881-6889 open) as your client will become part of the peer to peer bittorrent network and reduce the load on our network mirrors. If you need some quick pointers for getting up to speed on bittorrent read: http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=24 If you can't use bittorrent (please try), ISOs are available here: Binary CDs: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/x86_64/ Source CDs: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/i386/ --------------------- NOTE: This is a Beta distribution and may not be suitable for use in production environments. Please add any errors or bugs you encounter to bugzilla on http://www.centos.org/bugs --------------------- You must change your "/etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources" and your "/etc/yum.conf" files to point to the beta server. For examples of each of these files see: http://centos.HughesJR.com/build/ There is also a known bug with openoffice.org, the library compat- libstdc++-33-3.2.3-46.1.i386.rpm was not included on the ISO. After doing the installation, and after changing your yum.conf (or up2date sources) file as detailed above, issue one of these commands to get the library: yum install compat-libstdc++-33.i386 or up2date compat-libstdc++-33.i386 --------------------- To stay current with CentOS: Join the CentOS mailing list at: http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Join various team members on IRC at irc.freenode.net #centos Visit our new website at http://www.centos.org Enjoy, The CentOS Team

1 0

RHEL 4 => CentOS 4
by Michiel van Es 18 Jan '05

18 Jan '05

Hi, I would like to try to switch from CentOS 3.4 => CentOS 4 beta. I hava a couple of questions: -is possible to upadte/upgrade my test box from 3.4 => 4 and what are the yum.conf settings/requirements? -is it easy to update your CentOS 4 beta => CentOS 4 when the stable version comes out? Thanks in advance! -- Kind Regards, Michiel van Es

7 15

Mod_Throttle for Apache 2?
by Matt Shields 17 Jan '05

17 Jan '05

We have some custom software that is put out on our 6 clustered(balanced) webservers. Every 5 minutes that software checks into our server for a new version, if there is a new version it downloads it (20MB file). This happens about 2-3 times per month. Currently there are over 10000 clients that need to download the update. Up until this past week we were able to handle the load and this is putting a serious strain on our webservers. We were hoping to throttle the amount of traffic that each of the webservers would take and the bandwidth that each client consumes. Previously I've used Mod_Throttle for Apache 1.3 on other projects, but on our new servers they are running Apache 2. So are there any similar solutions for Apache 2? -- Matt Shields http://masnetworks.biz http://shieldsmedia.com (currently under construction) http://shieldsproductions.com (currently under construction)

3 4

bind and 3.4
by Francois Caen 17 Jan '05

17 Jan '05

Hello, I encountered a problem when upgrading from 3.3 to 3.4 on i386. The machine is a production name server running bind. Looks like the new rpm moved my named.conf to .rpmsave and chkconfig'ed bind to off. That's really bad. A more gentle behavior would have been to save the new named.conf to .rpmnew and not mess with initscripts. Anyone else notice that? Francois Caen

12 29

Postfix 2.1 RPM?
by Support Ev.-Theol. Fak. Uni Bonn 16 Jan '05

16 Jan '05

hi all, i`m looking for an postfix 2.1 rpm for CentOS 3 with TSL support. i tried the rpm form: http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.1/RPMS-rhel3-i386/postfix-2.1.5-4.rhel3.i386.… but it doesn`t support tsl.

3 2

Guide to stripping Centos 3
by R P Herrold 16 Jan '05

16 Jan '05

I responded to a post in the Dell poweredge mailing list earlier today. My answer was off the top of my head, with a bit of experimentation. The content may be useful in the Cenyos context as well to admin's looking to strip the size of an install to the bare bones. Comment welcomed. Can anyone see any packages which I have missed? -- Russ Herrold ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:29:12 -0500 (EST) From: R P Herrold <herrold(a)owlriver.com> To: linux-poweredge(a)dell.com Subject: Re: dell-lnx-pe] Re: Stripping RHEL 3.0? > At 07:58 PM 1/14/2005 -0500, David Hubbard wrote: >> Does anyone know of a good guide for stripping >> down RHEL 3.0? <snip> >> Due to all the dependencies >> I can't find a way to actually strip RHEL in a way >> that leaves everything happy. Great timing and a good question -- I was just building such a host. I'll test for a bit to minimize size. Kickstart and anaconda are your friends. Here is a quick guide: During each install, a file called 'ks.cfg' is left by anaconda in /root/ At the end of this post, I include the ks.cfg file which will build a stripped host. I have done a couple test installs, and gone through the resulting packagelist using; rpm -qa --qf '%{size} %{name} \n' | sort -n | less to see what I could add with the '-' prefix at the bottom of the file. (I have left in there a couple 'conveneince packages' and I usually add one extravagance -- I prefer 'konsole' to pop back as a remote terminal and so pay its space penalty, but comment it out here) As I said, I 'went hunting' and trimmed it down to 465 M ; more savings are possible. The worst remaining mandatory 'size offenders' in the install are: glibc-common 42M perl 27M kernel 22M Not much more we can do there. But ... Once the install is done, turn off auditting: chkconfig audit off service audit stop and reclaim the LARGE (100M) amout of room these files eat up cd /var/log/audit.d/ rm -f * Unfortunately the package is not deletable as there are dependency issues. As I say. I then end up at: 465M Using a network install from a local mirror and a ks.cf file permits 'gameing' to see what changed in the ks.cfg result in a given size profile. See my notes at: http://www.owlriver.com/tips/pxe-install/ for more information on setting up and debugging such an environment. It permits experimentation with fast test installs (under ten minutes per test shot, even on a low RAM host (64M)) to 'tune' for a desired result. -- Russ Herrold [root@ftp kickstart]# cat ks.cfg-Centos_34 # # Centos 34 server - built to be tiny as possible # install lang en_US.UTF-8 langsupport --default en_US.UTF-8 en_US.UTF-8 keyboard us mouse genericwheelps/2 --device psaux url --url ftp://10.16.33.105/pub/install/ftpinstall # xconfig --card "RIVA128" --videoram 4096 --hsync 31.5-35.1 --vsync 50-61 --resolution 1280x800 --depth 24 skipx network --device eth0 --bootproto dhcp # rootpw --iscrypted <elided> firewall --disabled # not yet in RHEL 3 # selinux --disabled authconfig --enableshadow --enablemd5 timezone America/New_York bootloader --location=mbr # --append hdb=ide-scsi # The following is the partition information you requested # Note that any partitions you deleted are not expressed # here so unless you clear all partitions first, this is # not guaranteed to work clearpart --all --drives=hda part /boot --fstype ext3 --size=100 --ondisk=hda part / --fstype ext3 --size=1024 --grow --ondisk=hda part /var/spool --fstype ext3 --size=1024 --grow --ondisk=hda part /var/cache --fstype ext3 --size=1024 --grow --ondisk=hda part /var/log --fstype ext3 --size=1024 --grow --ondisk=hda part swap --size=128 --grow --maxsize=256 --ondisk=hda # basically a unconfigured server - the new 2005 Centurion %packages kernel elinks grub joe lftp lynx rdate rpm-build rsync yum # kdebase -apmd -autofs -centos-yumcache -comps -cups -cups-libs -eal3-certification -eal3-certification-doc -finger -freetype -ipsec-tools -iptables -iptables-ipv6 -irda-utils -iscsi-initiator-utils -isdn4k-utils -krb5-libs -krb5-workstation -krbafs-utils -kernel-pcmcia-cs -libwvstreams -mdadm -mgetty -mtr -nano -nfs-utils -pam_krb5 -pam_smb -parted -portmap -raidtools -redhat-config-network-tui -redhat-config-securitylevel-tui -redhat-logos -redhat-menues -redhat-lsb -rpmdb-redhat -stunnel -sysreport -talk -tftp -specspo -vconfig -wireless-tools -wvdial -xinetd -ypbind -yp-tools # If you use yum, you do not need: -up2date -up2date-update %post [root@ftp kickstart]#

2 1

Re: UPDATED: resolved caching-nameserver network install failure
by donavan nelson 16 Jan '05

16 Jan '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 |>>Since people have both updates and os in their yum.conf files, how are |>>they _NOT_ going to get the update. |> |>I didn't think 7.3 was accessible unless you enabled the testing |>repository. I'll verify and hit lance if that's NOT the case as it |>would invalidate what I've just said. |> This was intended to imply via a yum command. |> |>>It seems to me they will still get the newer version via yum and |>>dependency resolution regardless of where in the directory structure it |>>is. |> |>If 7.3 is infact in updates, they are getting it. |> | | No ... if it is in centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ they are getting | it ... this is such a mess....but for everyone who may have this question. caching-nameserver-7.2 and caching-name-server-7.3 both exist in the centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS (new installs and network installs will get 7.3 due to the package list). System doing upgrades will only see 7.2 because 7.2 is the only package populated in centos/3.4/os/i386/headers/ . | yum.conf has an entry like this: | | [base] | name=CentOS-$releasever - Base | baseurl=mirror.../centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ | | SO ... any RPM in centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ is going to also be in | package resolution...since 7.3 is in centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ and | since 7.2 is in updates, 7.3 will be installed. | See about regarding the location of both packages. Also yum only uses the headers it finds (as a result of using yum-arch). It doesn't NOT examine the actual files in the directory. .dn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB6Y4wCRFXD+VcGBkRAp6VAJ9YGUZF39lZtXESwF3Dps7IgKFlqACfYJZl hI4hZSUangOBEkNZ1Yr+BB0= =MTdH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Loosing keyboard
by dan1 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

Hello. I am experiencing a problem with CentOS 3, it's that when I start Xwindow, my keyboard is lost and I can't do anything anymore. The Num Lock doesn't react nor the Caps lock. It's like if it would just be disabled. If I quit Xwindow, then my keyboard comes back again, working perfectly. Did anybody also have this problem ? I had a look elsewhere but didn't see anything helpful. My XF86Config file has a normal input section and I tried to change it without success. The current one: Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" EndSection Of course I also changed the physical keyboard. Thanks for any pointers, Daniel No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date: 12.01.2005

3 3

rpmbuild --rebuild --define 'buildklips 1' openswan-2.3.0-1rhel.src.rpm quirk
by Ted Kaczmarek 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

rpmbuild --rebuild --define 'buildklips 1' openswan-2.3.0-1rhel.src.rpm The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-27.0.1.EL' make: *** [module26] Error 2 make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/openswan-2.3.0' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.43563 (%build) # Loadable module support # CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y CONFIG_KMOD=y I am tad perplexed here, any ideas? Regards, Ted

1 0

Centos 3.4 x86_64 beta
by Michael Rock 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

Is the beta 3.4 x86_64 almost ready for production release? I need to setup an Athlon 64, is the beta 3.4 stable enough or should I download the 3.3 64 bit ISOs? thx -- Mike __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

postfix with tls?
by support＠ev-theol.uni-bonn.de 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

hi all, i tried to install postgrey for postfix and had to update postfix to version 2.1. i added the following to /etc/yum.conf [postfix-2.1-rhel3] name=Postfix Mail Server for RedHat Enterprise Linux 3.0 - $basearch baseurl=http://ftp.WL0.org/yum/postfix/2.1/rhel3/ after the update i have problems because the new version of postfix doesn´t support SASL. is there an postfix-tls rpm for CentOS 3? If not how can i remove postfix 2.1 and install the old version with TLS support? thank you very much for your help

2 1

Centos-3 x86_64 Updates (libtiff, mozilla)
by Tru Huynh 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

New Security Errata for Centos-3 x86_64 Systems: This affects all releases of Centos-3: libtiff: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-019.html RPMS/libtiff-3.5.7-22.el3.i386.rpm RPMS/libtiff-3.5.7-22.el3.x86_64.rpm RPMS/libtiff-devel-3.5.7-22.el3.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/libtiff-3.5.7-22.el3.src.rpm mozilla: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-038.html RPMS/mozilla-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-chat-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-devel-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-dom-inspector-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-js-debugger-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-mail-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nspr-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nspr-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nspr-devel-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nss-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nss-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nss-devel-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/mozilla-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.src.rpm To Apply these updates run: yum update Thanks Tru Huynh -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

Postfix with TLS
by support＠ev-theol.uni-bonn.de 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

hi all, i tried to install postgrey for postfix and had to update postfix to version 2.1. i added the following to /etc/yum.conf [postfix-2.1-rhel3] name=Postfix Mail Server for RedHat Enterprise Linux 3.0 - $basearch baseurl=http://ftp.WL0.org/yum/postfix/2.1/rhel3/ after the update i have problems because the new version of postfix doesn´t support SASL. is there an postfix-tls rpm for CentOS 3? If not how can i remove postfix 2.1 and install the old version with TLS support? thank you very much for your help

1 0

Centos-3 x86 Updates
by seth vidal 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

New Security Errata for Centos-3 x86 Systems: This affects all releases of Centos-3: libtiff: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-019.html RPMS/libtiff-3.5.7-22.el3.i386.rpm RPMS/libtiff-devel-3.5.7-22.el3.i386.rpm SRPMS/libtiff-3.5.7-22.el3.src.rpm mozilla: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-038.html RPMS/mozilla-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-chat-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-devel-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-dom-inspector-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-js-debugger-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-mail-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nspr-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nspr-devel-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nss-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm RPMS/mozilla-nss-devel-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.i386.rpm SRPMS/mozilla-1.4.3-3.0.7.centos.1.src.rpm To Apply these updates run: yum update Thanks -sv

1 0

PHP+Oracle problem
by Mezei Zoltan 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

Hi! I have succesfully installed Oracle 9.2.0.4 on Centos. Everything is fine with it. Then I recompiled php-4.3.2-19.ent.src.rpm with rpmbuild --rebuild --define 'oracle 1' php-4.3.2-19.ent.src.rpm The compilation was successful, and I got the php and the php-oci8 rpms. Then I installed them both. After this one running the following PHP script: <?php $c = ocilogon("wonttell", "wonttell", "WONTTELL"); ocilogoff($c); ?> by issuing the command: php < oracle_test.php executed with segfault. The strace output is available at: http://www.telefor1.hu:7000/segfault.txt Strance, but when invoked the script from the web it runs flawlessly. Can anybody point to a solution that solves this problem? -- Zizi

3 4

CentOS4 + Subversion?
by Troy Engel 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

Hey all - does RHES4/CentOS4 beta contain a recent integration of Subversion? I've been holding off trying to retro-fit CentOS 3.x on our CVS server, hoping that the official channels aready had it in store for the future. Not that you *can't* retrofit, I was just uncomfortable upgrading so many stock packages. Anyone have it installed, can take a look for me? thx, -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

4 4

caching-nameserver network install failure
by donavan nelson 15 Jan '05

15 Jan '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Due to the removal of caching-nameserver-7.3-3_EL3.noarch.rpm from the 3.4 i386, network installs (using boot.iso from within the os tree) will fail if the caching-nameserver package is included at package selection time. If you wish to use network installs and want to install caching-nameserver, first perform a network install excluding the caching-nameserver. Then install caching name server via with yum. yum install caching-nameserver bugzilla can be used to track this issue if you so desire. https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Thanks, .dn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB513N91riaJJiujcRAihOAKCCczTrZylds9rtdPXdgsB1+4Q0DQCgtNKZ IttZOZK8je4FwQQeE5lfcs4= =GXe3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 14 Jan '05

14 Jan '05

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:038-01 Updated mozilla packages fix a buffer overflow Files available: mozilla-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-chat-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-devel-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-dom-inspector-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-js-debugger-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-mail-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-nspr-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-nspr-devel-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-nss-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm mozilla-nss-devel-1.4.3-2.1.5.c2.1.i386.rpm Notes: mozilla has been modified to remove redhat default bookmarks and fix bug #120019 More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 14 Jan '05

14 Jan '05

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:019-01 Updated libtiff packages fix security issues Files available: libtiff-3.5.5-19.i386.rpm libtiff-devel-3.5.5-19.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

missing rpm?
by data zone 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

is there a reason why mysql-server is not in the base?

4 4

Problem with SCSI controllers: Anaconda (and kernel option for grub/lilo)
by Ralph Angenendt 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Hi, I do seem to have a slight problem with upgrading two of our machines to CentOS (from SuSE, but that doesn't really matter). Both systems are IBM x-Series 360 with a ServeRaid controller for the "internal" hard disks an a QLogic QLA2200 fibre channel controller for an external stack of disks. On SuSE (kernel 2.4.26) the ServeRaid is controller 0 (resulting in the internal Raid Array being /dev/sda) and the QLogic controller is controller 1 (with the external disks being /dev/sdb). With CentOS (yes, I did an unattended kickstart install) the QLogic is recognized as the first controller, the ServeRaid as the second, so CentOS is installed on the external disks (which kills the database residing there). Is there any possibility (be it software or hardware if anyone knows the x360) to tell CentOS, that the ServeRaid controller has to be recognized as the first controller and the QLogic as the second? This goes for installation *and* operation later on, by way of a kernel command line or whatever. Thanks in advance, Ralph Angenendt -- Ralph Angenendt......ra(a)br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...HA-Multimedia | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Rundfunkplatz 1........80300 München | .which cannot be justified on any other Tl:089.5900.16023..Fx:089.5900.16240 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC

3 3

bad keytable
by security 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Hello, I try to install Centos 3 U4, to test if the bug is present as under Gralinux AS 3 (an other clone of Redhat AS 3) and yes ... this bug is there. When I try to install the Centos3U4, I choose French keyboard (azerty) , French language: no problem. But after, when want to enter the root passord, or edit the name of a partition with diskdruid the keyboard is still in US qwerty. Does anyone have this issue ??? jean-seb -- jean-sébastien Hubert Service Informatique Air-Austral 0262 93 10 34 interne: 182 http://www.air-austral.com

1 0

Problem during install of 3.4
by Jim 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

I am having a problem during install of centos 3.4 I am getting an error which says: "The partition table on device /dev/sdb is of unexpected type loop for your architecture. Do you want to reinitialize the drive?" Searching google i found: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90635 Which was from a while ago and its currently in closed status with no resolution provided?? Does anyone have any more info about this? I currently have FC3 installed on this machine and /dev/sdb is indeed working just fine. sdb is a sata drive connected to a promise controller on my motherboard. sda is also connected to this controller and it gets detected just fine. Any ideas? Thanks. -Jim

6 6

Centos-3 i386 errata - Updated xpdf and cups packages
by seth vidal 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

A new xpdf package is available for CentOS-3 . Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-018.html. RPMS/xpdf-2.02-9.4.i386.rpm SRPMS/xpdf-2.02-9.4.src.rpm Execute "yum update xpdf" to apply. New CUPS packages are available for CentOS-3 i386. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-013.html. RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.22.i386.rpm RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.22.i386.rpm RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.22.i386.rpm SRPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.22.src.rpm Execute "yum update cups" to apply. Thanks, -sv

1 0

Modprobe errors during startup on CentOS 3.4
by WipeOut 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Hi, I am getting loads of modprobe errors flying past on the screen during startup.. I never got these errors on any of the PC I installed 3.3 onto but now I have tried 3.4 on two seperate PC's and got these errors.. Anyoen else having this? Later..

3 6

Removal of CentOS 3.1 from mirrors
by Lance Davis 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

With the release of CentOS 3.4 the decision has been taken to remove CentOS 3.1 from the mirrors. This will save approximately 18 GB of space and make room for new architectures and CentOS 4.0 . CentOS 3.1 was superceded by CentOS 3.3 in September, and at that time a new centos-release rpm was pushed into the 3.1 tree to update users to 3.3 . The only people that wont be updated are those that may have hardcoded 3.1 into their yum.conf and for them we have been pushing updates back into the 3.1 tree. Now 3.1 is a symlink to 3.3 so that even if they have hardcoded yum.conf (dont !!) they will now get the 3.3 tree, which will make little difference as the updates were all in the 3.1 tree anyway. 3.1 was only released for i386. Lance

1 0

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated CUPS packages fix security issues
by Will Dinkel 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

New CUPS packages are available for CentOS-3 3.3 x86_64. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-013.html. RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.22.x86_64.rpm RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.22.x86_64.rpm RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.22.i386.rpm RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.22.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.22.src.rpm Execute "yum update cups" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Technology Officer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated Xpdf packages fix security issues
by Will Dinkel 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

A new xpdf package is available for CentOS-3 3.3. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-018.html. RPMS/xpdf-2.02-9.4.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/xpdf-2.02-9.4.src.rpm Execute "yum update xpdf" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Technology Officer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:015-01 Updated Pine packages fix security vulnerability Files available: pine-4.44-20.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:014-01 Updated nfs-utils package fixes security vulnerabilities Files available: nfs-utils-0.3.3-11.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:007-01 Updated unarj package fixes security issue Files available: unarj-2.43-13.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:004-01 Updated lesstif package fixes image vulnerability Files available: lesstif-0.93.15-4.AS21.4.i386.rpm lesstif-devel-0.93.15-4.AS21.4.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Release Announcement: Centos 3.4 x86_64 RC1
by donavan nelson 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

The CentOS team is happy to announce the availability of a release candidate for CentOS 3.4 x86_64. This product supports AMD64 and Intel EM64T processors. Individual binary iso files are available from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/3.4beta/isos/x86_64/ A bit torrent for the 4 binary iso images is available from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/3.4beta/isos/x86_64/CentOS-3.4-x86_64-discs1-… A source iso bittorrent is also available: http://beta.centos.org/centos/3.4beta/isos/x86_64/CentOS-3.4-x86_64-src1-3.… Please try to use bittorrent to download and please leave your download client running after the download is complete (with ports 6881-6889 open) as your client will become part of the peer to peer bittorrent network and reduce the load on our network mirrors. If you need some quick pointers for getting up to speed on bittorrent read: http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=24 This is a RC and may not be suitable for use in production tasks. Please add any errors or bugs you encounter to bugzilla on http://www.centos.org/bugs Everyone please download and help make this the best release possible. --------------------- To stay current with CentOS: Join the CentOS mailing list at: http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Join various team members on IRC at irc.freenode.net #centos Visit our new website at http://www.centos.org Enjoy, The CentOS Team

1 1

Re: [Centos] Regarding postfix dep for redhat-lsb
by cweisiger＠i-55.com 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

ok i checked the spec file and it has the path: Requires: /usr/sbin/groupdel Requires: /usr/sbin/groupmod Requires: /usr/sbin/sendmail <------- SENDMAIL mentioned here On my production server: I have the following: a symbolic link to the sendmail which qmail uses: sendmail -> /var/qmail/bin/sendmail I guess I could edit the SPEC file and remove the sendmail line, correct? or edit it in a way that it checks for either the symlink or the regular link for people who might be using qmail as there prefered mail system.

2 1

Regarding postfix dep for redhat-lsb
by cweisiger＠i-55.com 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

when i checked the SPEC file for redhat-lsb i did a search for postfix and it didnt find anything...how can there be a postfix dep if its not mentioned in the SPEC file for redhat-lsb?

3 2

re:[Centos] Re: centos] Postfix dep for redhat-lsb rpm
by cweisiger＠i-55.com 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Ok so your saying to just remove the redhat-lsb rpm. But, am I suppose to have that rpm for some reason...i can eliminate more packages from my system if i do remove the redhat-lsb rpm. I just though it was a required back that shouldnt be removed from the system...

2 1

crossposting: OpenVPN on CentOS(RHES clone) and Fedora Core3..some strange things
by j p 13 Jan '05

13 Jan '05

Apologies for the cross-posting to CentOS list (already mailed to OpenVPNlist).. am using OpenVPN [ http://openvpn.sf.net ] on CentOS 3.4 and having some issues.. it may possibly be an OpenVPN issue, but thought if anyone on this list is using or had any similar issues or have any thoughts.. TIA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:26:22 -0700 Subject: resend with updates: OpenVPN on CentOS(RHES clone) and Fedora Core3..some strange things To: Openvpn-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net below is my original posting with the issue I have been having.. couple of updates (alas, I still have the problem/issue)..please help..anyone..anyone..thanx 1. rebuilt the CentOS box/applied latest patches..(clone of RHES 3.0) 2. snagged 2.0 rc7 openvpn and compiled (this time pointing to already centos installed openssl RPMs/files) http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6328352&forum_id=8453 this time, I even generated the server certs on CentOS itself.. 3. same issue, OpenVPN doesn't respond aftrer in production for a day..I don't see any log activity that stands out..note, I am using TCP instead of UDP.. 4. only reboot is fixing this issue.. 5. anyone successfully using OpenVPN on RedhatEnterprise 3.x or any clones of it with out any issue? TIA ====my original posting to the list===== Greetings folks, env: 1. servers on OVPN 2.0 rc6 on FC3 and CentOS 3.3(clone of RHES 3.0 with updt3), with all latest updates..Clients are all XP SP2. using TUN on servers/clients.. 2. using in routed config, custom certs all generated on FC3 and copied/replicated on to centos box. 3. use diff ip/netwok for "server" (in server config file) directive for obvious reasons..both OVPN servers are serving the same corp/office network.. 4. using TCP instead of UDP. 5. same setof "iptables" firewall rulesets.. here is the strange thing.. OVPN on FC3 seems to work with out any issues, but the one on CentOS box does not respond, after in production for a while..I have to reboot for it to start responding..my verbose logs don't show anything..it's like, there is not even a connection being established..I have ruled out network issues etc.. external IP's on both hosts are valid and accessable, while OpenVPN on 443 port gets hung or doesn't respond on CentOS host...(i run it on TCP 443)... am getting a little tired of rebooting centos box. i guess I could cron the reboot, but I would like to find the root cause..anyone seen this issue? TIA ============================

2 1

RE: [Centos] bind and 3.4
by Holmes, Brent 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Heads up if anyone removes the caching-nameserver rpm after they fix their init scripts and replace their named.conf, it also renames your named.ca to named.ca.rpmsave( I believe this happens when you uninstall the caching-nameserver rpm, it also moves named.conf back to named.rpmsave again). So you have to move that back before you can successfully restart named. Brent -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-bounces@caosity.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:02 AM To: CentOS discussion and information list Subject: RE: [Centos] bind and 3.4 On Wed, January 12, 2005 7:51 am, Lance Davis said: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> > This is an upstream issue ... AND ... according to redhat, you >> shouldn't >> > have caching-nameserver installed on a DNS server that is anything >> other >> > than a caching-nameserver :). It is indeed the caching-nameserver >> package >> > that is causing the issue. >> > >> >> As further clarification, I point exactly to the post: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143558#c9 >> >> I think you should put the new caching-nameserver back into the U4 >> directories ... this will happen anytime redhat issues an update to >> caching-nameserver and is exactly by design. >> >> If you have DNS zones, remove caching-nameserver from that box...it is >> not >> a caching-nameserver any longer > > Well I am also going by a post from parsley to the tao mailing list :- > > http://mailman.taolinux.org/pipermail/tao-i386/2005-January/000104.html > > I dont think it is right for it to kill a working nameserver on an update, > whether or not people have it installed by mistake - ie if it is already > installed and the config files have been changd and the thing is running, > they should not be removed and the thing stopped - IMHO > > Lance > > -- I agree, _BUT_ the guy at RedHat is right ... The purpose of caching-nameserver is to setup a "caching-only-DNS" box ... the only way to setup a "caching-only-DNS" box is to remove the current named.conf file and replace it with a new one that defines it as a "caching-only-DNS" box :) The lesson learned is ... once you setup your box as a DNS zone control box, backup the named.conf file and remove the package caching-nameserver ... OR ... don't install it in the first place. My guide has been updated to remove the caching-nameserver package after finishing zone setup :). -- Johnny Hughes <http://www.HughesJR.com/> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)caosity.org http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

CentOS-3 i386 errata : caching-nameserver 3.4 update causes problems
by Lance Davis 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

I have removed the updated caching-nameserver from the core OS repo of CentOS 3.4 i386 as there have been reports of nameservers losing their configuration and stopping when the update was applied. I have reverted caching-nameserver in the 3.4 core OS back to the CentOS 3.3 version caching-nameserver-7.2-7.noarch.rpm. The new version caching-nameserver-7.3-3_EL3.noarch.rpm is now in the testing repo of 3.4. The new version is still in the .isos but it should be safe for new installs. Lance

1 0

Postfix dep for redhat-lsb rpm
by Chris Weisiger 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Is it possible to eliminate the postfix dep that is required to update to the latest redhat-lsb rpm when upgrading to 3.4 can i just download the source and remove the postfix dep and rebuild, and update the redhat-lsb rpm on my system. i dont think that the post fix dep was there when i updated to 3.3 from 3.1

2 1

The new CentOS3.4 version
by cweisiger＠i-55.com 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Im glancing through my email from the mailing list and noticed a lot of talk about centos3.4. When will it be released officially. I have read somewhere that RH is releasing RHEL 4 pretty soon....Im in no need to upgrade because my system is rather stable..just trying to get a idea of what is going on....I know i should be keeping up with the list...but it gets complicated at times. I know j. hughes is building a beta test of 3.4...Im just curious as to if if (cent3.4) is a quarterly update like going from 3.1 to 3.3 or is it a major release as will 3.4 be the same as RHEL4.

9 8

Change your default rpm query format on multi-lib archs (like x86_64)
by Johnny Hughes 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

All, I am now building rpms on, and using a multi-lib arch (x86_64) for the first time ... when using the standard command: rpm -qa | grep pkg_name The results might be pkg_name.i386 or pkg_name.x86_64 ... or both. But, the way it is shown by the default query format, looks the same ... like this: pkg_name pkg_name ---------------------------- example: [root@x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep popt popt-1.9.1-21 popt-1.9.1-21 ---------------------------- To fix this problem on multi-lib machines (and change the default query format), you can change your .rpmmacros (or create a .rpmmacros) in your user home directory and add this line: %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch} --------------------------- Now the result of the above example is: [root@x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep popt popt-1.9.1-21.x86_64 popt-1.9.1-21.i386 --------------------------- So now you can easily tell which arch of a program is installed on multi-lib machines. Thanks, Johnny Hughes

4 4

vim update for CentOS-3.3 x86_64 rebuild :(
by Tru Huynh 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Greatings, I am very sorry for having to misrebuild the vim update for x86_64 (CentOS-3.3): Wrong build host which was using a different libacl than the current CentOs-3.3... upon upgrading you might have got: ....Unable to satisfy dependencies Package vim-enhanced needs libacl.so.1(ACL_1.0)(64bit), this is not available. Package vim-minimal needs libacl.so.1(ACL_1.0)(64bit), this is not available. I have rebuild the new ones and replaced the wrong ones on the master mirror tonight Tue Jan 11 23:03:10 UTC 2005 ref: [RHSA-2005:010-01] Updated VIM packages fix security vulnerability https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-010.html ...centos-3/3.3/updates/x86_64/ RPMS/vim-common-6.3.046-0.30E.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/vim-enhanced-6.3.046-0.30E.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/vim-minimal-6.3.046-0.30E.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/vim-X11-6.3.046-0.30E.1.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/vim-6.3.046-0.30E.1.src.rpm Best regards, Tru Huynh (deeply confused)

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss