- Discuss - lists.centos.org

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 20 Dec '04

20 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:638-01 Updated gd packages fix security issues Files available: gd-1.8.4-4.21.1.i386.rpm gd-devel-1.8.4-4.21.1.i386.rpm gd-progs-1.8.4-4.21.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

PHP
by Rob Poe 19 Dec '04

19 Dec '04

Saw on Slashdot there are a few vulnerabilities with PHP. Do these vulnerabilities affect the PHP that's installed? If so, is RedHat going to backport or should I go ahead and grab from source?

3 2

Wiki Moved
by Michael Jennings 18 Dec '04

18 Dec '04

The Wiki has moved to https://wiki.caosity.org/ Please update bookmarks and such. As always, notify me if you have problems. Unless you have problems with the self-signed cert, in which case you need to "Accept this certificate permanently" and get over it. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej(a)kainx.org> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "You did not tell the truth, and so you will have to pay the consequences." -- Bob Barker, "Truth or Consequences"

4 8

Re: [Centos] Centos as a desktop
by C.M. Connelly 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

"TK" == Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz(a)optonline.net> TK> I don't want to discourage one from using Centos for a TK> workstation, but you may want to at least run TK> dual/triple/quad boot and drive a distro(s) geared for the TK> workstation/desktop as well. If your objective is to just TK> run a work station and are not looking for all the toys, TK> than Centos is for you. If you want to live on the edge, TK> have all the latest and greatest, than leave 10-15 gig on TK> the drive for the latest Fedora release. I personally TK> prefer to live on the edge on my two machines I do most of TK> my work on, it seems to minimize my learning curve going TK> forward, and also helps the community in general, but that TK> is me, and you are you. Hey, it's a *work*station. I need it to work, all the time, as it's my main gateway into all the other machines. I also need to be able to write documents, admin the other systems, duplicate and fix user problems, prototype code and websites, and so on. For play, I have a bunch of other machines in my office (including the damn Beowulf cluster that hasn't been moved yet!), a shiny Powerbook, and my keen Debian development box at home. That said, yes, if you want the very, very latest and greatest, then I guess CentOS 3 isn't your first choice, any more than Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS or AS or Debian stable would be. For edges so sharp their users are anemic, we have distros like Debian unstable, Fedora Core development (is it still Rawhide), Mandrake Cooker, and so forth. For workstations, stable OSs with support and the occasional newer package work pretty well. Claire -- *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Claire Connelly cmc(a)math.hmc.edu Systems Administrator (909) 621-8754 Department of Mathematics Harvey Mudd College *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

1 0

list suggestion
by Francois Caen 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

Hello, I'm fairly new to CentOS and to this list. I was wondering if the possibility of creating an announce-only list for CentOS had been discussed before? I'm mostly interested in patch releases and official announcements from the distro maintainers. (great job, BTW! :-) Thanks, Francois

2 1

question about Webtraffic monitoring
by Michiel van Es 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

Does anyone know a good open source and free webmonitoring software which I can use to monitor some websites and build simple uptime/downtine statistics for my customers (conform SLA's) ? Any help/hitns would be very apperciated :) -- Michiel

5 5

CentOS & openoffice.org
by Jesús García González 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

Hello all, Ive just installed CentOS using the default desktop configuration. It promised to install openoffice.org but it didnt. After a manual install (via yum install openoffice.org) the package plus dependencies install but wont start even though gnome shows all the right links Am I missing something? :-( best wishes, J.

2 2

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated gd packages fix security issues
by Will Dinkel 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The gd packages have been updated for x86_64 CentOS-3. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-638.html. RPMS/gd-1.8.4-12.3.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/gd-devel-1.8.4-12.3.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/gd-progs-1.8.4-12.3.1.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/gd-1.8.4-12.3.1.src.rpm Execute "yum update gd" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated zip package fixes security issue
by Will Dinkel 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The zip package has been updated for x86_64 CentOS-3. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-634.html. RPMS/zip-2.3-16.1.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/zip-2.3-16.1.src.rpm Execute "yum update zip" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated libxml package fixes security vulnerabilities
by Will Dinkel 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The libxml package has been updated. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-650.html. RPMS/libxml-1.8.17-9.2.x86_64.rpm RPMS/libxml-devel-1.8.17-9.2.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/libxml-1.8.17-9.2.src.rpm Execute "yum update libxml" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated samba packages fix security issue
by Will Dinkel 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The samba packages have been updated for x86_64 CentOS-3. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-670.html RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.1.i386.rpm RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.1.x86_64.rpm RPMS/samba-swat-3.0.9-1.3E.1.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.1.src.rpm Execute "yum update samba" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

Centos 3 Updates - gd
by seth vidal 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

Hi All, Centos 3 updates: gd: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-638.html i386/RPMS/gd-devel-1.8.4-12.3.1.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/gd-1.8.4-12.3.1.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/gd-progs-1.8.4-12.3.1.i386.rpm i386/SRPMS/gd-1.8.4-12.3.1.src.rpm To apply these updates just run: yum update These are on mirror.caosity.org now and should be on local mirrors within a few hours. Thanks, -sv

1 0

Re: [Centos] Centos as a desktop
by C.M. Connelly 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

"JGG" == Jesús García González <jesus(a)ceinpet.cupet.cu> "JRW" == Jacob Robert Wilkins <jrw(a)nplus1.net> JGG> What are the disadvantages (if any) of using CentOS as a JGG> desktop (as it is seen more like a server oriented distro JGG> being a clone of RHEL) JRW> It makes a decent desktop. Make sure you add in Dag's JRW> repository, Hmm. We run CentOS 3 as a desktop OS here in a couple of labs and on faculty labs with no real complaints. I do have a bunch of additional packages that I build and install, but most of those are TeX related (newer teTeX from Fedora, gv, AUC-TeX, kile, etc.). Now, *I* build and run Garnome on my workstation, but most users are reasonably happy with the standard interface. I do also give them XMMS, but only faculty have disk space available for music files (and there aren't any encoders). And we have a newer Mozilla, Firefox, Acrobat Reader, and so forth, as well as MATLAB, Maple, and other math software. It definitely works for us. Claire -- *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Claire Connelly cmc(a)math.hmc.edu Systems Administrator (909) 621-8754 Department of Mathematics Harvey Mudd College *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

3 2

Announcement: 3ware 9500S Driver disk for ISO Installs now available for 32 bit CentOS
by Seth Bardash 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

We have built and packaged a driver install disk for CentOS 3.3 for the 3ware 9500S series of SATA Raid controllers to allow iso installation and booting from a 3ware 9500S based RAID array. Its available at: http://www.integratedsolutions.org/drivers.html We only ask that you log in so we can send you update notices as new drivers become available. We will not use the information for any other purposes and will purge the database after 6 months. These drivers are based on the 3ware 9.0.2 sources and have been built for 32 bit CentOS 3.3 for the up, smp and hugemem kernel versions of 2.4.21-20.c0.EL to run on athlon and opteron based systems. A newer version is in the works based on the 3ware 9.1.5.2 version of the sources and should be available within a few weeks. This version should increase RAID 5 performance by 30% (per the 3ware people). These driver disks are free but have no waranty. They have been tested on a dual opteron based system running the 32 bit version of CentOS 3.3. (We needed this version for application compatability). The system boots with a warning about a tainted driver but functions fine (we compiled the drivers on a whitebox linux system). This will be fixed in the next release. We hope to make available the 32 bit CentOS 3.3 driver disk, 64 bit CentOS 3.3 driver disk and a CentOS 3.3 modified install script for 3dm2 within the next few weeks. Any suggestions on making these offerings better will be appreciated. More to follow. Thanks for the bandwidth, Seth Bardash Integrated Solutions and Systems 1510 North Gate Road Colorado Springs, CO 80921 719-495-5866 719-495-5870 Fax 719-337-4779 Cell -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.2 - Release Date: 12/13/2004

1 0

CentOS-2 errata update 6
by John Newbigin 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHBA-2004:401-07 Updated util-linux and mount packages RHBA-2004:458-04 Updated sh-utils package RHBA-2004:459-04 Updated fileutils package RHBA-2004:469-06 Updated piranha package RHBA-2004:476-06 Updated rusers packages RHBA-2004:487-04 Updated ucd-snmp packages RHBA-2004:493-04 Updated clumanager package RHBA-2004:496-06 Updated psacct package RHBA-2004:503-15 Updated sysstat package RHBA-2004:515-05 Updated kudzu packages RHBA-2004:527-03 Updated shadow-utils package RHBA-2004:533-03 Updated nss_ldap package RHBA-2004:534-07 Updated openssh packages RHBA-2004:575-03 Updated pam packages RHBA-2004:576-02 Updated net-tools package RHBA-2004:587-04 Updated glibc packages RHBA-2004:619-06 Updated initscripts package RHBA-2004:623-06 Updated gcc packages RHEA-2004:516-03 Updated pciutils packages RHEA-2004:548-03 Updated amanda packages RHEA-2004:605-04 Updated rsh package Files available: amanda-2.4.4p3-1.21as.i386.rpm amanda-client-2.4.4p3-1.21as.i386.rpm amanda-devel-2.4.4p3-1.21as.i386.rpm amanda-server-2.4.4p3-1.21as.i386.rpm clumanager-1.0.28-1.i386.rpm cpp-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm fileutils-4.1-10.8.i386.rpm gcc-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm gcc-c++-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm gcc-chill-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm gcc-g77-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm gcc-java-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm gcc-objc-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm glibc-2.2.4-32.18.i386.rpm glibc-2.2.4-32.18.i686.rpm glibc-common-2.2.4-32.18.i386.rpm glibc-devel-2.2.4-32.18.i386.rpm glibc-profile-2.2.4-32.18.i386.rpm initscripts-6.47.13-1.c2.1.i386.rpm kudzu-0.99.42.3.6-1.i386.rpm kudzu-devel-0.99.42.3.6-1.i386.rpm libstdc++-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm libstdc++-devel-2.96-129.7.2.i386.rpm losetup-2.11g-8.i386.rpm mount-2.11g-8.i386.rpm net-tools-1.60-19.AS21.2.i386.rpm nscd-2.2.4-32.18.i386.rpm nss_ldap-189-12.i386.rpm openssh-3.1p1-17.i386.rpm openssh-askpass-3.1p1-17.i386.rpm openssh-askpass-gnome-3.1p1-17.i386.rpm openssh-clients-3.1p1-17.i386.rpm openssh-server-3.1p1-17.i386.rpm pam-0.75-46.62.i386.rpm pam-devel-0.75-46.62.i386.rpm pciutils-2.1.8-26.3.i386.rpm pciutils-devel-2.1.8-26.3.i386.rpm perl-5.6.1-37.1.99ent.c2.1.i386.rpm perl-CGI-2.752-37.1.99ent.c2.1.i386.rpm perl-CPAN-1.59_54-37.1.99ent.c2.1.i386.rpm perl-DB_File-1.75-37.1.99ent.c2.1.i386.rpm perl-NDBM_File-1.75-37.1.99ent.c2.1.i386.rpm perl-suidperl-5.6.1-37.1.99ent.c2.1.i386.rpm piranha-0.7.0.1-1.i386.rpm psacct-6.3.2-12.21as.i386.rpm rsh-0.17-18.AS21.3.i386.rpm rsh-server-0.17-18.AS21.3.i386.rpm rusers-0.17-20.AS21.3.i386.rpm rusers-server-0.17-20.AS21.3.i386.rpm sh-utils-2.0.11-5.2.i386.rpm shadow-utils-20000902-17.c2.1.i386.rpm sysstat-5.0.5-10.21as.i386.rpm sysstat-isag-5.0.5-10.21as.i386.rpm tetex-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm tetex-afm-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm tetex-doc-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm tetex-dvilj-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm tetex-dvips-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm tetex-fonts-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm tetex-latex-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm tetex-xdvi-1.0.7-38.4.c2.1.i386.rpm ucd-snmp-4.2.5-8.AS21.4.i386.rpm ucd-snmp-devel-4.2.5-8.AS21.4.i386.rpm ucd-snmp-utils-4.2.5-8.AS21.4.i386.rpm util-linux-2.11f-20.5.i386.rpm Notes: initscripts modified to remove Red Hat trademark perl is a new centos release with the correct centos release suffix shadow-utils has been modified to fix bug #125510 tetex is a new centos release with the correct centos release suffix More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:600-01 Updated apache and mod_ssl packages fix security vulnerabilities Files available: mod_ssl-2.8.12-7.i386.rpm apache-1.3.27-9.ent.c2.1.i386.rpm apache-devel-1.3.27-9.ent.c2.1.i386.rpm apache-manual-1.3.27-9.ent.c2.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:650-01 Updated libxml package fixes security vulnerabilities Files available: libxml-1.8.14-3.i386.rpm libxml-devel-1.8.14-3.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:634-01 Updated zip package fixes security issue Files available: zip-2.3-10.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

RE: [Centos] XFS kernels ?
by Ryan Rothert 17 Dec '04

17 Dec '04

Im also looking for XFS kernel RPMs for centos... -----Original Message----- From: centos-admin(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-admin@caosity.org] On Behalf Of Martin Hamant Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 5:26 AM To: centos(a)caosity.org Subject: [Centos] XFS kernels ? Hello ! I'm looking for updated XFS kernel RPMS for Centos 3.3 ? Any idea ? -- Martin _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)caosity.org http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

3 2

CentOS-3 i386 errata - Updated zip package fixes security issue
by Lance Davis 16 Dec '04

16 Dec '04

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-634.html refers changed files :- updates/i386/RPMS/zip-2.3-16.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/zip-2.3-16.1.src.rpm yum update zip should upgrade your system These files are on mirror.caosity.org now and should be on local mirrors within a few hours. Lance

1 0

CentOS-3 i386 errata - Updated libxml package fixes security vulnerabilities
by Lance Davis 16 Dec '04

16 Dec '04

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-650.html refers Changed files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/libxml-1.8.17-9.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/libxml-devel-1.8.17-9.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/libxml-1.8.17-9.2.src.rpm yum update libxml will upgrade These are on mirror.caosity.org now and should be on local mirrors within a few hours. Lance

1 0

CentOS-3 i386 errata - Updated samba packages fix security issue
by Lance Davis 16 Dec '04

16 Dec '04

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-670.html refers changed files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/samba-swat-3.0.9-1.3E.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.1.src.rpm run yum update samba to upgrade On mirror.caosity.org now and should be on local mirrors within a few hours. Lance

1 0

Postfix on Centos3.3
by Michael Rock 16 Dec '04

16 Dec '04

Hi, as far as security advisories from Redhat I only see the last update to Postfix being 9/2/04 2.0.16-14.RHEL3. Centos3.3 however added a newer version that I am currently using which matches the last 2.0 version official release at postfix.org. /pub/cAos/centos-3/3.3/contrib/i386/RPMS/ postfix-2.0.20-1.centos3.1 Since I am running this as my public smtp server it makes me wonder why Redhat has not moved to Postfix 2.1 which is the latest official release. Anyone have a opinion whether it is safe to stick with Redhats Postfix's release on a public smtp server or should I move to 2.1? thx -- Mike __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

10 13

Centos as a desktop
by Jesús García González 16 Dec '04

16 Dec '04

Hello all, What are the disadvantages (if any) of using CentOS as a desktop (as it is seen more like a server oriented distro being a clone of RHEL) Best wishes, J

5 4

Introduction
by Avtar Gill 16 Dec '04

16 Dec '04

Hi everyone, I just wanted to introduce myself to the rest of the list. My name is Avtar Gill and I am a Computer Consultant / Systems Administrator based in Toronto, Canada. I've got several years of experience dealing with UNIX-like operating systems under my belt and I'm looking forward to contributing to this project in any way possible. Cheers, Avtar

1 0

Remote Installation
by Rob Poe 16 Dec '04

16 Dec '04

I "upgraded" a server from RH9 to CentOS remotely, as from WBEL 3.0 to CentOS 3.0, and a RH8 to CentOS 3.0.. Used YUM to do it.. HOWEVER, it was (basically) Redhat - > Redhat (based) upgrade. I have no idea how well it would work to do a Deb box that way. Maybe build a local box (or VMWare image, that way you can use the Snapshot to recover screwups), with Deb on it and try the "upgrade" .. See if it bombs out.

1 0

CentOS Remote Installation ?
by Sven 15 Dec '04

15 Dec '04

Hi. Is there a way to install centos over my actually debian or suse server like an autoinstaller script or rsync or nfs? I have no local access to the server so that the installation must be done over remote. If yes can anyone provide an faq or HowTo for a way to update my server to centos. Thanks Sven S.

5 4

Fwd: [Centos] Linuxconf ?
by beau 15 Dec '04

15 Dec '04

This went to Nico's addy rather than the list; I'm putting it back on the list in case it's of value to lurkers. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: beau <phaedral(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:44:34 -0800 Subject: Re: [Centos] Linuxconf ? To: Nico Delaere <nico(a)cerm.be> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:13:49 +0100, Nico Delaere <nico(a)cerm.be> wrote: > Can I work with linuxconf on Centos 3.3 ?? Nico, I'm studying for RHCE, the book I'm using says linuxconf is more or less deprecated. There's a bunch of other gui tools, however, that you can use instead. Login as root, open a shell, enter: [root@nicos_centos_box root]# redhat- then hit the tab key twice, and you'll get the full list. beau -- Robert Thomas ("beau") Hayes Link Open your heart, pray for peace, preach healing (c)2004ISR http://www.semanticrestructuring.com/

1 0

Exciting news about cAos & CentOS - Please read
by Matt Shields 15 Dec '04

15 Dec '04

I have the great pleasure to announce that the cAos Foundation has been given the right to an exhibitor booth at the upcoming LinuxWorld Expo in Boston, Massachusetts from February 15th - 17th. (More info here: http://www.linuxworldexpo.com/live/12/events/12BOS05A) This is a awesome opportunity to further cAos and CentOS linux. But I do not feel that we should give 1/2 an effort. I feel that we need to make a big impression. The biggest thing I am looking for is volunteers that can help me make this a large success. Just because you cannot attend also does not mean you cannot help, there are numerous ways to. Through my employer I'm trying to acquire a Exhibit Kiosk and some computers and servers for demo purposes. But there are lots of other things that I feel we need to succeed(but feel free to comment if you think of something else) Items needed: Volunteers for working in booth cAos Foundation, cAos Linux & CentOS banners & signs Marketing flyers for cAos Foundation, cAos Linux & CentOS CD's for cAos & CentOS If you have any interest in helping or have any ideas to make this a success, please contact me. Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Matt Shields http://masnetworks.biz/ http://www.caosity.org/

1 0

Linuxconf ?
by Nico Delaere 15 Dec '04

15 Dec '04

Can I work with linuxconf on Centos 3.3 ??

1 0

RPM HELP
by Up All Night Network Services 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

I can not get CentOS 3 to install GPG-KEY it reads error read fail /usr/share/rhn/RPM-GPG-KEY help Best regards, Rico Randle rico(a)uanns.com Up All Night Network Service 541.218.0492 We are good at what we do! billing(a)uanns.com support(a)uanns.com sales(a)uanns.com webmaster(a)uanns.com

2 1

What if this happens?
by Max Beerli 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

Does anyone have concern about this? What if Redhat stops giving SRPMS for new releases and updates in public? If you buy a subscription to RHEL AS and they have to give you the SRPMS because of GPL agreement can that person provide those SRPMS to public again because of GPL? They claim they are premium OpenSource company but they are still a company and for them money is bottom line. Hopefully this is all legal and we will have SRPMS one way or the other. _________________________________________________________________ Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen Technology. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=ht… Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.

5 5

[CentOS-devel] Re: [Centos] Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4 (fwd)
by Lance Davis 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

I had sent my reply to centos-devel, but as there is discussion here - here it is ... Lance ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:47:18 +0000 (GMT) From: Lance Davis <lance(a)uklinux.net> Reply-To: centos-devel(a)caosity.org To: John Newbigin <jn(a)it.swin.edu.au> Cc: centos-devel(a)caosity.org Subject: [CentOS-devel] Re: [Centos] Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4 (The beta isnt public yet - so I have moved this thread to centos-devel - where it should probably be anyway ... ) On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, John Newbigin wrote: > This is a list of issues for discussion for CentOS-4. Most of it is > based on my experience from building/maintaining CentOS-2 and observing > CentOS-3. I have not seen the CentOS-4 beta yet so I don't know if any > of this is already done. If these have been discussed on IRC then > perhaps someone could produce a shot summary of the outcomes....? > > > * Just call it CentOS-4 not 4.1 etc. Too confusing and serves no real > purpose It will be called CentOS-4 but will have 4.0,4.1,4.2 as iso releases. It means that the version of centos-release rpm will always be 4 , but the contents will probably say 4 (4.0) or somesuch. This is necessary to know what version people have installed (or at least what version they have (attempted to) upgraded to. > * All modified rpm should use mezzanine or equiv. This makes it easier > to track changes, build updates and generate a report on what has changed. That needs someone to sort it out ... and all developers to be up to speed with the packages ... > * Modified rpm should have .c4.n added to the release > - c4 = centos 4. (works well once the 4.1 is dropped) > - .n = a number starting at 1. The spec only 0 does not scale if you > need to make another spec only change. The changelog will tell you what > has changed. yes it does scale - you make it c0.1 ( or c4.0.1 ) I think it is useful to indicate a spec only change, but am happy to go with .c4.0 for this purpose if you wish, I still prefer .c0 Also there is no problem having .c0 rpms in different centos versions because they are only non changed redhat rpms with trademark edits in the specfile. If the specfile was edited so as to produce different output then that would have to be a .1 > * Mission: To stay as close to RedHat as possible > Issues: some things need to be modified to support this. For example > the cpu/memory restrictions will be removed(like in CentOS-3). Given > that we are doing this, should we also lift other artificial constraints > like installing on i386? The restraint for i586 will be removed, as I am working on doing for U4 , however I'm not sure i386 is a good idea ... It is easy enough - just build the kernel and have it in the install tree. > If we start making changes, where do we draw the line? In CentOS-2 I > have fixed some small 1 line bugs (mostly packaging issues) but this > might be a contentious issue. What about a CentOS+ repo. for enhanced > versions? Bug fixes are not contentious IMHO, but they should be pushed upstream. a CentOS+ repo sounds like a good idea if someone is prepared to do the work. I think it would have to work along the contrib lines and be experimental / not supported > * Issue: should the distro be self hosting? I think as long as the > requirements are available from the addon/extras repos. then I don't > think this is needed out of the box. Obviously the build environment > needs to be well documented and reproducible. indeed - as long as the components to make it self hosting are there then they do not need to be installed/installable from anaconda. > * Mission: Remove RedHat trademarks. > Issues: should we replace all rh logos/icons or just the ones required > by RedHat? I think if the file/words can be replaced then yes, but > package names etc. should be left alone. all of the rh/logos and icons are removed - to give a 'better user experience'. There is no need to change the package names that redhat have chosen to give to the linux community. (In rhel4 redhat-config -> system-config - and also a lot of work has been done by Fedora removing the word redhat where it is uneccesary - this has flowed through into Rhel4 - indeed even in U4 for 3.3 there are occasions where I have had to remove patches because they had been modified upstream by Fedora project and incorporated by Redhat) . > * Issue: yum > Don't ever auto-modify yum.conf. Too confusing. It is a shame that yum does not support multiple configuration directories ... > Invent a system for selecting/allocating a mirror. Users should always > use a 3rd party mirror and not the main caosity mirrors. > Issue: every mirror has different paths. We need to clean up all the > symlinks and multi versions on the mirrors. (We need someone in change > of the mirrors) There is no issue here - all of the mirrors use the same paths within the cAos repo - the mirror is just defined as the url including the path to the cAos repo - that does not cause any problems that I can see and can be used in automated scripts. Someone does need to volunteer to write the script to 'auto-modify yum.conf' to use a local mirror (ok not 'auto' maybe) - it would be done on install and manually thereafter - I am guessing a yum-config-centos rpm or some such containing a bash script that actually produces the first yum.conf on install (using the geolocate stuff) and thereafter would only write a .rpmnew unless run manually. How about the yum.conf in the actual yum rpm ?? what will happen to that ?? It is also a shame that yum cannot use iso image sets - although I wonder if with a dvd and all packages on a single disc the [base] repo could be local disc - probably not :( We have Rick Graves managing the mirror database now - I had been doing it up until recently. > * Issue: gpg key. > This should be installed by default so the user does not have to find & > import it. At a minimum it should be in /usr/share/doc/centos-release > and work like a RedHat box. agreed - I have been discussing this at length with Skvidal and Orc etc, the most recent proposal is to auto install the gpg key only if it is the same key that the yum rpm has been signed with - by checking fingerprints, otherwise to squawk. In any event to tell the user that the key has bene installed and how to check whether the key has been compromised/is the right key. (Skvidal - sorry - not had chance to discuss with you since discussiuon with Orc) > > * Issue: release QA > Before public release, a QA procedure should make sure that there are no > obvious problems (like the comps issue of 3.3). agreed > * Idea: automatic patch building. > It should be possible to build most patches without intervention. I > don't know what the current systems in place are but if there were > autobuilt unsigned patches available it would allow > - testing of patches before they are 'officially' released > - checking the progress if a patch agreed - there is no automatic system at present. Thanks for your input - great Regards Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)caosity.org http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

1 0

RE: [Centos] CentOS newbie just saying hello
by Max Beerli 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

>From: "Nigel Kendrick" <nigel.kendrick(a)petdoctors.co.uk> >Reply-To: <nigel.kendrick(a)petdoctors.co.uk> >To: <centos(a)caosity.org.> >Subject: [Centos] CentOS newbie just saying hello >Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:53:44 -0000 > >Hi folks, > >Just a quick hello having installed CentOS on my first box - an Acer >Altos G310 (P4 2.8GHz, 768MB RAM with 70GB + 300GB storage. The 300GB >unit is a SATA disk which I hope to software (hardware!?) mirror - if >I'm in for any major fun mirroring a SATA drive do let me know now - I >think hardware mirroring is not an option (yet!?) but I haven't checked >this out completely. Maybe http://3ware.com/products/serial_ata.asp I don't have SATA hardwares. How is everyone else using them hopefully without problems? I would like hardware SATA RAID in future as well. Anyone like 3ware cards for this? Stable? >This isn't my first *nix/linux install - I go all the way back to Daisy >Dnix, Xenix, SC..er..you know who..unix, via VAX VMS and CP/M on various >systems. I have a couple of RH9 boxes that will need updating soon and >I'm also running one other Acer G310 server on..er..White Box..(sorry!) >so this is kind of a 'keeping my options open' thing! I get impression that Centos development process is better compared to Whitebox because community working on OS is better than one person. _________________________________________________________________ Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen Technology http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=ht… Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.

1 0

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated ruby package fixes denial of service issue
by Will Dinkel 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

Updated ruby package is available for CentOS-3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-635.html Updated files are: RPMS/irb-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm RPMS/ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm RPMS/ruby-devel-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm RPMS/ruby-docs-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm RPMS/ruby-libs-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm RPMS/ruby-mode-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm RPMS/ruby-tcltk-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.src.rpm Execute "yum update ruby" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS newbie just saying hello
by Nigel Kendrick 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

Hi folks, Just a quick hello having installed CentOS on my first box - an Acer Altos G310 (P4 2.8GHz, 768MB RAM with 70GB + 300GB storage. The 300GB unit is a SATA disk which I hope to software (hardware!?) mirror - if I'm in for any major fun mirroring a SATA drive do let me know now - I think hardware mirroring is not an option (yet!?) but I haven't checked this out completely. This isn't my first *nix/linux install - I go all the way back to Daisy Dnix, Xenix, SC..er..you know who..unix, via VAX VMS and CP/M on various systems. I have a couple of RH9 boxes that will need updating soon and I'm also running one other Acer G310 server on..er..White Box..(sorry!) so this is kind of a 'keeping my options open' thing! This new G310 will be running Bacula to provide remote backup services for 25 regional sites, and the other G310 is being used as a mail/Web/Intranet (eGroupWare) server for our 250 staff. Thanks to all those who made CentOS what it is - hope I can 'give back' sometime by sharing my experience where relevant. Nigel Kendrick --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com) Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09/12/2004

1 0

XFS kernels ?
by Martin Hamant 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

Hello ! I'm looking for updated XFS kernel RPMS for Centos 3.3 ? Any idea ? -- Martin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:505-01 Updated kernel packages fix security vulnerability Files available: kernel-2.4.9-e.57.athlon.rpm kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.57.athlon.rpm kernel-BOOT-2.4.9-e.57.i386.rpm kernel-doc-2.4.9-e.57.i386.rpm kernel-headers-2.4.9-e.57.i386.rpm kernel-source-2.4.9-e.57.i386.rpm kernel-2.4.9-e.57.i686.rpm kernel-debug-2.4.9-e.57.i686.rpm kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.57.i686.rpm kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.57.i686.rpm kernel-summit-2.4.9-e.57.i686.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:536-01 Updated ncompress package fixes security issue and bug Files available: ncompress-4.2.4-37.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:635-01 Updated ruby package fixes denial of service issue Files available: irb-1.6.4-2.AS21.1.i386.rpm ruby-1.6.4-2.AS21.1.i386.rpm ruby-devel-1.6.4-2.AS21.1.i386.rpm ruby-docs-1.6.4-2.AS21.1.i386.rpm ruby-libs-1.6.4-2.AS21.1.i386.rpm ruby-tcltk-1.6.4-2.AS21.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

U4 beta rpms for CentOS
by lance＠uklinux.net 14 Dec '04

14 Dec '04

I have built a set of preview U4 beta rpms for CentOS i386 - these will become the basis of CentOS 3.4 when Rhel 3 U4 is released. I will not be pushing these out to the mirrors, but they are available at http://beta.caosity.org/centos/3.3/U4beta The beta packages are not signed. To add then to yum.conf add :- [u4beta] name=CentOS-$releasever - U4beta baseurl=http://beta.caosity.org/centos/$releasever/U4beta/$basearch/ gpgcheck=0 Please do not use these on production servers as consequences cannot be predicted .. I'll be rolling some beta isos in the next few days Any problems - bugzilla ... Regards Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

[CentOS-3 i386 errata - Updated ruby package fixes denial of service issue]
by Lance Davis 13 Dec '04

13 Dec '04

Of course this should be CentOS-3 arrgh - typo Lance

1 0

RHEL U4
by William Warren 13 Dec '04

13 Dec '04

Has anyone heard any rumblings as to when U4 is coming out? I am hoping they fixed the VM bugs..<G> -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"

3 2

CentOS-2 i386 errata - Updated ruby package fixes denial of service issue
by Lance Davis 13 Dec '04

13 Dec '04

An updated ruby package is available for CentOS-3.3 i386 that fixes a denial of service issue. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-635.html Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/irb-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-devel-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-docs-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-libs-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-mode-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ruby-tcltk-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.3.src.rpm These packages are available on mirror.centos.org and should be on all mirrors shortly. yum update ruby should be sufficient to upgrade these packages. Lance

1 0

kernel update with yum - no grub entry
by Paul Pianta 13 Dec '04

13 Dec '04

Hi people I am new to this list - actually I am one of (probably) a few who are jumping ship from WBEL. I feel like a bit of a scab jumping over at this time - but we all make mistakes eh? I have installed CentOS and ran 'yum update' and installed everything it prompted me for. After a reboot, I realised I had booted into the same original kernel-2.4.21-20.EL.c0smp and not the updated one - kernel-2.4.21-20.0.1.ELsmp. Upon further inspection I found that there was no entry made in grub.conf for the new kernel, and there is no initrd in /boot for this new kernel. Could someone please explain what has happened and whether it is normal behaviour or not? I am used to updating a kernel with yum and having all of the grub stuff done automatically for me :/ Now that I might have to do it manually myself I am getting all sooky and so came to this list to cry for help (and coz I'm a lazy bastard!). So ... -- pAntZ Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you do criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes!

3 4

Some questions regarding CEntos
by Max Beerli 13 Dec '04

13 Dec '04

Hello list. I am assigned the task to select a RHEL3 clone operating system for a couple of servers. So far I have found Whitehat Linux, Tao, Scientific Linux and Centos. I like the community developed aspect advantage of Centos compared to the other distros where one or couple people maintain the operating system. - Is this a long term goal project? How does it sustain itself? How much extra money is usually required on a monthly basis for operations? I noticed that developers had to pay for hosting costs when new iso images were released. Wouldn't using bittorrent cut down on downloading costs? - How does Centos compare to other RHEL clones? Are there enough developers to quickly update packages when Redhat makes security announcements? - Do Centos developers have access to RHEL3 machines or is everything done on Centos computers? For that matter do developers compile the Redhat released SRPMS + updates on RHEL computers or are binary RPM packages built on Centos operating system itself? I am asking because it would seem to me that using a full Redhat provided distro to build packages might introduce less erorrs? - What is changed from official RHEL releases besides the copyrighted logos for each Centos release? I am not talking about packages in the addons directories. Just the base os release packages. Many thank yous.Max. _________________________________________________________________ Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen Technology. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=ht… Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.

4 3

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 12 Dec '04

12 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:651-01 Updated imlib packages fix security vulnerabilities Files available: imlib-1.9.13-4.3.i386.rpm imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.13-4.3.i386.rpm imlib-devel-1.9.13-4.3.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

The package ??? is signed, but with an uknown GPG key.
by Benoit Panizzon 11 Dec '04

11 Dec '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi All Well, it looks like I run into the same problem as many others... Unfortuately the FAQ referenced in the mailinglist archive with the solution does not seam to be online anymore. What I did try: rpm --import /usr/share/rhn/RPM-GPG-KEY* rpm --import /usr/share/doc/centos-release-3.3/RPM-GPG-KEY And also: rpm --import http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3.1/i386/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-3 According to a Bug Report I've seen... Still I'm not able to update a newly installed system. Any other ideas? Regards - -Benoit- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBuvfoCVq2G/yL7/ARAkvPAKC8UGym8ad1ihKOfU2gdoIQgXzVOwCgzpjb vLLz8JTLC4W6Ycz1XruoUhE= =l2fY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

RE: [Centos] VMWare problems on CentOS 3.3 x86-64
by Ryan Rothert 11 Dec '04

11 Dec '04

I ran into this same problem with x86-64 and VMWare GSX server, VMWare does not officially support x86-64 yet. The VMWare binaries are 32bit... Ryan -----Original Message----- From: centos-admin(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-admin@caosity.org] On Behalf Of Will Dinkel Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 9:55 AM To: Rob Beard Cc: centos(a)caosity.org Subject: Re: [Centos] VMWare problems on CentOS 3.3 x86-64 Your system does have an ld-linux installed, it's just the 64-bit version from glibc x86_64: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Looks like VMWare needs the 32-bit ld-linux.so.2, which comes in glibc i686. Execute "yum install glibc.i686". Hopefully that'll get you going. On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 04:35, Rob Beard wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I'm having getting VMWare > to work on CentOS 3.3 (x86-64). > > I recently downloaded VMWare workstation 4.5 (not sure of exact > version number but its the latest version as of yesterday). I was > hoping to run CentOS as my main OS and then use VMWare to still > support Windows XP machines and run the couple of applications which refuse to work properly under Wine. > > I installed the RPM okay, ran the configuration script fro VMWare, > however when it comes to running VMware I get a message about a > missing libaray - "ld- linux.so.2". > > I did a search on the hard disk and couldn't find it. I also couldn't > find an RPM package (either source or binary) to install. > > Everything else on CentOS seems to be going okay, its really fast > compared to Suse 9.1 which I was running previously (not sure if thats > because I'm running a 64-bit OS or that CentOS doesn't have as much running at once?). > > Could anyone suggest how I can get this library? > > Regards, > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS-3 errata Updated imlib fixes security vulnerabilities
by Lance Davis 10 Dec '04

10 Dec '04

There are updated imlib packages for CentOS 3.3 (and added to 3.1) https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-651.html refers Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/imlib-1.9.13-13.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.13-13.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/imlib-devel-1.9.13-13.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/imlib-1.9.13-13.4.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3.3/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update imlib' should be sufficient.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss