- Discuss - lists.centos.org

RE: Getting kernel panic when installer starts formatting partitions. Was: [Centos] How to get 3Ware 9500S controller card working in CentOS 3.1?
by David Corredor 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

In regard of the e-mail sent on Jul/16/04 about the 3Ware 9500S. Has anyone experienced/solved this issue ?? I'm having a similar problem, I already have the system installed on a separate disk, now I want to make the filesystem on the RAID partition (using 3Ware 9500S-8). First I had the problem that the card will keep resetting after continous timeouts whenever I tried loading the module (compiled from source, in up-mode, driver v.9.2 from 3Ware's website). The solution to this was to disable APIC on the motherboard (or boot linux without APIC support). So, now the module loads ok (I've tried SMP and ENT versions, I'm using kernel 2.4.21-15.0.4-ELsmp). But the timeout and reset problem start happening again when I try to create the filesystem on the RAID partition. I can cancel the mkfs operation, but then I get a kernel panic if I try to unload the module (rmmod 3w-9xxx), just like the problem that the previous poster had. Any ideas or input would be appreciated. David

2 1

Using yum to do downgrades
by John Newbigin 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

This is a yum question but relates to some work I am doing with CentOS and other recent discussions on this list so I though I would post here first. Basically I am attempting a Red Hat 7.2 -> CentOS-2 upgrade. So far it has worked like a charm. The problem is though that yum (no doubt by design) will not downgrade packages to the CentOS versions. The problem is that some old RPMs have 72 in the release (for Red Hat 7.2) and the newer package as 21 in the release (For Enterprise Linux 2.1). Some others are updates to 7.2 which increased the version number where as 2.1 got a backported fix and increased release number. Is there a way to make yum always select a particular Vendor or Distribution? What about using yum to do an explicit downgrade "yum install mypackage-version-oldrelease"? Also, this is an rpm question, does anyone know if I can do "rpm --erase redhat-logos" and "rpm -i centos-logos" at the same time? If I put an obsoletes: tag into centos-logos will yum do that for me? Is that a good idea? At the moment I have a bash script which trys to work out the downgrade rpm commands but I can not check dependencies. Any other suggestions, tips or tricks would be appreciated. John. -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

2 2

XF86Setup
by dan1 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Hello. I am looking for the famous XF86Setup command used on RedHat 7.1 (for XFree86) but I didn't find it on CentOS 3.1. Did it change into something else ? Else how can I configure my monitor, mouse, video card settings ? Same questions for starting the hardware material configurator. How can I force it to run ? I know that it runs automatically at boot when we change a card or device, but how to force starting this program manually ? Thanks, Daniel

2 1

I hope this turns out as well as LSB maintiners hope it does
by William Warren 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1645533,00.asp?kc=ewnws091404dtx1k0000… -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"

1 0

up2date-4.2-33-1.centos.3.1
by Michael Rock 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

After installing from CD I ran up2date and it looks like I got everything updated. For some reason the up2date icon stays red and tells me that I have up2date-4.2-33-1.centos.3.1 installed but latest version is up2date-4.5.1.centos.3.1 which is the old version of up2date. All the files it wants me to up2date to are the old files. Is this normal for Centos and will it correct itself when new updates come out? thanks all. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

RHN-like system for CentOS?
by Troy Engel 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Team, Is anyone aware of a Red Hat Network alike system of server package update status that could be adapted for CentOS3? I'm not interested in the complete management aspect (channels, scheduling remote updates, etc) but merely the ability to see your list of systems and determine which are out of date with XXX packages. If you happen to manage a large-ish number of RHES3 systems, you know what a boon this is. ;) Ideas? Thx, -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

4 3

RE: [Centos] Upgrading Fedora Core 1 to CentOS
by Ho Chaw Ming 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Yes it is all the reason why we want to change to Centos (longer EOL), and we think the stability in RHE should be worth something. It's not always the best to run the newest and the best especially on a production server. So is there anyway to do it other than from yum or to manually force install all the rpm downloaded in the cache? Thanks. regards -----Original Message----- From: centos-admin(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-admin@caosity.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes Sent: 14 September 2004 19:38 To: CentOS Users Subject: Re: [Centos] Upgrading Fedora Core 1 to CentOS On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 06:24, William Warren wrote: > depends on your definition of downlgrade..i see it as the > oposite..fedora's lifecycle is not nearly as long as RHEL 3..:) Agreed, from a stability and lifecycle perspective, CentOS is much better than (and in my opinion an upgrade to) Fedora Core 1. But from a package perspective, many of the items in an up2date Fedora Core 1 install are newer than the packages in CentOS, so they won't upgrade via yum (since the installed Fedora Core 1 packages are already newer). > > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 20:51, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > >>It is a downgrade and not an upgrade to go from CentOS to Fedora > >>Core 1 ... CentOS is an upgrade from RedHat 9 but a Downgrade from FC1. > > > > > > I meant that it is a downgrade to go from FC1 to CentOS ... as RHEL > > 3 was released from RedHat 9.0 code, then FC1 was released later. > > > > Johnny Hughes _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)caosity.org http://www.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

CentOS 3.1: sshd and pam /etc/security/limits.conf file descriptor settings problem
by Sean Staats 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Why can't non-uid 0 users have more than 1024 file descriptors when logging in via ssh? I'm trying to allow a user to have a hard limit of 8192 file descriptors(system defaults to 1024) via the following setting in /etc/security/limits.conf: jdoe hard nofile 8192 But when jdoe logs in via ssh and does 'ulimit -Hn' he gets '1024' as a response. If he tries to set it with 'ulimit -Hn 8192' he gets an 'Operation not permitted' error. If jdoe instead telnets to the box, he gets the hard limit of 8192 file descriptors. Here is what happens when I set the hard limit to 512 in limits.conf: jdoe hard nofile 512 When jdoe logs in via ssh, he gets a hard limit of 512 file descriptors. The same goes for telnet. So ssh is certainly reading the limits.conf file and applying the settings, so long as nofile <= 1024. Why won't ssh allow users to have more than 1024 file descriptors??? Many thanks! -Sean

1 2

Kickstart and aliased network interfaces
by Ralph Angenendt 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Hi, small(?) problem here: We have several servers which have aliased interfaces (e.g. gigabit: one alias points to the net the backupserver is in, the other one "connects" to the filer the machine needs for work). So I'd like to generate this setup with kickstart (yes, I *could* do that with cfengine or other tools, but want to have the general config in kickstart). Alas: network --bootproto=static --device=eth1:0 --ip=10.65.193.166 --netmask=255.255.255.0 isn't really taken well by anaconda, it barfs up some python-backtrace and stops the installation (it would be neat, if this would be handled friendlier, as in "would you like to continue even though I don't know what you mean"). Any solution for that? Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra(a)br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...HA-Multimedia | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Rundfunkplatz 1........80300 München | .which cannot be justified on any other Tl:089.5900.16023..Fx:089.5900.16240 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC

2 1

Up2date confusion
by Michael Rock 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Hi, I installed 3.1 from CD and ran up2date without changing /etc/sysconfig/rhn/rhn-source. Checking some of the files it appears I have all the updates including the updates from the last few weeks. However up2date for some reason shows that I still need to update and lists old and current files in the list of available updates. Any idea why this is so and how to fix it? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

4 6

Re: [Centos] Up2date Unknown GPG signatures
by Michael Rock 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Thanks, I missed this in the FAQ. http://www.centos.org/index.php?option=faq&task=viewfaq&artid=24&Itemid=5 --- Jacob Robert Wilkins <jrw(a)nplus1.net> wrote: > > rpm --import > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3.1/i386/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-3 > > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:34:41PM -0700, Michael > Rock wrote: > > I just ran up2date on new Centos-3.1 installation > and > > received about 5 of these errors. Is this > something > > to be concerned about? > > > > The package kernel-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL is signed with > an > > unknown GPG signature. Continue > > The package kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.3 is signed with > an > > unknown GPG signature. Continue? > > The package GConf2-2.2.1-4 is signed with an > unknown > > GPG signature. Continue? > > > > It is using the default sources file from the CD. > > http://mirror.centos.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. > > http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)caosity.org > > http://www.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

1 0

Time synch
by William Warren 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

How can i have my centOS-3 system synch to a time server on the internet? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"

4 9

Up2date Unknown GPG signatures
by Michael Rock 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

I just ran up2date on new Centos-3.1 installation and received about 5 of these errors. Is this something to be concerned about? The package kernel-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue The package kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.3 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? The package GConf2-2.2.1-4 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? It is using the default sources file from the CD. http://mirror.centos.org/ _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool

1 0

Change IP Address
by Beth Curotto 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Can someone tell me how to change my system IP Address from the command line in Centos-3? Beth

2 1

Re: [Centos] 3Ware Escalade 9500S controller question
by Scott Lewis 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

3 2

Apt repositories for CentOS?
by Shawn M. Jones 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings again folks, One of the things I like about Fedora Core is the fact that I can add apt as a repository tool. Has anyone done this for CentOS-3? Why was yum chosen? I prefer apt over yum because of features and was wondering if anyone had created an apt repository for CentOS. Thanks in advance for the info, I'm not trying to start an apt vs. yum discussion/war. I know the two can coexist on the same server, so... Also, what's the deal with up2date on CentOS-3 nowadays? Is it just my server that was having the freaky python error messages? I've been using yum for a month or so now. Sincerely, - --Shawn - -- - -- Shawn M. Jones <smj(a)littleprojects.org> http://www.littleprojects.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBP9OPgaOAAb5cjIkRAikuAJ9d4/8t1+lx/M1S9Wc5s6/l3SVaeACfXnoU 3RSTJP+t5DwxXJEbz4GcoHI= =3A++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 5

3Ware Escalade 9500S controller question
by Shawn M. Jones 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings folks, I'm currently redoing my home server as one of the hard drives in my RAID-1 array went down and I'm going to replace the lot of it with a 3Ware Escalade 9500S RAID capable card and four Seagate 200GB SATA drives. These drives are supposedly the coolest and quietest SATA drives available (better than the Maxtors I had anyway) and the capacity upgrade on the server is worth the $$$ at this point. I'm planning on running them in RAID-5 for maximum disk space and performance. Are there any 3Ware Escalade/SATA issues I should be aware of when building this new server utilizing CentOS-3? The card was supposedly supported under RH9, so I figured RHEL3 (or clones) would be fine. Thanks in advance for the feedback, - --Shawn - -- - -- Shawn M. Jones <smj(a)littleprojects.org> http://www.littleprojects.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBP9K3gaOAAb5cjIkRArVLAJ90/xrq4j8qsu8oAj6vaJlBS5pUAQCggH3a fUKM52EQlz/BzR9q5dLKrvQ= =RfLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

new gaim packages? (RHSA-2004:400-01)
by Ajay Sharma 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

has this package been rebuilt? I didn't see an announcement for it. --Ajay, who's not bitchin', just wondering... -------- Original Message -------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated gaim package fixes security issues Advisory ID: RHSA-2004:400-01 Issue date: 2004-09-07 Updated on: 2004-09-07 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Obsoletes: RHSA-2004:033 CVE Names: CAN-2004-0500 CAN-2004-0754 CAN-2004-0784 CAN-2004-0785 - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Summary: An updated gaim package that fixes several security issues is now available. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS version 3 - i386, ia64, ppc, s390, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Desktop version 3 - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES version 3 - i386, ia64, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS version 3 - i386, ia64, x86_64 3. Problem description: Gaim is an instant messenger client that can handle multiple protocols. Buffer overflow bugs were found in the Gaim MSN protocol handler. In order to exploit these bugs, an attacker would have to perform a man in the middle attack between the MSN server and the vulnerable Gaim client. Such an attack could allow arbitrary code execution. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2004-0500 to this issue. Buffer overflow bugs have been found in the Gaim URL decoder, local hostname resolver, and the RTF message parser. It is possible that a remote attacker could send carefully crafted data to a vulnerable client and lead to a crash or arbitrary code execution. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2004-0785 to this issue. A shell escape bug has been found in the Gaim smiley theme file installation. When a user installs a smiley theme, which is contained within a tar file, the unarchiving of the data is done in an unsafe manner. An attacker could create a malicious smiley theme that would execute arbitrary commands if the theme was installed by the victim. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2004-0784 to this issue. An integer overflow bug has been found in the Gaim Groupware message receiver. It is possible that if a user connects to a malicious server, an attacker could send carefully crafted data which could lead to arbitrary code execution on the victims machine. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2004-0754 to this issue. Users of Gaim are advised to upgrade to this updated package which contains Gaim version 0.82 and is not vulnerable to these issues. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure that all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Use Red Hat Network to download and update your packages. To launch the Red Hat Update Agent, use the following command: up2date For information on how to install packages manually, refer to the following Web page for the System Administration or Customization guide specific to your system: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/ 5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ for more info): 126842 - CAN-2004-0500 Gaim MSN protocol vulnerabilities 6. RPMs required: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS version 3: SRPMS: ftp://updates.redhat.com/enterprise/3AS/en/os/SRPMS/gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.src… 4daa55a0489b9eb37c079c8d5f5b6b59 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.src.rpm i386: 16a0c2078927b793b9186eeb83e93be0 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.i386.rpm ia64: 9f88b162909aafb41bca2ad76c5faf45 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.ia64.rpm ppc: 7f37d28cb2c1e5b9c87807afff904147 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.ppc.rpm s390: 892285056f0b54a4b460ac2bb37a9fd2 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.s390.rpm s390x: b123c085ecb9ec973266b7b68c410c9c gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.s390x.rpm x86_64: 9091ab5c18b428e8cf933e2a0767fb77 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Desktop version 3: SRPMS: ftp://updates.redhat.com/enterprise/3desktop/en/os/SRPMS/gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL… 4daa55a0489b9eb37c079c8d5f5b6b59 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.src.rpm i386: 16a0c2078927b793b9186eeb83e93be0 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.i386.rpm x86_64: 9091ab5c18b428e8cf933e2a0767fb77 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES version 3: SRPMS: ftp://updates.redhat.com/enterprise/3ES/en/os/SRPMS/gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.src… 4daa55a0489b9eb37c079c8d5f5b6b59 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.src.rpm i386: 16a0c2078927b793b9186eeb83e93be0 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.i386.rpm ia64: 9f88b162909aafb41bca2ad76c5faf45 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.ia64.rpm x86_64: 9091ab5c18b428e8cf933e2a0767fb77 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS version 3: SRPMS: ftp://updates.redhat.com/enterprise/3WS/en/os/SRPMS/gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.src… 4daa55a0489b9eb37c079c8d5f5b6b59 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.src.rpm i386: 16a0c2078927b793b9186eeb83e93be0 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.i386.rpm ia64: 9f88b162909aafb41bca2ad76c5faf45 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.ia64.rpm x86_64: 9091ab5c18b428e8cf933e2a0767fb77 gaim-0.82.1-0.RHEL3.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://www.redhat.com/security/team/key.html#package 7. References: http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=0 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=1 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=2 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=3 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=4 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=5 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=6 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0500 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0754 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0784 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0785 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert(a)redhat.com>. More contact details at https://www.redhat.com/security/team/contact.html Copyright 2004 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBPdaDXlSAg2UNWIIRAizBAJ9orm7H7CHW/hEba9bxTrHZTNQQpwCeKGjX FinUptKP9j4PQpFUEbHXvRI= =7Hnj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Enterprise-watch-list mailing list Enterprise-watch-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-watch-list -- --------------------- Satyajot (Ajay) Sharma REVShare Corp System Administrator

4 5

re:[Centos] php-snmp
by Dan 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

I took a look at the spec file and there was nothing about snmp commented out. So did a search for a spec file for EL3 and found one which had the snmp module set to build. Looked it over and copied what sections refer to snmp. When I add the line: %file snmp -f files.snmp I get the error-> Could not open %file /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/php-4.3.2/files.snmp: No such file or directory If I remove this line, I get an error about an upackaged file that is called snmp.o Reading up I found that if you receive the second error you need to add the %file line for the file that is missing and that is what I did in the first place. I have never built my own rpm before so I am new to this. Any help would be appreciated. Here is a link to the spec file http://traffic.wonderwave.net/php.spec Dan On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 09:50, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, John Newbigin wrote: > > > I have build php-snmp & php-oci8 for CentOS-2 but I assume you are referring > > to CentOS-3.1 > > > > The CentOS-2 version is available under centos-2/extras/i386/ on the centos > > mirror. > > If you can send me the SPEC files, I can look into providing these for > el2.1 and el3 (i386, x86_64) > > Kind regards, > -- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- > [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

2 1

Re: [Centos] migrating RH9 to CentOS-3
by John Newbigin 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

Rick Graves wrote: > John, > > I think the error that I encountered earlier this week > was because I am now blocked from accessing the main > CentOS mirror. > > At any rate, today I tried a different mirror, and at > least yum would run. > > I am still on the RH9 X install. > > I tried yum update, and got this: > > Resolving dependencies > .......Unable to satisfy dependencies > Package mozilla-psm needs mozilla = 37:1.4-3.0.18, > this is not available. > Package mozilla-psm needs mozilla-nss = 37:1.4-3.0.18, > this is not available. > > Can you shed anly light on this? There will be cases which need special handling. I think mozilla-psm is now included in the core mozilla package. If the new mozilla does not have the correct tags to tell yum that mozilla-psm can be removed then you have have to remove it manually beforehand. These are the kinds of tasks which we need documented. I was also thinking, it might be possible to create dummy packages which provide these kinds of dependencies so you can add the dummy module to your yum.conf and then it will be more automatic. There are others on the list that know more about yum than me and might have some ideas. John. > > Thanks, > > Rick > > > > > --- John Newbigin <jn(a)it.swin.edu.au> wrote: > > >>Rick Graves wrote: >> >> >>>John, >>> >>>I took another look at your migration page. I >> >>have >> >>>two questions. >>> >>>1) It seems the errata support only applies to >> >>moving >> >>>from RHEL3 to CentOS-3 -- correct? >> >>And RHEL2.1 to CentOS-2. >> >>>2) The Live Update option does not apply to moving >> >>off >> >>>RedHat 9, but does apply to moving off RedHat 7.2? >> >> >>Live update from RH9 -> CentOS-3.1 should work. See >>this page for details: >> > > http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=276534 > >>>I think I will try a Live Update on my test bench >> >>RH 9 >> >>>system. >>> >>>As you pointed out before, there is no big rush. >> >>On >> >>>the other hand, the value of this information >> >>dimishes >> >>>over time, as there is no point in making the >>>information available after everyone on the planet >> >>has >> >>>upgraded from the RedHat versions to something >> >>else. >>True. >> >>>Looking at your migration page again made me >> >>realize >> >>>that the Live Update option is high risk. >> >>Obviously, >> >>>someone who cares about they systems would choose >> >>Live >> >>>Update as a last choice. Clean new install on >> >>extra >> >>>hardware seems to be the best way to go. >> >>Indeed, but I have some old boxes running 7.2 which >>I have not got round >>to upgrading yet. If the procedure was as easy as >>running a single >>shell script I might be more inclined to update it. >> >>Did you look at my updated web page? (it was only >>updated yesterday). I >>have also started a diagram to show the distro >>family tree. Feedback is >>welcome. You will need >>http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/ to view it. >> >>John. >> >> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Rick >>> >>>--- John Newbigin <jn(a)it.swin.edu.au> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Rick Graves wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>John, >>>>> >>>>>I did not hear back from you right away. Maybe >>>> >>>>doing >>>> >>>> >>>>>all the combinations is too big a job for one >>>> >>>>person. >>>> >>>> >>>>>It might work if we split them up. >>>> >>>>Details of each procedure should be split up but >> >>we >> >>>>need somewhere to >>>>collect all the info. I don't think we need to >> >>rush >> >>>>it. >>>> >>>>I started a web page to collect my ideas >>>> >>> >>> > http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/centos-2/migration.htm > >>>>Obviously it is just a start. I thinking a semi >>>>intelligent 'wizard' >>>>where you select your current OS and either >>>>acceptable upgrade methods >>>>OR target OS and it will spit out the procedure. >>>> >>>>Each procedure could have a forum where people can >>>>contribute feedback, >>>>like they do with the php manual. >>>> >>>>I think a plan of attack is to collect information >>>>while we wait for the >>>>new web site to appear. Hopefully that will >>>>minimize duplication of effort. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>I could do these two: >>>>> >>>>>RedHat 9 -> reinstall CentOS-3.1 >>>>>RedHat 9 -> live update to CentOS-3.1 >>>> >>>>I think this will be a popular procedure so it >> >>would >> >>>>be good to have >>>>this well documented. I know there is some >>>>information on this already >>>>though I have not tried it out. >>>> >>>>Another thing I might have a play with is a family >>>>tree. That might >>>>help people see the differences between versions. >>>> >>>>John. >>>> >>>> >>>>>I am volunteering for these because I already >> >>have >> >>>>>RedHat 9 and CentOS-3.1 CD's. >>>>> >>>>>The only rub is on Saturday I go on vacation, and >>>> >>>>at >>>> >>>> >>>>>the end of August I will be back to where I have >>>> >>>>my >>>> >>>> >>>>>computer junk. I could do those two in early >>>>>September. >>>>> >>>>>Any other volunteers for any of the other >>>>>combinations? >>>>> >>>>>My offer to work it all into the web site still >>>>>stands. >>>>> >>>>>Rick >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>--- Rick Graves <gravesricharde(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 06:13:59 -0700 (PDT) >>>>>>From: Rick Graves <gravesricharde(a)yahoo.com> >>>>>>Subject: Re: migration center >>>>>>To: centos(a)caosity.org >>>>>> >>>>>>John, >>>>>> >>>>>>Would you like to take a first crack at the text >>>> >>>>for >>>> >>>> >>>>>>the migration center? You could then run it by >>>> >>>>this >>>> >>>> >>>>>>group. >>>>>> >>>>>>If we get something that is good enough not to >> >>get >> >>>>>>shot down here, I will work it into the web >> >>site. >> >>>>>>If we decide to go with separate sites, the text >>>>>>could >>>>>>just be copied over, so there would be no wasted >>>>>>effort. >>>>>> >>>>>>Rick >>>>>> >>>>>>--- centos-request(a)caosity.org wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>Message: 8 >>>>>>Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:28:57 +1000 >>>>>>From: John Newbigin <jn(a)it.swin.edu.au> >>>>>>To: centos(a)caosity.org >>>>>>Subject: Re: [Centos] suggestions for CentOS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>... >>>>>> >>>>>>I think another thing we should have is a >> > === message truncated === > > > -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Maintainers and security updates
by Michael Rock 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

Hi, can someone tell how many are behind maintaining the site and converting security and regular RHEL fixes for Centos-3? I see the last round of security updates for RHEL were turned out in a day which is impressive. Trying to get an idea if Centos has alot of community support and being maintained by more than one person. I am not confident enough yet in building my own updates. I am another RH 7.1/8.0 admin that labored over the decision to go with Fedora Legacy 6 months for these servers only to find mailings to stop without any notice. Since it seemed awfully quiet for a time I checked their website and found support suspended for these version due to lack of community involvement. So doing a little more investigating this time to see if the community is really into the project before settling down with a solution. thx __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

6 7

Updates? Last samba package from RedHat? Cd images for update 3?
by Alex Georgiev 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

Dear Centos-3 Maintainers, there are several new (september) packages from redhat for RHEL3 especially https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-430.html (samba 3.0.6). Perhaps these new packages are not security updates, but .... I am having problems printing in current samba-3.0.4-6.3E which I believe shall be resolved with the new samba. Do you guys intend to rebuild last redhat updates, or I should do it on my own? Also, do you intend to make new CD images with the new RHEL update 3? This will make installing centos on SATA machines possible! Thank you very much for your efforts and work. Best regards, A. Georgiev

3 2

Centos3.1-U3 ETA ?
by Beau Henderson 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

Just curious, haven't seen much discussion on this or anything in the news page. Is U3 being built yet ? Might we expect to see a test release sometime soon ? -- Beau Henderson JustManaged.com - Affordable Linux Administration & Security Services.

2 1

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:440-01 An updated lha package fixes security vulnerability Files available: lha-1.00-17.3.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:408-01 Updated mod_ssl package fixes minor vulnerability Files available: mod_ssl-2.8.12-6.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

php-snmp
by Dan 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

Hello list. Anyone have a php rpm with snmp enabled or a php-nsmp rpm? I need to build some php pages and would like to use the snmp function that are built in. If there is another way to enable it by not using one of these rpm's that would be great too. TIA Dan

3 3

OT: firewalls
by donavan nelson 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

What is everyone using for a firewall? I'm currently using www.astaro.com but their recent releases have soured me on ASL as a practical solution on my hardware (1.2MHz Athlon, 30G, and 256M). I only have 4 computers going through the firewall wall but it's consistently at 50% cpu load. There is very little network traffic (<10k bits per second on the wan connection, < 40k bits per second between other internal lans (I have 4 internal lans and a wan)) Basically I'm using it for: packet filtering, masq, port forwarding, IDS, dns proxy (only if my internal DNS servers have failed) smtp proxy smtp virus protection smtp spam protection http proxy (caching) http virus protection http url monitoring (via Cobain) the firewall also monitors a bunch of statistics, etc. I'm looking for something that is installed, configured and runs. I don't want to be tweaking this parameter of postfix, that parameter of the smtp virus protection, etc. I want something that just works that I don't need to play with except for new rules, etc. I'll pay a reasonable price for a package that I can test to verify suitable performance (I'm not a commercial operation, this is just for my toys). At the moment, I'm looking at Gibraltar. But the community seems small. I haven't downloaded it yet but I'm considering it an option for this round of firewall evaluation. Any other suggestions for inclusion? BTW, anything like smoothwall that allows wide open outbound connections and doesn't support a box with 5 network cards off the CD is not a viable candidate. Thanks much all, .dn

4 3

Autologons
by Dominic Iadicicco 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

Hello all, Anyone know how to do autologon's in Linux console mode? Or maybe a web site that has directions that does. Thanks all Dominic Iadicicco _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush

2 1

Re: instructions for mirrors
by Rick Graves 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

Lance, > We need to change the instructions for becoming a > mirror as it wont be > possible to populate their mirror before telling us > about it , we will > need to request an access ip address first. I updated the "notes for mirrors" page. I added a new line, about 5 paragraphs down from the top. I do not fully understand what you wrote, so I followed your wording as closely as I could. Please take a look, and let me know if my wording needs clarification. Rick

1 0

pptp
by Petr "Qaxi" Klima 07 Sep '04

07 Sep '04

Hi Does anybody get packaged pptpd and/or ppp-mppe krnel module? Petr Klima

2 1

Re: mirror change
by Rick Graves 06 Sep '04

06 Sep '04

Greg, Does this change effect me? My (default) yum.cong files point to mirror.centos.org. Do I need to point at different mirrors? At about midnight Sunday night your time, I was experimenting with migrating RedHat 9 to CentOS-3. When I tried yum check-update, I got an error message that http://mirror.centos.org could not be found. BTW, twice I tried to send this message to caos-mirror(a)casosity.org like you asked, and twice it came back immediately as undeliverable. (I copied and pasted the address.) Rick

1 0

mirror.caosity.org change...
by Greg Kurtzer 06 Sep '04

06 Sep '04

sorry for the massive cross-post, but I wanted to make sure that I get everyone that needs to know this. Mirror.caosity.org is having problems keeping up with all of the mirrors. Rsync is a memory hog when dealing with large repositories, and mirror just can't handle it. I am migrating mirror.caosity.org to a new host which should be able to handle the load better. Also, I will be limiting the IP's that can rsync directly to mirror. Only the public mirrors will be allowed to connect directly to mirror.caosity.org via rsync. Expect this migration to happen in the next several days, and please let me and the caos-mirror list know if there are any problems. Also, comments and concerns should be sent to caos-mirror(a)casosity.org. Thanks. Greg -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/

2 1

Re: [Centos] error on 3ware controller
by Scott Lewis 03 Sep '04

03 Sep '04

2 1

error on 3ware controller
by Maurizio Sparesotto 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hi all, after an uprade to new kernel 2.4.21-15.0.4.EL on my server appears a lot of these messages: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,17)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 19268224 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,17)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 19268225 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,17)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 19268226 I try to rebuild array but at the 12% appears this message 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: INFO: Rebuild started: Unit #0. 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: ERROR: Drive error: Port #0. 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: ERROR: Rebuild failed: Unit #0. I restarted again the rebuild but 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: INFO: Rebuild started: Unit #0. 3w-xxxx: scsi2: Unit #0: Command (f7545c00) timed out, resetting card. Ok, I'm a solid Rock, I try to rebuild again but at the 68% the rebuild failed again.. Of course I checked RAM and HD and all is OK, I also changed the IDE cables. HW proliant ML370 G2 wtih 2 GB RAM 1 controller 3ware escalade 7000-6 2 HD Samsung 160GB RAID1 2 SCSI seagate cheetah 18GB SW RAID1 So, is this a Kernel bug ? Thank You, Maurizio

1 0

Re: Alternative architecture CentOS 3 builds
by Rick Graves 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hey Nels, I recently (within the last couple of days) updated the FAQ with fresh, up-to-date information. What achitectures are supported? cAos x86 currently and x86_64 (AMD64) soon CentOS-2 x86 only (sorry) CentOS-3 x86 currently and x86_64 (AMD64) soon Get it from the source here: http://caosity.org/index.php?option=faq&task=viewfaq&artid=3&Itemid=5 I was told that AMD64 would be supported "soon". We could pin Greg down if you need a more specific answer. Rick --- centos-request(a)caosity.org wrote: > CentOS appears to only be available for the i386 > architecture. Are > alternative architecture rebuilds outside the scope > of the CentOS > project, or is there some other specific reason for > that? > > > Nels Lindquist <*> > Information Systems Manager > Morningstar Air Express Inc. > >

1 0

Alternative architecture CentOS 3 builds?
by Nels Lindquist 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hi there. Although RHEL 3 is available for several different architectures, CentOS appears to only be available for the i386 architecture. Are alternative architecture rebuilds outside the scope of the CentOS project, or is there some other specific reason for that? If one wanted to rebuild CentOS for, let's say the AMD64 architecture, would that be a difficult process, or is it just something that nobody's yet done? I'm currently buying an AMD64 system and I'm curious. ---- Nels Lindquist <*> Information Systems Manager Morningstar Air Express Inc.

2 1

Killing process
by Dominic Iadicicco 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hello all, I have noticed that sometimes when I have a run-a-way process, I can't kill it. Is their any special thing to do about that. I mean when kill -15 0r -9 XXXXX don't work. Any input is apperecated. Thanks all __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Killing process
by Dominic Iadicicco 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hello all, I have noticed that sometimes when I have a run-a-way process, I can't kill it. Is their any special thing to do about that. I mean when kill -15 0r -9 XXXXX don't work. Any input is apperecated. Thanks all _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush

1 0

Killing process
by Dominic Iadicicco 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hello all, _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Updates for Centos3
by seth vidal 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hi Everyone, Updates for Centos3 httpd: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-349.html updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.src.rpm lha: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-323.html updates/i386/RPMS/lha-1.14i-10.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/lha-1.14i-10.4.src.rpm rsync: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-436.html updates/i386/RPMS/rsync-2.5.7-5.3E.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/rsync-2.5.7-5.3E.src.rpm Let me know if there are any problems. To update for any of these simply run: yum update -sv

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 01 Sep '04

01 Sep '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:436-01 Updated rsync package fixes security issue Files available: rsync-2.5.7-3.21AS.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo?]
by sophana 01 Sep '04

01 Sep '04

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo? Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200 From: sophana <sophana78(a)yahoo.fr> To: Dag Wieers <dag(a)wieers.com> References: <412B3E8B.7020805(a)yahoo.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016(a)horsea.3ti.be> Dag Wieers wrote: >Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think > > CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1 > CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U2 > >Although I would have prefered CentOS to follow the Red Hat numbering >instead of adding confusion. Soon U3 will be released and there will >probably be a CentOS 3.2 release. Ok I understand, I thought the RHEL2.1 has existed so I also thought that RHEL 3.1 existed also. I would also have prefered strict redhat numbering: centos 3 update2 If redhat release RHEL3.1 what will be centos name? >>For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any problem? > >No, any problem you encounter should be reported and fixed. It is >all designed to work together. (except for kernel module packages) > evms needs a set of kernel patch to be applied. Do you think I can find one already patched or I should do it myself? If I do it, would you be interested in having the evms patched rpm? (I don't know how to do a rpm, but I can try) Is there a problem that a package depends on a kernel rpm? Regards

1 0

[Fwd: Whitepaper about the new security features in RHEL3 U3]
by John Newbigin 31 Aug '04

31 Aug '04

http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/rhel/WHP0006US_Execshield.pdf -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Whitepaper about the new security features in RHEL3 U3 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:54:15 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon) <taroon-list(a)redhat.com> To: taroon-list(a)redhat.com Hi, with the beta of RHEL3U3 out for some time it should come of no suprise that U3 is comming out sometime soon. In preparation of that I wrote a whitepaper about the new security features that were added to U3: http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/rhel/WHP0006US_Execshield.pdf If anyone here has questions about this stuff please just ask... Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc., 1989 -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin -- Taroon-list mailing list Taroon-list(a)redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 31 Aug '04

31 Aug '04

I am currently in the process of updating all centos modified packages to contain the release suffix .c2.$n This will help identify modified packages and aid with RedHat -> CentOS upgrades. These packages have been rebuilt but should be the same as the previous release. It should be safe to update them but of course when upgrading the boot loader it is always wise to use some caution. The following packages for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: Files available: grub-0.90-11.c2.1.i386.rpm mkinitrd-3.2.6.2-1.c2.1.i386.rpm indexhtml-7.2-1.c2.1.noarch.rpm There will be more package to follow including apache, nautilus, perl, tetex & Xconfigurator. These will be available soon. The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 31 Aug '04

31 Aug '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:448-01 Updated krb5 packages fix security vulnerabilities Files available: krb5-devel-1.2.2-31.i386.rpm krb5-libs-1.2.2-31.i386.rpm krb5-server-1.2.2-31.i386.rpm krb5-workstation-1.2.2-31.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Updates for Centos3
by seth vidal 31 Aug '04

31 Aug '04

Hi Everyone, Critical security updates for centos3. Available from: http://mirror.caosity.org/centos-3/3.1/ and soon your local mirror. krb5: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-350.html updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-server-1.2.7-28.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.2.7-28.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-workstation-1.2.7-28.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.2.7-28.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/krb5-1.2.7-28.src.rpm The vulnerabilities involved look pretty ugly. Let me know if there are any problems. To update for any of these simply run: yum update -sv

1 0

Messing around with iptables
by scty Library 27 Aug '04

27 Aug '04

Hello all, I am messing around with iptables, trying to learn how it works so that I can build my self a router/firewall and mabey a VPN. Anyway I tried to use a command on my Desktop CentOS3 machine. "iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -p icmp -j DROP" now the command seems to have went through because I didn't get any errors, but when I go to ping 127.0.0.1 I am getting a response and my packet loss is 0%. It should be 100% packet loss. Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong. I am not trying to do anything yet, just want to learn by exploring. Thanks all. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

6 10

Novell Evolution Connector
by Johnny Hughes 27 Aug '04

27 Aug '04

I just built a version of the Novell Evolution Connector (to use Evolution with a MS exchange server) that works with RHEL/WBEL/CentOS/TaoLinux. You can get it from here if you are interested... http://www.hughesjr.com/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,34/task,view_cat… Here is the Novell link: http://www.novell.com/products/connector/ Johnny Hughes http://www.hughesjr.com/

2 3

redhat-config-packages
by xspace 25 Aug '04

25 Aug '04

anyone fix the redhat-config-packages bug (https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632) I cant life without redhat-config-packages :)

1 0

is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo?
by xspace 25 Aug '04

25 Aug '04

im sure CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (without update) and CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss