Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 56, Issue 1
by Giuseppe By Computer srl 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Spett.le Cliente, dal 7 Settembre 2009 al 25 Settembre 2009 non sarò in grado di leggere le email inviate a questo indirizzo. Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl http://www.computersrl.com/home/index.php?option=com_jforms&view=form&id=3&… o chiamare il numero 0438.450500 Grazie Giuseppe Corazzin COMPUTER srl Via Conegliano 94/b - 31058 SUSEGANA (TV) Web: www.computersrl.com

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 i386 dnsmasq Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 dnsmasq Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:10:22 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 i386 dnsmasq Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090901151022.GA10326(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 15068053a0aeea31232c06e17b88d2e7 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.i386.rpm Source: 88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:10:23 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 dnsmasq Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090901151023.GA10341(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm Source: 88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 1 **********************************************

1 0

setup iptables to allow forwarding through eth1
by Peter Peltonen 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

I have a fresh installed CentOS 5.3 server which should route traffic between two networks like this: network A (Internet) -- eth0 (default gw) : server : eth1 -- network B (LAN) I have set in sysctl.conf net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 and routing works fine like this. But when I switch on the iptables service (with default setup, configured when installing the server), routing stops working (or at least I cannot ping a server in network A from network B). I guess the firewall is stopping it, so I read http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Deployment_Guide/s1-firewall-ipt-fwd.… and issued the commands # iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -j ACCEPT # iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -j ACCEPT but that did not help. So I am asking: what is the correct iptables command to make forwarding work? Regards, Peter

3 3

yum priorities and rpmforge...
by John Doe 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Hi, I am using the yum priorities plugin and, for some reason, it is blocking all rpmforge updates, even for already installed rpmforge packages... I have priority=1 for CentOS repos. Is it the 'normal' behavior or is something wrong in my conf? Thx, JD

4 4

quota command broken
by lhecking＠users.sourceforge.net 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

We noticed a big change in the workings of the quota command when moving from RHEL3 to CentOS5. Under RHEL3 (quota-3.10-7), quota -v essentially lists the fs quotas for all users logged into the local machine. Under CentOS5 (quota-3.13-1.2.5.el5), only one user quota is displayed, and while the actual data seems to be correct, the attribution is usually wrong. E.g. $ whoami user1 $ quota -v Disk quotas for user user1 (uid 12345): Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files quota limit grace nfs:/vol/vol2/user2 2596260 4194304 4194304 406132 614400 614400 $ This is for NFS quotas. We don't use local Linux quotas, and I haven't tested them. I don't know how this stuff works under the hood; is it possible that underlying kernel structures have changed, or some kernel config was dropped? I compiled the latest quota tools on both RHEL3 and CentOS5 and found the same behaviour, so the quota tools themselves are most likely not at fault. --------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this message. ---------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Configuring the firewall on CentOS
by Timothy Murphy 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Is there a CentOS equivalent to config-system-firewall in Fedora, allowing specified services to pass through? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

3 3

what is the best way to delete so many queue files?
by MontyRee 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Hello, all. I found that so many unnessary queue files are saved at /var/spool/clientmqueue/ directory. I tested two way to delete these files. 1. # rm -rf /var/spool/clientmqueue/* 2. # cd /var/spool/clientmqueue/ ; find . | xargs rm -fv But this makes a few load of the system and took too much time to delete. What is the best way to delete fast without too much load? Thanks in advance. _________________________________________________________________ 암호를 잃어버렸을 때를 대비하여 미리 암호 확인용 메일 설정하세요! http://im.msn.co.kr/im/main/mainCoverDetail.asp?seq=2251&page=1&BbsCode=bbs…

7 6

Conntrack-tools for CentOS 4.8
by Matt Shields 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Does anyone know where I can get an RPM of Conntrack-tools, libnetfilter_conntrack and libnfnetlink that work with CentOS 4.8? -matt http://www.sysadminvalley.com http://www.beantownhost.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mattboston Stephen Leacock<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/stephen_leacock.html> - "I detest life-insurance agents: they always argue that I shall some day die, which is not so."

2 1

IMAP servers and Sent/Junk folders
by Eugene Vilensky 01 Sep '09

01 Sep '09

Hi, my users were recently moved from a uw-imap on HPUX to dovecot on EL5. Their sent items and folders went from a ~/Sent mbox file (when using SquirrelMail and Apple Mail both) to ~/mail/Sent for SquirrelMail and ~/mail/Sent Messages for other imap clients. I notice I can cat the files together and the only artifact is I end up with multiple "This message is part of the system do not delete" visible to the user's mail client. Is there any advice anyone can give me regarding this or other solution? Thank you! -Eugene Regards, Eugene Vilensky evilensky(a)gmail.com

5 5

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrors and Adjacent country groups
by J.Witvliet＠MINDEF.NL 31 Aug '09

31 Aug '09

Hi -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:41 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrors and Adjacent country groups On 8/25/09, Rainer Duffner <rainer(a)ultra-secure.de> wrote: > Am 26.08.2009 um 00:13 schrieb Lanny Marcus: <snip> >>> Don't you have peering-points somewhere? >>> Sorry for hijacking this thread... >> Rainer: I don't think your reply is OT or hijacking. Good point. I >> suspect that in the EU, there is a lot of peering between countries, >> but here in SA, I don't think so. > > I suspected that. > To illustrate, this: > http://www.caida.org/research/topology/as_core_network/pics/ascore-ipv > 4-ipv6.200903_poster.pdf > is the map I was looking for. Cool. I downloaded that 4.3 MB file. I suspect we could peer with Panama. I believe like Colombia, they are also quite advanced with regard to telecommunications, and it's close. The city I live in (Cali) is actually much closer to Miami, Florida than Los Angeles, California is. And maybe we could peer with Peru, but that's a long way to our South. ---- Afaik it is impossible to deduce from the URL if one node is located nearby or far away. Eventhough as i live in europe, i can register and use a japanese URL. Secondly, i fond out that ISP do funny tricks with routing: My connection to my next-door-neighbour goes via a transcient node in New-York (high latency). Only traceroute can give you a clue if a node is local or not. And even then there is a question of available bandwith.... Hans ______________________________________________________________________ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss