Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

RPMs for vispan , spamstat, phplistadmin
by Linux Advocate 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Guys, i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual and would like to experiment with them. 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan is better fit for reporting) 2. I have googled for their centos rpms but no luck? Any ideas where i can get their rpms? regards, marco.

1 1

Flow-Tools RPM for CentOS 5.3
by Camron W. Fox 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Alle, Does anyone know if there is/where to get an rpm of flow-tools V0.66 or better for CentOS/RHEL 5.3? We've been trying to build from the SRPM @ http://cng.ateneo.net/cng/wyu/software/srpm/flow-tools-0.68-2.src.rpm with no luck. Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cwfox(a)us.fujitsu.com

5 6

Internet squid proxy for banner and add filtering and Nagios
by Dave 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hello, I've got a standalone internet server, it's a vps and i'd like to use it for proxy and add filtering. Since it's directly accessible from the internet i need to lock it down so only designated users can get to it, i'd prefer encrypted transmission of credentials. I've also wanted to get nagios going on this box so it can monitor other services and email/sms when they go down as in an unexpected reboot and don't come back up. That one i definitely want to secure the cgi interface. For both the squid and nagios only authorized users should be able to get to them, and only users on the machine itself, via ssh, ideally should be able to configure them. I'd appreciate any suggestions. Thanks. Dave.

1 0

firewall question
by Jerry Geis 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

My firewall config is below... I am trying to figure out why another machine has access to port 5038 on my machine based on these firewall rules. I thought the reject at the bottom would take care of all other ports? It does not. I have restarted with "server iptables restart" and same thing. I can connect from another machine to my machine on port 5038. How do I prevent this? Jerry --------------------------------- This is my firewall: # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 50 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 51 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp --dport 5353 -d 224.0.0.251 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6540 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6500 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6510 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5060 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5036 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4569 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 1720 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 123 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6544 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT

7 8

so many arp caches why?
by MontyRee 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hello, all. When I execute arp -a -n, there are lots of arp caches like below. Surely, I set netmask and Broadcast without problem and routing table also no problem. System is CentOS release 4.7 i386. I know how to delete the arp cache, but I don't know why .. # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:D1:E7:91:CC inet addr:192.168.195.36 Bcast:192.168.195.63 Mask:255.255.255.192 # route -n 192.168.195.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.195.36 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 # arp -a -n ? (120.88.46.10) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (208.80.195.54) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (125.122.171.33) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.233.26.29) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (111.125.201.75) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.24.196.100) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (60.190.216.31) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (72.232.223.58) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.39.135.185) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (203.171.229.153) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (121.11.81.217) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (61.110.195.18) at 00:11:43:E0:7D:19 [ether] on eth0 ? (61.164.112.5) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.66.79.152) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (221.139.48.11) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.233.26.12) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.137.175.2) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (116.71.174.203) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (72.18.205.157) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.39.136.4) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (202.255.47.226) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.211.52.134) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.61.2.197) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (61.164.151.12) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ............. _________________________________________________________________ 메신저 10살 생일도 축하해 주시고,이벤트도 참여하세요~! http://im.msn.co.kr/im/main/mainCoverDetail.asp?BbsCode=bbs01&Seq=2688

5 9

syslog to remote server
by hce 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hi, I set up the syslog.conf to log local0 and local1 to a remote log server: *.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none;local0.none;local1.none /var/log/messages local0.*;local1.* @192.168.1.2 The messages from local0 worked fine, all sent to the remote log server. But all messages from local1 were still displayed in /var/log/messages despite it has been set to local1.none. Of cause, no local1 messages were sending to the remote server. Could I be missing something here, or could be a bug in 2.6.18-53.el5 which I am running? Thank you. Kind Regards, Jupiter

3 2

Certificate system
by J.Witvliet＠MINDEF.NL 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hi all, Can anybody inform me wether the "RedHat Certificate System" or actually a CentOS equivalent is available for CentOS. Just skimmed on a download site through the RPM's for 5.3 and I couldn't find it. According to their pressrelease, it the code should be gpl, allthough I can't find any rpm for RH, FC or Centos. It seems that this is one of the few CA-packages for large scale deployment of certificates. Only alternative AFAIK is OpenCA, which seems to be hardly maintained... ( binaries on their site are old, and source code yields lots of errors during build..) Defensie/CDC/IVENT/Research en Innovation Centrum Ing J. (Hans) Witvliet Systeembeheer, CAcert-assurer T 0174-539053 mailto:j.witvliet@mindef.nl Coldenhovelaan 1, 3155RC Maasland, kamer A109 ______________________________________________________________________ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

6 6

BIND vulnerability
by Kenneth Porter 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

Slashdot carried this story yesterday on a BIND vulnerability: <http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/29/0028231/New-DoS-Vulnerability-In-All-…> The upstream report: <https://www.isc.org/node/474> Red Hat's Bugzilla: <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514292> >From what I'm reading, if one has an Internet-facing master for a zone, one is vulnerable, even if dynamic DNS isn't being used.

15 26

traceenable for httpd
by Jerry Geis 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

On centos 5.3 x86_64 I can add "traceenable off" to httpd.conf and that works well. however this doesnt seem to work for centos 4.7 i686. Is there a similiar named option on 4.7? Jerry

5 4

Battery condition tools CentOS/Dell
by Kwan Lowe 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

Hello all: Does anyone know of a tool/project that will allow me to read the battery condition (not the charge status) on a Dell laptop battery? Under XP there is a utility that warns that the battery is still holding a charge but that the battery is degraded and should be replaced. Also, not sure if this is possible, but I would like to control how the laptop charges the battery. I tend to have the laptop plugged in most of the time and this constant charging state is apparently very bad for battery lifetime. So a charge/drain cycle is supposedly better. Thanks, Kwan

12 20

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss