Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

OT: Newest kernels much smaller in size
by Lanny Marcus 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

I'm updating my Desktop and curious as to the reason for the huge difference in size, between the oldest kernel, which will be removed, and the newest one that will be installed. Question: Did they remove a lot of things from the kernel or rewrite it much more efficiently? TIA. Installing: kernel i686 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 updates 15 M Removing: kernel i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 installed 40 M

2 2

Execution from ip-up.local
by Ed Warner 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Hi, I'm using Firestarter as my firewall. If I restart the network or my DSL line goes down, I have to manually restart Firestarter. I have sh /etc/firestarter/firestarter.sh stop and then sh /etc/firestarter/firestarter.sh start in my ip-up.local file. I confirmed ip-up.local us being executed by placing an entry in the logs, but it appears firestarter is not or at least not correctly. Does anyone have a suggestion as how I could further troubleshoot this problem? Thanks for your help.

3 2

Current Infighting
by Cory Rainey 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

Most often, I sit here and read the posts because I don't feel I'm qualified yet to be of help to anyone posting in this mailing list. I chose CentOS for my work file server because I had always used RedHat and Fedora and felt comfortable with it. I feel blessed to be part of this community and would be sadly disappointed if it were to self destruct. I appreciate the developers and would not have a clue how they do what they do. I have a great product with support when I need it from the forums and help there when I can as well. That's all I ask. I would gladly donate to the project if there was anything left after paying the bills. I'm sure my boss would as well but, he couldn't even give me a raise this year and is concerned about the future given the economy. Cory

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 54, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:1201 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2009:1201 Important CentOS 5 i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 23:11:10 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1201 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4A7E4C5E.7040802(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1201 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1201.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.2.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.2.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.2.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.2.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.2.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm src: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.2.b09.el5.src.rpm

1 0

ledgersmb installation
by Frank Cox 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

I'm attempting to install ledgersmb on Centos 5 and I'm sure that I've missed something. After doing the initial installation, I get a 404 when I get to the part of the instructions that tell me to go to http://localhost/ledgersmb/admin.pl /etc/httpd/conf.d/ledgersmb.conf contains the following line: Alias /usr/share/ledgersmb WORKING_DIR /usr/share/ledgersmb exists and contains a file named admin.pl /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf contains the following line: Include conf.d/*.conf But when I go to http://localhost/ledgersmb/admin.pl I get this entry in the apache log: 127.0.0.1 - - [08/Aug/2009:15:47:30 -0600] "GET /ledgersmb/admin.pl HTTP/1.1" 40 4 291 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.12) Gecko/2009072711 CentOS/3.0.12-1.el5.centos Firefox/3.0.12" What have I missed here? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

2 2

RPMs for vispan , spamstat, phplistadmin
by Linux Advocate 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Guys, i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual and would like to experiment with them. 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan is better fit for reporting) 2. I have googled for their centos rpms but no luck? Any ideas where i can get their rpms? regards, marco.

1 1

Flow-Tools RPM for CentOS 5.3
by Camron W. Fox 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Alle, Does anyone know if there is/where to get an rpm of flow-tools V0.66 or better for CentOS/RHEL 5.3? We've been trying to build from the SRPM @ http://cng.ateneo.net/cng/wyu/software/srpm/flow-tools-0.68-2.src.rpm with no luck. Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cwfox(a)us.fujitsu.com

5 6

Internet squid proxy for banner and add filtering and Nagios
by Dave 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hello, I've got a standalone internet server, it's a vps and i'd like to use it for proxy and add filtering. Since it's directly accessible from the internet i need to lock it down so only designated users can get to it, i'd prefer encrypted transmission of credentials. I've also wanted to get nagios going on this box so it can monitor other services and email/sms when they go down as in an unexpected reboot and don't come back up. That one i definitely want to secure the cgi interface. For both the squid and nagios only authorized users should be able to get to them, and only users on the machine itself, via ssh, ideally should be able to configure them. I'd appreciate any suggestions. Thanks. Dave.

1 0

firewall question
by Jerry Geis 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

My firewall config is below... I am trying to figure out why another machine has access to port 5038 on my machine based on these firewall rules. I thought the reject at the bottom would take care of all other ports? It does not. I have restarted with "server iptables restart" and same thing. I can connect from another machine to my machine on port 5038. How do I prevent this? Jerry --------------------------------- This is my firewall: # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 50 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 51 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp --dport 5353 -d 224.0.0.251 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6540 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6500 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6510 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5060 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5036 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4569 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 1720 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 123 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6544 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT

7 8

so many arp caches why?
by MontyRee 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hello, all. When I execute arp -a -n, there are lots of arp caches like below. Surely, I set netmask and Broadcast without problem and routing table also no problem. System is CentOS release 4.7 i386. I know how to delete the arp cache, but I don't know why .. # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:D1:E7:91:CC inet addr:192.168.195.36 Bcast:192.168.195.63 Mask:255.255.255.192 # route -n 192.168.195.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.195.36 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 # arp -a -n ? (120.88.46.10) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (208.80.195.54) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (125.122.171.33) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.233.26.29) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (111.125.201.75) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.24.196.100) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (60.190.216.31) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (72.232.223.58) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.39.135.185) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (203.171.229.153) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (121.11.81.217) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (61.110.195.18) at 00:11:43:E0:7D:19 [ether] on eth0 ? (61.164.112.5) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.66.79.152) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (221.139.48.11) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.233.26.12) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.137.175.2) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (116.71.174.203) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (72.18.205.157) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.39.136.4) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (202.255.47.226) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.211.52.134) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.61.2.197) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (61.164.151.12) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ............. _________________________________________________________________ 메신저 10살 생일도 축하해 주시고,이벤트도 참여하세요~! http://im.msn.co.kr/im/main/mainCoverDetail.asp?BbsCode=bbs01&Seq=2688

5 9

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss