Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Upgrade
by Thomas Dukes 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Hello, Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get this is the newest release of Centos. The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss and nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5 is install in Cento 5.2. What's up with that? TIA

12 21

EXT4 root fails for kickstart
by James A. Peltier 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Hi All, For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with my kickstart set for 10G for root at ext3 and it works fine. 10,15 and 20GB with EXT4 all fail. BTW: can't put /boot on it either. Just a heads up for all. ;) -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier(a)sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier MSN : subatomic_spam(a)hotmail.com The point of the HPC scheduler is to keep everyone equally unhappy.

2 1

cups-lpd installation fails
by James A. Peltier 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Hi All, i am getting a cupd-lpd dependancy problem with CentOS 5.3. package cups-lpd is not installed Installing cups-lpd ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile 2 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package cups-lpd.i386 1:1.2.4-11.18.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 for package: cups-lpd --> Finished Dependency Resolution 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 from base has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 is needed by package 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 (base) Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile 2 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package cups-lpd.i386 1:1.2.4-11.18.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 for package: cups-lpd --> Finished Dependency Resolution 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 from base has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 is needed by package 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 (base) Failed to install cups-lpd. Abort! -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier(a)sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier MSN : subatomic_spam(a)hotmail.com The point of the HPC scheduler is to keep everyone equally unhappy.

1 0

upgrade/no upgrade
by rray_1＠comcast.net 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

What is the downside of sticking with 5.2

4 6

acpid events failing after first suspend
by RedShift 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Hello I've configured acpid on my laptop to make the powerbutton hibernate the laptop. I modified /etc/acpid/events/power.conf with the following content: event=PWRF action=/usr/bin/pm-hibernate On the first boot it works like it should, but after the laptop has resumed, the powerbutton doesn't respond anymore. This is an extract from /var/log/acpid when the powerbutton responds: [Wed Apr 1 15:36:46 2009] client connected from 2332[0:0] [Wed Apr 1 15:36:46 2009] 1 client rule loaded [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] received event "button/power PWRF 00000080 00000001" [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] notifying client 2198[68:68] [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] notifying client 2332[0:0] [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] executing action "/usr/bin/pm-hibernate" [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES [Wed Apr 1 18:10:47 2009] END HANDLER MESSAGES [Wed Apr 1 18:10:47 2009] action exited with status 0 [Wed Apr 1 18:10:47 2009] completed event "button/power PWRF 00000080 00000001" After the first resume, nothing like that appears in the logs, like the powerbutton was never pushed. I have acpid version 1.0.4-7.el5 installed, I did not experience this issue on another distro which ships with acpid 1.0.8. Thanks, Best regards, Glenn Matthys

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 50, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:53:03 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090401235303.GA31796(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0326 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0326.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: e043c7a35fa15bf1440c8108ec56f091 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm b8ebb86dc506162ed7acba02b98dda5b kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm c0d63a647563b04a5844efe7771f8a3f kernel-debug-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm c04552e6188e4bef49f5c2030e6ec048 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm a27d27b57417c344ad3b648d9f0f062c kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm 80f8f5a9b1b9fbe5758ecfd351c63b89 kernel-debuginfo-common-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm 4f9cebd8ea89a0430ab23930ea5da47b kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm ad40116878ea62f4bd0adb10780f35fb kernel-doc-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.noarch.rpm 1a7c4488f9c22ffb8a829f1b42da0cca kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i386.rpm 3aa9025aa89f463a67c6d94d131b122a kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm adddc5fcb252983136e2a4af50757ab6 kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm e2d35fc212910983b2d2ac787d622c3b kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm f50b7051031f0f71d677777c3f07c22f kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm e614ba82f0e192d48a9b90f50990f1df kernel-xen-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm 89fbb778f65c7c4a77d983ffa2e1b06f kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm Source: 51ffaeef6c7f2517608993184633a340 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:53:11 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20090401235311.GA31817(a)tantra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0326 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0326.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 2b62ec56108c44ab31421d9597eb12d0 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm 09b298aff5ca7a27f4164262cdf77389 kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm 59be35adf801740f61cbd16251f92092 kernel-debug-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm 81914f2aef92a657f3559c559ec023de kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm ab38b9c518c5d4ae01f5f11039841046 kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm 23b9b2f854d3b157e44d47d6d8235f54 kernel-debuginfo-common-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm ac40a86a8d4f5b47ebc784962d9ac830 kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm ec15faa5e80fe3bf45f17dea680781a4 kernel-doc-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.noarch.rpm cc97bf4ff8dcd39f2f56513dd5143035 kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm ad6b4c90502693c1e1dd8afb29c7066a kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm 6b3e8282d573addcdc72c3d8b6fe9ad5 kernel-xen-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm 40d78b5f33004ab867a4917a6353618c kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 51ffaeef6c7f2517608993184633a340 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 50, Issue 2 **********************************************

1 0

duplicate commands
by Melinda Odom 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Hi, I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c? Is this normal? If not, how do I fix it to make only one command show up? 1 root 15 0 2064 592 512 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.40 init [3] 2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/0] 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/0] 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [watchdog/0] 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/1] 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/1] 7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [watchdog/1] 8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/0] 9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/1] 10 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [khelper] 11 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kthread] 15 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.08 [kblockd/0] 16 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.47 [kblockd/1] 17 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kacpid] 90 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [cqueue/0] 91 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [cqueue/1] 94 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [khubd] 96 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kseriod] 160 root 23 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [pdflush] 161 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.79 [pdflush] 162 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.03 [kswapd0] 163 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/0] 164 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/1] 316 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kpsmoused] 346 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata/0] 347 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata/1] Best Regards, Melinda Odom Design Hosting, Inc. Web Design, Web Hosting, & Ecommerce Solutions 479-471-0891 CST info(a)designhosting.biz http://www.designhosting.biz

3 2

Two sets of Heartbeat HTTPD clusters on same subnet
by Devraj Mukherjee 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Hi all, I am new to Hearbeat so please be kind :) I also posted this on Linux-HA lists with no responses so I posted it here. I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2. Obviously being a broadcast protocol radu-1 and radu-2 get these messages from etk-1 and I can't seem to get radu-1 and radu-2 to cluster (mostly probably because they are not getting the messages from the right nodes). Should I just change the name of the test, if I do that I get heaps of WARNING log messages. Is it possible to have two sets of clusters in the one IP subnet? If yes what do I have to change so these clusters don't send messages to the wrong nodes. heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: process_status_message: bad node [etk-1] in message heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG: Dumping message with 10 fields heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[0] : [t=NS_ackmsg] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[1] : [dest= etk-2] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[2] : [ackseq=1a9601] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[3] : [(1)destuuid=0xdf38de8(37 28)] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[4] : [src= etk-1] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[5] : [(1)srcuuid=0xdf39248(36 27)] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[6] : [hg=499a2a65] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[7] : [ts=49cfb452] heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[8] : [ttl=3] -- "The secret impresses no-one, the trick you use it for is everything" - Alfred Borden (The Prestiege)

5 4

Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
by Karanbir Singh 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: > That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to > 0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if > the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to > do with this. Hmm... the machines seeding at those high 100mbps rates are all hosted in DC's with good peerings all around - and we've spoken with the hosting companies about what these machines are doing! - KB

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
by Nicolas Thierry-Mieg 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: > On a related sidetrack; is there any difference between the proprietary > Nvidia-drivers and the ones from eg rpmforge? Specifically, we use the > proprietary Nvidia drivers on our dozen or so course computers because they > support stereo-3D. When our former *nix-admin set this up years ago, there > weren't anything else to use than the proprietary drivers. Hence my question. the rpmforge driver *is* the proprietary nvidia driver. It's just nicely packaged in an rpm, with dkms for rebuilding when you get a new kernel. It's also not the latest version, which may or may not be a problem for you. It's working well enough for a lot of people, but YMMV.

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss