Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Tomcat with squid username/password
by Harry Sukumar 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

Hi, I am trying to help my friend on this ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Hi, I have an application deployed on tomcat 5.5 with java 1.6.0_07. Occasionally the application needs to connect through our proxy to the outside to collect patches. I've added the following options to the JAVA_OPTS and restarted tomcat. -Dhttp.proxyUser =username -Dhttp.proxyPassword =password -Dhttp.proxyHost=proxy.company.com.au <http://proxy.company.com.au> -Dhttp.proxyPort=3128 Using snoop on the squid proxy I can see the requests, but the username/password combinations are not being sent and the tomcat application receives a 407/DENIED message. Is there a reason the username/password are not being sent? Our squid proxy uses both NTLM and basic authentication. thanks Harry

4 4

using NOPASSWD in sudoers
by Ski Dawg 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

Hello Everyone, I am trying to change our /etc/sudoers (using visudo) to allow 2 commands to be run as root without a password, but it isn't working. Here is the part of the sudoers file that is in question. # User alias specification User_Alias FULLACCESS = doug, scott # members of the FULLACCESS User_Alias may run chown and chmod without a password FULLACCESS ALL = (root) NOPASSWD: /bin/chown, /bin/chmod # members of the FULLACCESS User_Alias may run anything but need a password FULLACCESS ALL=(root) ALL The part for requiring a password works, but not the NOPASSWD line. I have tried changing the order of these lines with no change in behavior. After each change to the sudoers file, I am logging out of the machine and logging back in to make sure that it is properly reading the changes. I have also replaced the list of commands with a Cmnd_Alias, with no change in behavior. Any thoughts or suggestions about what I am missing. -- Doug Registered Linux User #285548 (http://counter.li.org) ---------------------------------------- Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window. -- Steve Wozniak

2 2

Re: [CentOS] Re: Need help with an odd issue I am experiencing
by David Petruzzella 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Scott Silva <ssilva(a)sgvwater.com> Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:22:53 -0700 >This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > I agree but this is a newer ambit modem and if it was the case then mine and the cable guy's laptop would experience the same results. ________________________________________________________________ Sent via the WebMail system at mail.dsli.com

6 12

Multiple Linux instances on the same box - dual/triple/etc boot ?
by kevin kempter 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

Hi List; I have a new dev server. As an independent consultant I want to maximize it's use. Some of my clients use RedHat/CentOS 64 bit, others Redhat/CentOS 32bit, some are even using Fedora and Debian. Here's my thought: I'd like to install each OS/version into it's own space on the disk. I'm thinking all I have to do is install one OS (say CentOS 64bit) and partition say 20% of the disk. Then once the install is done, boot into the latest fedora disk and do the same, etc. Is this correct ? Later I want to add a disk array and allocate a RAID mount point that can be mounted by any of the installed Linux'es when it's active. Is this do-able ? Easily ? Thanks in advance...

8 7

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 43, Issue 9
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 bzip2 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) bzip2 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 bzip2 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) bzip2 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:18:57 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)centos.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 bzip2 - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20080919181857.GC23179(a)centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0893 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0893.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/bzip2-1.0.2-12.EL3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bzip2-devel-1.0.2-12.EL3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bzip2-libs-1.0.2-12.EL3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored

1 0

SNMP and OID/MIB/MRTG
by Bob Hoffman 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

Hi all. I am having an issue and quite frankly would rather not spend the entire next two days learning the entire snmp program. I am hoping someone out there has used MRTG and SNMP to make it work. I have both installed. Single server, polling itself. Question 1- does snmpd have to run as a daemon, or only run once so I can get OID and MIBs from it? Question 2- does anyone know the command in snmp to get the required OID and MIBs that MRTG needs to use? Or at least the name of it? There are a lot of poorly written man pages, but so far all of them require an MIB or OID to use the commands I have read. Question 3- since not going outside of the server, is there any security setting in some snmp config file that makes it only look on my local server and not allow others to use it or hack it? Question 4- all over the internet there are examples in MRTG using all sorts of made up names like 'crazyguy33@servername' and things like that for the cfg file. And alsoin the snmp forum posts, but no one really talks about where this name comes from other than it is assigned to your network device or something. Any help appreciated. I will post the final solution to how to configure snmp and mrtg to work on centos5.2 when I finally figure it out so no one else has to take all week to do so!!! Whoo hoo!!!

16 35

Network issues with CentOS 5.2
by Joey Mendez 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

I am totally new to using CentOS. Linux in Genera really. I have decent experiencing with terminal code for Macs though. Here's the deal my Boss wants us to move more toward linux for some of our basic users. All I was supposed to do was install CentOS 5.2 and Open Office and disburse the machines. Simple enough right. So I did this with no issue. I ran the interface and installed only GNOME and KDE. After installation was complete I activated the eth-0 and had it on DHCP. I connected to the net fine and began downloading open office. I left for the day and came back and I can no longer get back online. The eth-0 wont even activate unless I manually enter a static IP but still can not establish a connection online. I treid reinstalling to no avail. Even built a completely new box and still no avail. I am using CentOS 5.2 i386 DVD. Like I said I am new to this so any guidance would be appreciated to get me into the Linux world. Thank you. -- Jose Mendez Computer Resource Specialist University of California, San Diego

5 9

Strange browser displays with 5.x on Dell GX-260
by Dick Roth 20 Sep '08

20 Sep '08

I had been running CentOS 4.x for quite some time with no problems. Apparently I stubbed my toe when installing CentOS 5 final. Symptoms: various web sites are not properly displayed in Firefox 3.0.1 (or predecessors). In particular, cnn.com and any calls to Google display with a screen full of ascii characters rather than images. When I look at "page info" within Firefox, it shows "quirk" mode rendering rather than "standards compliant" mode. BTW, I'm running the same version (in fact, using the same DVD iso) on my home machine, a Gigabyte system I've cobble up, with no such problem. Any ideas out there? Thanks, Dick -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin 1755

3 6

Problem with Arima HDAMA rev.G with Integrated SiliconImage Sil3114 Serial ATA 4 Ports and 1TB SATA disks. Recomendation for a cheap SATA controller for linux software raid?
by Alexander Georgiev 19 Sep '08

19 Sep '08

Dear Everybody, I am telling you the whole story, perhaps you can give me a better idea. Almost 3 years ago I purchased Arima HDAMA rev. G motherboard with integrated Silicon Image Sil3114 Serial ATA 4 Ports SATA I adapter. ( http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=86 ) . BIOS version is 2.13. My intention is to make a file server, using linux software raid, so I bought 2 new shiny 1TB SATA II disks, and installed them. Unfortunately the system does not boot - hangs in the Sil 3114 BIOS initialization stage. Apparently this is a known problem with Sil3114 and Sil3112: ( http://forums.seagate.com/stx/board/message?board.id=ata_drives&message.id=… ) The Silicon people have issued a BIOS update for this issue, however they explicitly state - only for ADD-IN cards. Perhaps, integrated controlers share the same eeprom chip with the motherboard BIOS, and an attempt to flash it - will render the system unbootable. For integrated controllers - the mainboard producer should provide the update. Apparently the Arima people have sold their business to http://www.flextronics.com/en/default.aspx. The new site is at http://www.flextronics.com/arima/server/Product/ViewDownload.asp?View=HDAMA…. The last BIOS update is from 8/30/2006. And I think this patch well predates the 1TB hard disks and has been issued before SiliconImage's patch: ( http://www.siliconimage.com/support/supportsearchresults.aspx?pid=28&cid=15… ) . So I am not willing to risk a BIOS update and I have decided to spend additional cash on a cheap but fast 4 port SATA II controller and use it with Centos 5.2. Where I reside, the following two have caught my attention: ADAPTEC SATA RAID 1420SA Serial ATA-150/Serial ATA II-300 PCI-X 4ch for 120 USD ( http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sata/entry/AAR-1… ) and PROMISE FastTrak TX4300 Serial ATA II-300 PCI 4ch for 160 USD ( http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?segment=RAID%200/1%20… ) Do you have any experience any of these 2 adapters, operating as plain SATA controllers, under linux software raid? Which one would you recommend? Best regards, Alex

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 43, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 19 Sep '08

19 Sep '08

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 bzip2 Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 bzip2 Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:02:05 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 bzip2 Update To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <48D26D6D.5050309(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0893 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0893.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: bzip2-1.0.2-14.el4_7.x86_64.rpm bzip2-devel-1.0.2-14.el4_7.i386.rpm bzip2-devel-1.0.2-14.el4_7.x86_64.rpm bzip2-libs-1.0.2-14.el4_7.i386.rpm bzip2-libs-1.0.2-14.el4_7.x86_64.rpm src: bzip2-1.0.2-14.el4_7.src.rpm

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss