Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

RE: [CentOS] centos 5.1 i386 on a 1GIG flash
by Plant, Dean 29 May '08

29 May '08

Jerry Geis wrote: > I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos > for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting > centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing > packages after install to attain the small size. > > however, I am getting blocked at the install page about not enough > room > to install. > All I have selected is the base package. nothing else. > > Is there a way to install "less thank" base... I tried to option off > items in the base package > but the last message I got was about 1044 was my packages size... > > Anyone have suggestions or have tried to install on a small device. > THanks, > > Jerry Create a kickstart file with the packages removed as shown in the appendix on their web page. Dean

1 0

CentOS Boot-Up Progress Bar Show Details Menu is Not Working
by Balaji 29 May '08

29 May '08

Dear All, I have Installed CentOS 4.4 Linux and Linux Boot-Up Progress bar "Show Details" Menu when i enable the Menu it shows the start-up services details. Then i have done some changes in Linux but i am forgotten the changes. After some changes the Linux Boot-Up Progress bar "Show Details" Menu when i enable the Menu it will not shows the start-up services details. I tried to google-out the problem in vain Any clues as to whats the problem and the remedy? Regards -S.Balaji

2 1

centos 5 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel and ipsec
by Joe Pruett 29 May '08

29 May '08

i had previously been having issues with automount being slow with this new kernel and i tracked it down to dns delays which were being caused by ipsec not working. i have spent a few hours poking around and ipsec seems quite broken with this new kernel. esp packets go in and out just fine, but when i look at ip xfrm stats on the machine with the new kernel, i see that for input packets, the ah layer is being processed just fine, but the esp layer is showing 0 bytes/packets and no errors. i can't find any errors or other indications of what is going on. is anyone else running a standard ipsec tunnel (using the standard ifcfg method for creating the tunnel) under this new kernel? i know that a new 5.2 kernel should be coming soon, but i worry that whatever broke this version may happen there as well.

3 3

centos 5.1 i386 on a 1GIG flash
by Jerry Geis 29 May '08

29 May '08

I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing packages after install to attain the small size. however, I am getting blocked at the install page about not enough room to install. All I have selected is the base package. nothing else. Is there a way to install "less thank" base... I tried to option off items in the base package but the last message I got was about 1044 was my packages size... Anyone have suggestions or have tried to install on a small device. THanks, Jerry

5 4

Adding new drivers to the pxeboot initrd/kernel
by Drew Weaver 28 May '08

28 May '08

Does anyone have a howto or documentation on how to add new drivers to the pxeboot initrd/kernel? It appears that although some newer dells (t300) have Broadcom NetXtreme IIs in them, 4.6 won't recognize them for some reason (possibly because they're dual port?) -Drew

3 4

raw device change back to root after reboot
by mcclnx mcc 28 May '08

28 May '08

We are setup new DELL 6800 server fro Informix database. We create "raw" partitions and change "raw" partitions owner to "informix:informix". After reboot owner change back to "root". we don't have problem on CENTOS 3.X, but this problem happen on CENTOS 4.6. I double check "SELINUX" is "disable". does anyone know why it work on 3.X, but NOT on 4.6? do I need modify /etc/udev/permissions.d/50-udev.permissions? if "yes", anyone have sample? Thanks. 付費才容量無上限？Yahoo!奇摩電子信箱2.0免費給你，信件永遠不必刪！ - 馬上體驗！

2 1

Question about delay pools
by Sergio Belkin 28 May '08

28 May '08

Hi, I configured delay pools on squid. I get the following from squidclient: Delay pools configured: 2 Pool: 1 Class: 1 Aggregate: Disabled. Pool: 2 Class: 1 Aggregate: Max: 187500 Restore: 187500 Current: -6 Memory Used: 624 bytes End of Output What does mean Current with a negative value? Thanks in advance -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin -

1 0

Bind Help
by Joseph L. Casale 28 May '08

28 May '08

How does one include a view in another? I have a view which matches one client that I also want to be able to see the view right after, but it stops at its first match. Thanks! jlc

2 4

Problem accessing to Windows Terminal Server in load balancing.
by ArcosCom Linux User 28 May '08

28 May '08

Hi guys, I have this configuration: LAN -- LINUX BRIDGE -- LINUX BRIDGE -- TS The linux's bridges are for wifi purposes (2 centos machines) and is working fine. The problem I have is that the TS are 3 windows TS in load balancing configuration. There is 1 IP for general purposes and every TS has its own IP. For example, the configuration is: 192.168.0.1/24 TS1 192.168.0.2/24 TS2 192.168.0.3/24 TS3 192.168.0.10/24 (TS server IP for load balancing) The problem I encountered is that every PC into the LAN has access from the LAN to every TS (tested with ping), but them have no access to the IP for load balancing. I observed that all TSn IP's has their ARP entry in the ARP table, but the IP for load balancing not. How can I solve this problem at the bridge level? I think that there is something that the bridges are filtering and perhaps is because the TS load balancing software uses various "virtual macs" for the load balancing IP. Perhaps I must change any /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/<dev>/ file to bypass this filter, I'm thinking in "arp_ignore", put a "1" into it, but is a production environment and I don't want to loss the access to the devices. Any help?

2 3

How to move my MBR
by Scott Moseman 28 May '08

28 May '08

I removed an ATA drive (/home) for a new SATA and my system would not boot. I'm guessing that it put the MBR on that drive instead of the drive that holds the / partition. What's the best way confirm where the MBR resides and, after I verify that's my problem, how I can move (or make a copy) onto a different drive? Thanks, Scott

4 9

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss