Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 35, Issue 12
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 20 Jan '08

20 Jan '08

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0031 Important CentOS 5 i386 xorg-x11-server Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2008:0031 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 xorg-x11-server Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:46:28 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0031 Important CentOS 5 i386 xorg-x11-server Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20080120034628.GA29288(a)base.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0031 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0031.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 8a2d0755db05212945471d193b02f2e4 xorg-x11-server-sdk-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.i386.rpm 660b3f8fdbd803cec4b4c4e74ecf0272 xorg-x11-server-Xdmx-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.i386.rpm 80503fa803b0847f7bd31e5acf442d6c xorg-x11-server-Xephyr-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.i386.rpm 6e0c4ee818e27c1aea4255d5cb38c6ca xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.i386.rpm 57223ade728fdf76f087d60efa9ec7c1 xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.i386.rpm e65abd2eec38df640548a43855e3bd98 xorg-x11-server-Xvfb-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.i386.rpm Source: b89d6f73cd1202a3eb436d423bc301d5 xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.src.rpm [Updated 19th January 2008] The original packages distributed with this errata had a bug which could cause some X applications to fail on 32-bit platforms. We have updated the packages to correct this bug. -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:46:28 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0031 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 xorg-x11-server Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20080120034628.GA29306(a)base.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0031 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0031.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 716074be861e1c34b054f63a059b6e6a xorg-x11-server-sdk-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.x86_64.rpm b86d737b40bd8b97b2dff9e3747b7db2 xorg-x11-server-Xdmx-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.x86_64.rpm 12f29928189685f170637b8a61ed6497 xorg-x11-server-Xephyr-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.x86_64.rpm ecc5f39d960418520e4cdd46cb55598c xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.x86_64.rpm a562a8fb05f65bcac043f48332e81ed8 xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.x86_64.rpm aff7a971ddce46079b402af8939e2d7b xorg-x11-server-Xvfb-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.x86_64.rpm Source: b89d6f73cd1202a3eb436d423bc301d5 xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.src.rpm [Updated 19th January 2008] The original packages distributed with this errata had a bug which could cause some X applications to fail on 32-bit platforms. We have updated the packages to correct this bug. -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 35, Issue 12 ***********************************************

1 0

5-in-1 Card Reader in Acer Extensa 5220
by Olaf Mueller 20 Jan '08

20 Jan '08

Hello, I have installed CentOS 5 (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5) on my new Acer Extensa 5220 notebook and everything seems to work fine except of the following: 1) Display is ok, but could maybe be better? The driver is set to 'vesa' but should be 'intel', in my opinion. But 'intel' isn't working in xorg.conf. 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) 2) The 5-in-1 Card Reader isn't working. 0f:06.2 Mass storage controller: Texas Instruments 5-in-1 Multimedia Card Reader (SD/MMC/MS/MS PRO/xD) 0f:06.3 Generic system peripheral [0805]: Texas Instruments PCIxx12 SDA Standard Compliant SD Host Controller 3) The wlan card isn't detected, but that's no problem. I will buy a ralink rt61 based pcmcia card which works great under my toshiba tecra notebook with CentOS 5. 04:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM94311MCG wlan mini-PCI (rev 01) 4) Suspend; not tested this yet So the only real problem is 2). Is there a possibility to get this 5-in-1 Card Reader working under CentOS 5? Thank you very much! regards Olaf

1 2

service jexec
by jarmo 20 Jan '08

20 Jan '08

Started looking what services I actually having on and found this "jexec". Tried to google it and found some info, but do not understand its meaninig. Is it necessary and what does it do? Please, short explanation for "dummie" :D Jarmo

2 1

Do we have any Zimbra users on the list?
by Johnny Hughes 20 Jan '08

20 Jan '08

All, Here is a request for Zimbra to provide official CentOS support: http://bugzilla.zimbra.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23487 Here is a poll that might help them see how many CentOS Customers they REALLY have: http://www.zimbra.com/forums/users/14136-foss-edition-most-popular-linux-di… I am not asking for anyone to do anything mean, or to say anything untrue, in fact, please don't. I am asking that if you use Zimbra on CentOS (either the Free Version or the Network Version) that you let them know that you are. If you would pay for Official support, let them know that too. Thanks, Johnny Hughes

9 13

ICMP: 62.x.x.x: Source Route Failed
by ann kok 20 Jan '08

20 Jan '08

Hi all i got the ICMP: 62.x.x.x: Source Route Failed in the /var/log/message What is it? Thank you ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

2 1

yum install foobar, silently ignore the unknown foobar package -> Nothing to do
by Alain Spineux 20 Jan '08

20 Jan '08

# yum install foobar Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do Here is the output of my centos 4 # yum install foobar Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments No Match for argument: foobar <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< This is missing in centos5 Nothing to do any idea -- Alain Spineux aspineux gmail com May the sources be with you

2 3

Urgent: Major bug in latest X.Org Update for CentOs 5
by Ioannis Vranos 19 Jan '08

19 Jan '08

OS: CentOS 5.1 x86. Hi, after applying the latest X.Org updates, applications have stopped running with an error message: "The program 'multiget' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'. (Details: serial 214 error_code 11 request_code 146 minor_code 5) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)" Just checked the Red Hat errata link: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0031.html and it says: "[Updated 18th January 2008] The original packages distributed with this errata had a bug which could cause some X applications to fail on 32-bit platforms. We have updated the packages to correct this bug". Please fix ASAP!!! Ioannis (John)

2 1

You can't get there from here
by Miark 19 Jan '08

19 Jan '08

Having been accomodating about it in the past, the technical geniuses at Comcast have permanently blocked port 25, separating me (at my home office) from my employer's e-mail server. What can be done on the server side to keep Postfix listening on 25 _and_ accept my connections on some other port? Is there a Postfix solution? iptables maybe? Miark

9 11

VDQ : Triple Boot Advice?
by Beartooth Testbedder 19 Jan '08

19 Jan '08

Let me set up a Very Dumb Question (VDQ). My apologies in advance for repeating much of this to those who have been of such vast help getting me this far. (Followup to: is set as gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general) I have a testbed machine which currently has /dev/hda1 - 6, according to qtparted, with sizes 102 MB, 14 GB, 13 GB, 13 GB, 12 GB, and 14 MB respectively (rounded to nearest whole MB or GB). It actually boots only Ubuntu, which is on hda5. hda1 is /boot, and hda6 is swap. I had CentOS alone on the whole hard drive, and found that Ubuntu 6.06 couldn't keep it, by any means I could find, using the GUI installer. (Dunno if that's anaconda or something else.) Getting Ubuntu 6.06-alternate instead, I tried to stumble and stagger through text-install and manual partitioning, both for the first time -- and, not surprisingly, eventually did get Ubuntu installed, only at the price of hosing CentOS. (If I were doing it all over, perhaps I should do the partitioning first and separately, with knoppix or gparted, or with qtparted if that has a live cd. Maybe I should Dban the whole shebang, and repartition first anyway ...) After much help, I concluded that that release of Ubuntu had also been a mistake : getting my must-have apps onto it cost lots of grief, and the most essential, Alpine 1.0, never made it at all. That means I can't yet give Ubuntu a fair test as to filling my needs. So now I want to install CentOS 5.1 again, Ubuntu 7.10, and Fedora 8. The VDQ comes in three parts. First, the sequence : I'd prefer to put the new Ubuntu onto one of the 13 GB partitions, and make it end up second in boot sequence. I *think* I'll be safer to install it first in time, and with the GUI .iso, *not* with the text-install, which I lack the savvy to use. Can I do that? Or does installing it first in time force me to use the first free partition? (If it does, but lets me keep the rest of the setup, I'd rather live with it than tackle the text-install again, let alone re-partition.) Second, also about the sequence : given that all I've ever really run has been RedHat or Fedora (but I've been doing that since RH7), will I be any better off installing one of them before the other? Third, does anyone know of an example somewhere of a grub.conf, for a machine running three linuces, which I can manage to clone once I do get all three installed? I'm assuming that each OS will have a way of booting itself once I get to it, and that the first and hardest job will be instructing grub how to get to each, in a way that enables it to update for itself whenever any of the three gets a fresh kernel on some update. Is that right? My experience in the past has been that grub is everywhere dense, as the mathematicians say. Not in this life will I get my head far enough around it to have a real grasp of how to configure it -- not and get it right. Man grub and its ilk wear out my fingernails as I try to climb the walls. But I can copy and vary, or follow a recipe if it's explicit enough. -- Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck, Double Retiree, Not Quite Clueless Linux Power User : F8, C5.1, U6.06; I have precious (very precious) little idea where up is.

3 3

Possibly OT: FreeNX and Gnome Language
by Alex White 19 Jan '08

19 Jan '08

If this is too far off topic please let me know and I'll send this to the Gnome list or something. Today I recently had a thai friend want to experience linux. Their limitation is language of course. I set up an account for my friend and had them log in after changing through GDM their language preferences to Thai. The Thai language shows up for me when I log in as the user on the machine. I read several posts notably the following: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/freenx-knx/2006-August/003967.html I attempted to accomplish this with those instructions and end up with a whole lot of fail. I assume I am misunderstanding something very basic because the user still is presented with an English desktop when they login through nx. I also tried the following trick of editing their ~/.dmrc to provide the language environment, but unless you login through gdm (as I read from google searches) this file is skipped. Has anyone encountered this and come up with a solution? Or is there a way to refine my google search in some way to provide better information for me? I appreciate any help anyone can provide. Sincerely -- ethericalzen(a)gmail.com Life is a prison, death is a release

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss