Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

5 participants
34752 discussions

Certbot error CentOS 7.5
by Jerry Geis 13 Jul '18

13 Jul '18

Hi All - I am running CentOS 7.5 and trying to use certbot. I am getting an error 403 forbidden on the /.well-known/acme-challenge/-CG_gSckofY5ln7TdMvoanDI1_FBRh8otQkyB0hxmoo Some searching indicated permission problems... I also noticed that the /var/www/html directory does not even have the .well-known directory in it. The /var/www/html directory was root:root I changed it to root:apache and still same error. ls -l /var/www/ total 0 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Jun 27 09:49 cgi-bin drwxr-xr-x. 6 root apache 214 Jun 27 09:49 html Anyone ran into this ? Got a fix? Thanks, Jerry

4 3

Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
by Matthew Phelps 13 Jul '18

13 Jul '18

Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the following library failures in 'ldd' output: > ldd libwidevinecdm.so ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps(a)cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu

3 5

C7, ipmi, NIC2, still fighting
by mark 13 Jul '18

13 Jul '18

This is that system with the missing management port, and I'm still fighting it. Everything *looks* right: 3: enp6s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:25:90:0a:42:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.100/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global enp6s0 ip route 192.168.0.0/24 dev enp6s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.100 and ipmitool lan print IP Address Source : Static Address IP Address : 192.168.0.132 Subnet Mask : 255.255.255.0 MAC Address : 00:25:90:0a:42:92 <...> Default Gateway IP : 192.168.0.100 Default Gateway MAC : 00:25:90:0a:42:87 I can ping 192.168.0.1... yet I'm getting martians on the real network. There's no firewall on enp6s0. Any clues as to what I'm missing? mark "No illudium Q-36 space modulators, please"

3 4

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
by Sean 12 Jul '18

12 Jul '18

Thanks for the idea, I'm not in a hurry and don't have a desire to hand-jam upstream versions of firefox onto desktops. I just need to track progress on the patch release and report an ETA to our cyber security team. I just figured CentOS had a fancy devops CI/CD system somewhere that I could keep tabs on to watch what's going on as patches get built, tested and published. Seems like all the cool kids are doing that kind of stuff these days. > From: Alice Wonder <alice(a)domblogger.net> > To: centos(a)centos.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:31:20 -0700 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress? > On 07/02/2018 06:57 AM, Sean wrote: > > Is there a way to track CentOS's progress on RHSA-2018-2113? > > > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2113 > > > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS(a)centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > This is what I do and it works well, script run as root after > downloading compiled tarball from upstream. > > ------ > #!/bin/bash > > TMP=`mktemp -d /tmp/ff.XXXXXXXX` > mv $1 ${TMP}/ > > pushd ${TMP} > > FFOX=`echo $1 |sed -e s?"\.tar\.bz2"?""?` > > tar -jxf ${1} > > chown -R root:root firefox > > mv firefox /usr/local/${FFOX} > > popd > > pushd /usr/local > > rm -f firefox && ln -s ${FFOX} firefox > > popd > > rm -rf ${TMP} > --------- > > $1 is the FireFox downloaded from upstream (compiled) > > Installing it as root means I am safe from malware over-writing bits of > it, but I do have to manually download. > > /usr/local/firefox/firefox then starts it - and old versions are > preserved in case something breaks (I just change which one the > /usr/local/firefox link points to - though I almost never have to revert) > > It's not RPM but there are too many advantages to newer FireFox for me > to wait. >

3 11

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 161, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 12 Jul '18

12 Jul '18

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2018:2113 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:01:41 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2113 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20180711230141.GA18411(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2113 Critical Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2113 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: b85d21245010b6238614b5d04f3e746481beb6add573def2c44222fcdbf8a334 firefox-60.1.0-4.el7.centos.i686.rpm 1e3afa2480174fab6503c59af056a623ed2617c2beb5b320325bba2e0a453244 firefox-60.1.0-4.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: df0480c582dbd9a58ec9767d81602369e030b27effda90133c07e2f1d3123fc5 firefox-60.1.0-4.el7.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 161, Issue 2 ***********************************************

1 0

Where can I find the 6.10 centos-release srpm?
by me＠tdiehl.org 11 Jul '18

11 Jul '18

Hi, Where can I find the srpm for centos-release-6-10.el6.centos.12.3.x86_64? I looked in vault and it is not there. Regards, -- Tom me(a)tdiehl.org

6 11

Semi-OT: LSI raid card sorta....
by mark 11 Jul '18

11 Jul '18

I've got a box running C7, just updated (yesterday). It had an onboard RAID controller, and an HBA. I just installed a new, additional RAID card, all LSI. MegaCli64 only sees one controller. I can't seem to find the magic to see the others. I *know* the new card is a MegaRAID - the box it came in says so. The system sees it 1:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS1078 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS (rev 04) 42:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS-3 3108 [Invader] (rev 02) 43:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS3008 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-3 (rev 02) I've connected a RAID box that we had to it. I'm trying to import the foreign configuration and bring it online. I really can't reboot the system for (literally) another month (the maintenance window); I saw the firmware interface, but for Reasons, couldn't do it then, and figured I'd be able to to it with MegaCli64, but so far, nope. -AdpAllinfo gets only one. Clues? mark

2 3

FYI: Useful to know on pdf printing
by mark 11 Jul '18

11 Jul '18

This is just an FYI, folks. We've got this large poster printer. We had some, er, environmental issues, let us say, and first I had to recreate the .ppd (HP "doesn't support printing from Linux, and the one a former coworker extracted from the Mac package... was for a 23", not this 44"). Then... I was trying to print from a 6.9 box. I hadn't rebuilt the box as C 7, because until the Incident, I'd been using acroread, so I was looking to see if something else would print correctly. Using evince in 6.9, 100% of the time, the printer's web page would tell me it was receiving, then the job would vanish, and the logs on the Linux side would tell me broken pipe. I did, however, print a test page from cups with no problem. So, yesterday, I updated to6.10, and then installed okular... and it printed perfectly, with no issues. Apparently, evince has some issue, either printing a .pdf, or there's something in my hacked .ppd that makes it gag, but okular is happy with. Just thought I'd let y'all know, so you could push it onto the stack, available if you run into this issue. mark

1 0

Solarflare SFC9000 direct connection
by lejeczek 10 Jul '18

10 Jul '18

hi guys I wonder if any of you might be using SFN6122F-R7 SFP+ (SFC9000, same firmware everywhere, Centos 7.5 too. I'm trying poor man's setup to get the servers onto 10GbE network. Setup is such that three Dell R815 are connected to each other, each has one Solarflare(SFP ports) and each Solarflare is set as net-team(both ports on a card are net-team device) with runner in broadcast mode. And it all seems to work, they ping each other, iperf okey. The problem, big problem is that when traffic start to flow between all three servers simultaneously, with rsync for example, then!! one box gets shoot in the head, hard reset, gone. Every time same one box. Sure there are some bits that run on that one box that are not on the other two. Now, I know you would normally put it via a switch, but like I said: poor man's config, but you would not expect system to die like this neither, right? many thanks, L.

2 2

shellinabox
by lejeczek 10 Jul '18

10 Jul '18

hi guys, shellinabox, do you use it? I in pretty vanilla setup get selinux denials and cannot login. Selinux says: #============= unconfined_service_t ============== #!!!! The file '/usr/bin/bash' is mislabeled on your system. #!!!! Fix with $ restorecon -R -v /usr/bin/bash allow unconfined_service_t unconfined_t:process transition; but that does not seem right to me, to allow such a transition, right? many thanks, L.

3 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss