Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2007:0044 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 bind - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2007:0044 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 bind - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2007:0044-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 bind security update (John Newbigin) 4. CESA-2007:0044 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 bind - security update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2007:0044 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 bind - security update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:49:08 +0100 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0044 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 bind - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20070206214908.GA17467(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0044 bind security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0044.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-20.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-20.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-20.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-20.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-20.EL3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/bind-9.2.4-20.EL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update bind Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

DVD for x64
by Mário Gamito 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Hi, Does anyone knows of a site that has the x64 CentOS DVD for download ? Or is it just bittorrent ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito

3 2

LDAP con ppolicy
by Alexander Lopez 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Hola a todos... Compile openLDAP y habilite --enable-overlays como modulos.. Entonces ppolicy.la se creo.. pero cuando en el archivo de configuracion de ldap coloco lo siguiente funciona: # Load dynamic backend modules: modulepath /usr/local/libexec/openldap moduleload ppolicy.la # password policy overlay ppolicy ppolicy_default "cn=Standard Policy,ou=Policies,dc=jovenesdemocracia,dc=org" Y cuando trato de levantar me sale el siguiente error: overlay "ppolicy" not found Y cuando comento overlay ppolicy y levanto de nuevo ldap me funciona bien.. Entonce mi pregunta es si ppolicy esta como modulo no hay necesidad de colocar en el archivo de configuracion el parametro overlay ppolicy. Espero sus comentarios...

1 0

Centos VPS providers in the European Union?
by M. Fioretti 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Hello, I may need to set up soon a Linux VPS, to be used almost exclusively for handling email (as in "2GB of disk space, 2GB/month of bandwidth would be surely enough") with a fully customized postfix/procmail/dovecot setup. I'd prefer to use Centos, which I already use and know. One reason why I'm asking this here is that I'd really like to be sure, before I go for it, that the provider not only _offers_ Centos VPS but also actually _know_ Centos, so they can help if some problems with their setup comes up. Now, for several reasons I am only interested in companies which are 100% based in the European Union (both the legal entity and the datacenter) _and_ speak English with their customers, thanks. Another requirement is that it has to be a provider which: * either doesn't host anonymizers, adult content and warez altogether, or * if it does, it does it on a completely different set of IP addresses the reason is exclusively technical, ie availability: I have already seen where I work the webmail of several, absolutely family-safe websites blocked because, as it turns out, they sit on the same IP address or IP block used by adult/warez sites. It may be stupid, but that's the way it is, and I can't control it. Do you know any good and reliable provider with this profile? Any feedback is welcome, either on list or privately. Thanks, Marco -- The right way to make everybody love Free Standards and Free Software: http://digifreedom.net/node/73

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Centos VPS providers in the European Union?
by amitgspace-999999＠yahoo.co.in 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Hi, Linode.com is good VPS solution although not europian With regards, Amit Gupta Bangalore, India Yahoo messenger: amitguptainn Skype: amitguptainn Mobile:9900696870 (Bangalore), 9818558121(Delhi) When 9900696870 is not reachable, call at 9818558121 ------------------------------------------------------ Help disabled in his commutation ------------------------------------------------------ ----- Original Message ---- From: M. Fioretti <mfioretti(a)mclink.it> To: centos(a)centos.org Sent: Wednesday, 7 February, 2007 7:42:50 PM Subject: [CentOS] Centos VPS providers in the European Union? Hello, I may need to set up soon a Linux VPS, to be used almost exclusively for handling email (as in "2GB of disk space, 2GB/month of bandwidth would be surely enough") with a fully customized postfix/procmail/dovecot setup. I'd prefer to use Centos, which I already use and know. One reason why I'm asking this here is that I'd really like to be sure, before I go for it, that the provider not only _offers_ Centos VPS but also actually _know_ Centos, so they can help if some problems with their setup comes up. Now, for several reasons I am only interested in companies which are 100% based in the European Union (both the legal entity and the datacenter) _and_ speak English with their customers, thanks. Another requirement is that it has to be a provider which: * either doesn't host anonymizers, adult content and warez altogether, or * if it does, it does it on a completely different set of IP addresses the reason is exclusively technical, ie availability: I have already seen where I work the webmail of several, absolutely family-safe websites blocked because, as it turns out, they sit on the same IP address or IP block used by adult/warez sites. It may be stupid, but that's the way it is, and I can't control it. Do you know any good and reliable provider with this profile? Any feedback is welcome, either on list or privately. Thanks, Marco -- The right way to make everybody love Free Standards and Free Software: http://digifreedom.net/node/73 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos __________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/

1 0

RE: [CentOS] Problem with 2.6.11.4 kernel and e1000 driver - Correction
by Mark Hull-Richter 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Actually, here is what shows up in the log, regardless of whether the driver is built-in or loaded as a module: Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_source_route = 0 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: kernel.sysrq = 0 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: kernel.core_uses_pid = 1 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Setting network parameters: succeeded Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Bringing up loopback interface: succeeded Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 ifup: Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring. Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Bringing up interface eth0: failed Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 ifup: Device eth1 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring. Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Bringing up interface eth1: failed It has been suggested that I edit out the HWADDR= contents from the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts file and restart the network. Any other/further input? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:35 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Problem with 2.6.11.4 kernel and e1000 driver I get the following results when I try to load the 2.6.11.4 kernel with an Intel e1000 driver (the one that comes in the kernel source): 1) If I build it into the kernel, nothing shows up at all. 2) If I build it as a loadable module, I get errors on eth0 and eth1 that the MAC address is different than expected, and it ignores the controller. What's up with this? Thanks. mhr _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

3 2

RE: [CentOS] Problem with 2.6.11.4 kernel and e1000 driver -Correction
by Mark Hull-Richter 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

1) I'm actually not building a custom kernel per se, just one from the standard 2.6.11.4 with our configuration. I may be adding a custom driver, but unless I can get the standard kernel to boot,... 2) I have been told that after 2.6.11.4, support for the Infiniband driver is dropped, and we need that. If this is not the case, I would be delighted to know that and proceed accordingly. I'm not sure, but I believe that CentOS version 5 will not happen soon enough for what we need. Thanks. mhr -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:04 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with 2.6.11.4 kernel and e1000 driver -Correction On 2/6/07, Mark Hull-Richter <mhull-richter(a)datallegro.com> wrote: > Any other/further input? Yes, though not directly related to your issue. 1. Why build a custom kernel instead of sticking with the distro provided one? 2. If you feel that you absolutely have to build a custom kernel, why build such an old one? -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

Centos 4.4 NFSv4
by Vasiliy Boulytchev 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Ladies and Gents, Having a rough time with nfsv4... Trying to mount via NFS v4 to get ACL support... I am getting this when i try to mount: NFS mount version 4 s not supported. here are my fstab options: nfs rw,hard,intr,exec,acl,mountvers=4 Nfs clients installed: nfs-utils-1.0.6-70.EL4 nfs-utils-lib-1.0.6-3 system-config-nfs-1.2.8-1 I presume I need to upgrade... how would I go about doing so? The contrib repos are enabled. THANKS FOR YOUR HELP -- Vasiliy Boulytchev vasiliy(a)linuxspecial.com

2 3

SLI 4 monitor DELL workstation and CentOS
by Charles Gregg 07 Feb '07

07 Feb '07

Anyone doing Centos on SLI 4 monitor workstation? I am currently building a workstation out with Dell for this. I hope to use CentOS (x86_64) on it. Any advice or words of wisdom would be GREAT! This will be my first attempt at SLI. I have done 4 screens but AGP/PCI combos only. This one we need hardcore 3D ability on all of them. I would like to use CentOS 4.2, will atleast try it first then 4.4. Any info will be apreaciated. Once ordered I will post my success or horror story of getting CentOS going on it. Thanks, Charles Gregg This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original.

1 0

Increasing existing partition and LVM size
by Alfred von Campe 06 Feb '07

06 Feb '07

I have a disk on which CentOS is installed and running. The disk partitions look like this: Disk /dev/sda: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 5221 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux /dev/sda2 14 1044 8281507+ 8e Linux LVM What I would like to do is increase the size of the second partition to be the entire disk, and then grow the logical volume(s) and the file systems on it. BTW, this is all on a VMware virtual disk, so I really can't screw things up, as I have a copy of the VMDK files and can start over again (and again, and again...). The disk was originally 8GB, and I just resized it with vmware-vdiskmanager. I have tried to use parted to resize the partition, but I get the message "Error: Could not detect file system.", and I can't find a way to resize the partition with fdisk and sfdisk. Am I missing something obvious or is this not doable? Thanks, Alfred

4 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss