Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

5 participants
34752 discussions

Deleted my PATH
by Niels Przybilla 11 Jun '06

11 Jun '06

Hi, I have been logged in as root, and it seems to me that i destroyed all my PATh Variables. How can I restore them ? Thnaks for your help and best regards Niels

2 1

PXE booting HP BL25p - Smart Array extended bios data area problem
by Miskell, Craig 11 Jun '06

11 Jun '06

Hi, I recently took delivery of a bunch of HP BL25p blades to add to my collection. I am attempting to install Centos4 x86_64 using PXE - the initial PXE DHCP stuff works, and the kernel and initrd are downloaded, but the server then immediately clears the screen and displays: "1706-Smart Array Controller Extended BIOS Data Area Memory Corrupted Array Controller Interrupt 14h BIOS Cannot Continue System Halted" It's pretty obvious what the problem probably is (the kernel nukes some bit of memory that it shouldn't, or that the smart array hasn't properly marked as reserved), but I don't know what to do to fix it. I have also tried: 1) The i386 kernel and initrd images 2) The RedHat AS4 kernel/initrd images 3) The Centos3 i386 kernel and initrd images 4) Downgrading the System ROM BIOS and Smart Array BIOS (as shipped it had the latest versions) to versions up to a year old. 5) Playing with memmap to exclude mem from 610-640K from being used by the kernel. Booting from CD works, but is suboptimal (I have to type the kernel kickstart options, and I don't want to have to do that 16 times, plus I want easy repeatability in future). Google has been fairly silent on the issue. Does anyone have any suggestions for what else I could try/prod/poke? Thanks, Craig Miskell, Technical Support, AgResearch Invermay 03 489-9279 "The two rules for success: 1. Don't tell people everything you know." - Anon. Please accept my abject apologies for the awful mess of a legal disclaimer which follows. Not my choice ;-( ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. =======================================================================

3 7

Old (really old) programs under CentOS.
by Lamar Owen 11 Jun '06

11 Jun '06

Ok, I have a small dilemma, and I'm hoping someone here has had to do this before. I have at a site (not PARI) a server running some mission critical software that was written in 1997 for libc5, under AOLserver 2.3. No, source code is not available for that version of AOLserver (it wasn't open-sourced until version 3.0, and the API changed rather dramatically at that point), not that it would help any, as gcc has undergone so many changes since RH5 that a recompile would be very difficult. The software is currently running on Redhat 5.2 (don't laugh; it's got a 2,716-day uptime right now! (yes, that's over 7 years!)) with the libc5 libs loaded. The server hardware is just about ready to fly apart, and I need to see about running this on more modern hardware. Of course, they already have bought the replacement server, a Dell PowerEdge 1850. No way RH 5.2 is going to load on a PE1850 with the megaraid PERC 4e/Si. Now, I've thought about a couple of possibilities: 1.) QEMU or VMware or similar running a RH5.2 instance under CentOS 4; 2.) Running a libc5 setup on CentOS 4. I'd rather do this, as security fixes would at least be available. Going back to a RH5 machine and working was a real trip; had to use telnet (no ssh on RH5); Kernel 2.0 is still there, no yum, no chkconfig/service subsystem, etc. The custom code is written specifically for AOLserver 2.3 in its tcl dialect and using API functions that don't exist in AOLserver 3.0 or later (or it would be a snap to compile AOLserver 4.0.10 on CentOS4 and roll); there's a couple hundred thousand lines of tcl code here, and while they will be contracting a replacement webapp using Plone/Zope, they aren't ready to transition as yet. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 828-862-5554 www.pari.edu

4 8

Problem with dual-booting soft-RAID
by Kai Schaetzl 11 Jun '06

11 Jun '06

I set up IDE software-RAID on a test machine for testing the recover functionality. The problem is that it somehow won't boot after removing the first disk, although grub etc. seems to be setup okay. Here's some background: 2 disks hda and hdb RAID 1 setup: /dev/md0 (hda1 + hdb1) /boot /dev/md1 (hda2 + hdb2) / /dev/md2 (hda3 + hdb3) swap done with disk druid during initial setup from server disk, so far so good. Then I installed grub to hdb. grub-install complained all the time (I may have given it the wrong parameter), so I used grub directly: root (hd1,0) setup (hd1) That's correct, isn't it? (Is there a way to determine if grub is installed on the correct disk?) I added a third boot entry to the grub.conf (see below). I then removed disk 1 (hda) from the array by unpowering it and rebooted. Unfortunately, that sent me right in the BIOS PXE boot instead of trying the other disk, well, that's a BIOS problem. So I repowered disk 1 and rebooted. The grub on it is still working somehow but just fills the screen with "grub". So I moved disk 2 before disk 1 as a boot device in BIOS and tried again. This time I get a grub prompt. So, grub is obviously correctly installed on it. However, why doesn't it then boot? When I type in the exact same data that I have in grub.conf it boots. I resynced the disks now, but still can't boot normally. grub.conf is like this (taken from another non-RAID, full setup grub.conf and adjusted, so it differs cosmetically): default=0 fallback=2 timeout=10 #splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS (2.6.9-34.0.1.EL) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL ro root=/dev/md1 initrd /initrd-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL.img title CentOS-4 Server_CD (2.6.9-34.EL) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-34.EL ro root=/dev/md1 initrd /initrd-2.6.9-34.EL.img title CentOS 2 (2.6.9-34.0.1.EL) root (hd1,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL ro root=/dev/md1 initrd /initrd-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL.img When I change default to 2 it still doesn't boot, just gets me grub. I then reinstalled grub on the resynced hda with the same commands used earlier (adjusted for it, of course) and rebooted with hda as first boot disk. There's still the same behavior as before: booting from hda gives "grub grub grub ...". So, none of two boots like it should. disk 1 cannot boot at all, although resynced and disk 2 only manually. What could be the problem? Kai

7 20

RE: [CentOS] Tape drive throughput
by Bowie Bailey 11 Jun '06

11 Jun '06

Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:56:36PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I have a backup spooling onto a DLT drive. Is there any tool that > > will let me monitor the data throughput on the device? > > Throughput on a tape drive is very variable, depending on how you are > writing/reading the data to it. > > So for some meaningful numbers, you would need your backup solution > to provide them. I'm just looking for raw bps flowing to the device. I don't really care about compression and such at the moment, I just want a rough idea of what the drive is doing. -- Bowie

5 14

ServerCD for x86_64
by Lazy 11 Jun '06

11 Jun '06

I can't find it. I checked several mirrors without any luck. There was one in 4.2 days but now it's gone. Will there be one for 4.3 ? -- Michal

1 0

rhel source rpms
by bruce 10 Jun '06

10 Jun '06

hi... new to centos, but i have a few questions... i understand that centos is a derivative of rhel, created from the exact/underluing source files used to create rhel. if this is the case, is it possible to get the actual source SRPMS for either RHEL, or for CentOS? I used to see the source files on the redaht system, but I don't seem to see them anymore... i'm curious to know what's better, using CentOS, or the latest fedora FC version... thanks -bruce bedouglas(a)earthlink.net

4 4

CentOS folding@home team
by Sharon Kimble 10 Jun '06

10 Jun '06

Congratulations to the CentOS folding@home team for breaking through the rank 400 barrier. The next target is the rank 250 :) More information about the team can be found at http://www.sharons.org.uk/cf.html, and we welcome new members and their machines. We always need more members and more machines too :) Sharon. -- 18:47:57 up 8 days, 20:56, 2 users, load average: 1.30, 1.76, 1.61 A taste of linux http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html efever http://www.efever.blogspot.com/ Centos 4.3, KDE 3.5.2-7.0, OpenOffice 2.0.2 Registered Linux user 334501

6 5

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 16, Issue 4
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 10 Jun '06

10 Jun '06

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 mailman - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 mailman - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2006:0544 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 mysql - security update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2006:0544 Important CentOS 4 i386 mysql - security update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 mailman - security update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 mailman - security update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 mailman - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 8. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 4 axp mailman - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 9. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 mailman - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 10. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) mailman - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 11. CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) mailman - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 12. CESA-2006:0544 Importatnt CentOS 4 ia64 mysql - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 13. CESA-2006:0544 Importatnt CentOS 4 alpha mysql - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 14. CESA-2006:0544 Importatnt CentOS 4 s390(x) mysql - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:53:56 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2006:0486 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 mailman - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20060609155356.GA26670(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2006:0486 mailman security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0486.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/mailman-2.1.5.1-25.rhel3.5.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mailman-2.1.5.1-25.rhel3.5.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update mailman Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

iptables rules
by Abd El-Hameed Ayad 10 Jun '06

10 Jun '06

Hi, I have 2 CentOS servers 82.201.195.123 & 62.139.61.84 I want to deny all ssh logins on port 22 on (62.139.61.84) from any host except from (82.201.195.123) Can anybody tell me such iptables rules to write in /etc/sysconfig/iptables Currently, im using the following rules (on 62.139.61.84) *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -s 82.201.195.123 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j REJECT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT But i found that somebody is bypassing these rules & trying to authenticate with unknown (or wrong password) accounts Thanx in advance

5 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss