Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Tyan S2891 and CentOS
by rik＠harddata.com 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

I am trying to install CentOS to a server that has a Tyan S2891 motherboard, 2 Opteron 875 Dual Cores and 2GB of RAM. I have been able trying to install over a network but the tg3 driver will not load. I then installed from a DVD and on rebooting after the installation I cannot get the network drivers to load and the RAID controller in the PCI slot is not available. It seems that when I do an lspci -tv the only a minimal amount of devices are seen. [0000:00]-+-00.0 nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller +-01.0 nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge +-01.1 nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus +-02.0 nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller +-02.1 nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller +-06.0 nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE +-09.0-[0000:01]----07.0 ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL \-0e.0-[0000:02]-- Has anyone had success with a combination of parts close to this? Rik

8 24

RE: [CentOS] LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)
by Bowie Bailey 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

From: Bryan J. Smith [mailto:thebs413@earthlink.net] > > Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey(a)BUC.com> wrote: > > It is an interesting choice. It supports multi-master > > replication which I will need and has some GUI management > > utilities. > > Anyone know of any problems with it? > > Only that many people on this list have been ignorant of what > NsDS is in the past, even though it's in major use -- > especially before even the appearance of ADS in Windows 2000, > let alone how well it does integrate it for ADS-to/from-NsDS > synchronization. I.e., NsDS can run on Windows too, and > Fedora makes those binaries available. > > I don't know if I'd trust the FDS 1.0 "open source" version > yet, as it's missing components last time I checked, but the > FDS binaries? 100% NsDS 7.1 -- Linux, Windows, Solaris, > etc... I'm not resistant to changing programs. We are in a testing mode now and I have barely even started looking into how to configure multi-master replication in OpenLDAP. The showstopper at the moment is that FDS 1.0 does not currently support x86_64, which is what our production servers will be running. Bowie

6 10

/var partition and recovery
by Robert 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

greetings bryan, did you say that in your experience the /var partition should _not_ be on the extended partition table for "recovery" purposes? - rh

2 3

Re: [CentOS] /var partition and recovery
by Brian T. Brunner 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

If you have a separate boot partition, I'd not only suggest making it a primary partition for the same reason, but also mounting it read-only for oops-protection. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner(a)gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> thebs413(a)earthlink.net 12/02/05 12:17PM >>> Robert <roberth(a)abbacomm.net> wrote: > greetings > bryan, did you say that in your experience the /var > partition should _not_ be on the extended partition table for > "recovery" purposes? Nope, not at all. I put /var in Extended, LVM and, if you can believe it, even LDM (yes, Windows "dynamic disk" disk label format ;-). I only avoid putting root (/) in anything but a primary partition for recoverability. Even if I use a separate /boot (I rarely do -- I keep my root do only a few GBs max), I still like it outside of any compound disk label. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

2 1

system clock uses UTC selection on centos install
by Robert 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

hello ya know, i have researched this several times over a coupla sdecades and my brains have fallen out again... ;-> so... all of you that are setting up mail and web servers in the USA or other countries, are you clicking and turning on the system clock uses UTC selection on a centos install?? the reason i ask is i research this about every 3 to 5 years and i never remember what i figured out or thought about it... apologies what is the wisdom and usage on the list please? soooooooo help an old man of 40 out please? ;-) thanks and kind regards! - rh

4 3

RE: [CentOS] LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)
by Bowie Bailey 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

From: Bryan J. Smith [mailto:thebs413@earthlink.net] > > Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey(a)BUC.com> wrote: > > I'm not resistant to changing programs. > > I didn't think you needed to, that's why I didn't suggest > FDS. I only commented on FDS after several people commented, > and it was clear that was a tangent going forward. > > > We are in a testing mode now and I have barely even started > > looking into how to configure multi-master replication in > > OpenLDAP. > > Oh, I had assumed you already had OpenLDAP in production. In > that case, download FDS 7.1 (legacy binary version) from > here: > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Special:Download > > > The showstopper at the moment is that FDS 1.0 does not currently > > support x86_64, which is what our production servers will be > > running. > > You can run the i386 version on x86_64. But yeah, from a > scalability standpoint, it would be nice. Their website says: The FDS 1.0 package includes the core DS, the Admin Server, the Management Console, web applications, and other support code for those apps, including online help. These work on 32 bit only - we are working on x86_64 support. I interpreted that to mean that their i386 build would not run on x86_64. Bowie

2 1

RE: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
by Nielsen, Steve 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

lilo is still there. Its just not available as a choice in the install. We build all of our servers using kickstart (automated version of the install) and there lilo can be specified as a boot loader. Steve -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ulrik S. Kofod Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:06 AM To: centos(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2? I can't choose LILO as boot loader anymore in the install process? And what is the advantages in GRUP vs. LILO that are so great that LILO has been deleted all together? One big disadvantages when forced to use GRUB is that it is a hassle to make the disks in a RAID1 bootable. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-March/msg05935.html and RAID1 seems pretty useless when it is the only bootable disk that fails. can someone come up with a nice one-liner that will make GRUB "global" like LILO is out-of-the-box ? or is ther a parameter you can give? I don't know about you but when one of my disks fails I really don't need too many new check marks to worry about on my to do list. best regards Ulrik _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

12 26

Re: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
by Brian T. Brunner 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

The question was "WHY", the answer seems to be "because 'they' didn't like lilo" 1: Inadequate arch support in LILO 2: RAID1 boot problems with GRUB not deemed sufficiently important to leave in LILO until said problem is resolved. For ServerCD 4.3: 1: Please support i586 in the install. Method: if arch is i686, install i686; if it's i386->i586, install i386. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner(a)gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> mail-lists(a)karan.org 12/01/05 11:00AM >>> Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > Probably the LILO RPM missing on the CD. If you rebuild CD image with > LILO RPM > included, it might work. > if you can verify this, could you file this as an issue at http://bugs.centos.org/ - I'll make sure the situation is rectified in time for ServerCD 4.3 thanks - K _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

3 2

standard compiler temp space directory
by Robert 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

greetings apologies for possibly lame question yet ummmmmmmmmm... where do i look in the docs or google to find out what directory(ies) the various compilers and programs are using for temp space? most of my knowledge of old and simple looking has found that most stuff will go in the below directories... it is still /tmp or /var/tmp or similar otherwise? i havent done any compilation in awhile and am setting up a new box and want to make sure i have enough space in the right areas and partitions thanks in advance - rh

2 1

FIXED Re: [CentOS] Re: MD Raid 1 software device not booting not even reaching grub
by Erick Perez 02 Dec '05

02 Dec '05

doing that grub-install /dev/sda will give me the "corresponding BIOS device" error. But now I fixed it by doing a manual grub install. first boot with cd1 and type linux rescue at the prompt when you're at the linux prompt after detecting and mounting the partitions, do a "chroot /mnt/sysimage" then # grub --batch #grub> root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setup (hd0) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)"... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+16 p (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/grub.conf"... succeeded Done. #grub> root (hd1,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd #grub> setup (hd1) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd1)"... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd1) (hd1)1+16 p (hd1,0)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/grub.conf"... succeeded Done. #grub> quit Reboot, you're done. Question: A simple power outage will kill grub's mbr or am i just plain unlucky? On 12/2/05, CM <cristim(a)mail.multinet.ro> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 01:27:36 -0500 > Erick Perez <eaperezh(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Forgot to mention that if I use the rescue mode CD, partitions are > > being recognized and I can do a "chroot /mnt/sysimage". > > However, no idea where to go from there. > > > grub-install /dev/sda > > CM > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ------------------------------------------- Erick Perez Linux User 376588 http://counter.li.org/ (Get counted!!!) Panama, Republic of Panama

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss