Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Addition of Horde
by John Hinton 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

Johnny Hughes wrote: >CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2005:1130-1 > >CentOS 4 x86_64 Horde - Enhancement Update (Extras Only) > >We are pleased to add the Horde Application Framework as well as the >following horde projects to the CentOS extras repository: > >horde >imp-h3 >ingo-h3 >kronolith-h3 >mnemo-h3 >nag-h3 >gollem-h3 >turba-h3 > >Horde is an full featured webmail system for your server, please see >this link for details: > > > This is FANTASTIC news! Great selection of a great product. I've resisted to change to it simply due to the KISS mode of operation I try very hard to follow. A big pat-on-the-back to you folks! John Hinton

2 1

Re: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
by Brian T. Brunner 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

>>> mail-lists(a)karan.org 11/30/05 11:57AM >>> Brian T. Brunner wrote: > The question remains unanswered: WHY was LILO removed? You seem to have missed the post where I highlighted the fact that it has not been removed. ***Yes, the "removed" was only virtual (making it invisible unless you have ***knowledge from elsewhere) not surgical. > > The question was "Hey, REDHAT, *WHY*?" you also seem to have the wrong forum for that question, please contact redhat at one of the following ***Anybody here know of a reason? Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner(a)gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

2 1

X windows is taking 99 percent of cpu
by Jerry Geis 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

I am running centos 4.2 on a P4 3 GIG with 2 GIG ram. This machine has been fine for months. my laptop is fine. X is taking 99 percent of the cpu after some time. All I was doing was editing code. If I killall -9 X it comes back for a while then maxes out again. Any ideas on something to tweek??? THanks, jerry ------------ Tasks: 120 total, 2 running, 118 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 50.2% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 49.8% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 2074188k total, 742456k used, 1331732k free, 39704k buffers Swap: 19984840k total, 0k used, 19984840k free, 527876k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 5270 root 25 0 170m 21m 5808 R 99.9 1.0 7:26.25 X 1 root 16 0 2264 556 476 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.44 init 2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 migration/1 5 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 ksoftirqd/1 6 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.10 events/0 7 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 events/1 8 root 6 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper 9 root 15 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid 33 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/0 34 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/1 44 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush 45 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.25 pdflush 35 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd 47 root 13 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0 48 root 9 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/1 46 root 25 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd0 122 root 25 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod 192 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0 193 root 7 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/1 195 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0 196 root 19 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_1 214 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.18 kjournald 1144 root 6 -10 1560 460 380 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 udevd 1348 root 18 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 shpchpd_event 1828 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kauditd 2029 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmirrord 2030 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmir_mon 2049 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.28 kjournald 2050 root 19 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald 2789 root 16 0 2408 596 508 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 syslogd 2793 root 15 0 3072 472 404 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 klogd 2804 root 16 0 2584 476 404 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 irqbalance 2815 rpc 16 0 2980 580 484 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 portmap 2835 rpcuser 16 0 2440 756 656 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpc.statd 2868 root 16 0 5048 1016 844 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 rpc.idmapd

3 2

Building rpms
by Bowie Bailey 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

I have been asked to update OpenLDAP to the latest stable version. I am using CentOS 4.2 and have OpenLDAP 2.2.13 installed. I can install from source if I have to, but I would rather stay with rpm packages if possible. I found an rpm from Fedora Core Development on RPMFIND. Will this one work with Centos, or should I grab the source rpm and rebuild it? Bowie

2 1

RE: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
by Nielsen, Steve 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

I meant not a visible choice by default :). Thanks for the tip. I was not aware of making it visible in that way. So at the prompt you type: "boot: lilo" ? Steve -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:14 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2? Nielsen, Steve wrote: > lilo is still there. Its just not available as a choice in the install. yes it is available as an install option, you just need to ask anaconda for it ( boot the installer with 'lilo' as an option ) - K _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

php 5.1.1
by Bob Pierce 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

I notice php 5.1.1 was released a few days ago. Are there any plans to include this new version in the centosplus repo for CentOS 4.2? Bob Pierce Systems Analyst Westman Communications Group pierceb(a)westmancom.com

2 1

Is lsdev AWOL?
by Jerry W. Hubbard 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

I was looking at my newly installed CentOS 4.2 system with ls* commands yesterday and lsdev was not on the system. Did I miss installing a package? A Google search for CentOS 4.2 and lsdev was unhelpful. -- Jerry Hubbard hubbardjw(a)charter.net

2 3

kernel panic this morning
by Jerry Geis 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

On 11/30/05, Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote: >/ When I came into work this morning the console had the following: />/ />/ bio_endio />/ __end_that_request_first />/ scsi_end_request />/ scsi_io_completion />/ scsi_finish_command />/ scsi_softirq />/ __do_softirq />/ do_softirg />/ do_irq />/ command_interrupt />/ default_idle />/ cpu_idle />/ start_kernel />/ />/ Panic />/ />Which version of CentOS ar you running? In CentOS 3/RHEL 3 the MD >subsystem has various race conditions (though this does not look like >the signature you would get from one of those panics). >Cheers...james Soory I forgot that I am running 4.2 with all current updates. jerry

1 0

kernel panic this morning
by Jerry Geis 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

When I came into work this morning the console had the following: bio_endio __end_that_request_first scsi_end_request scsi_io_completion scsi_finish_command scsi_softirq __do_softirq do_softirg do_irq command_interrupt default_idle cpu_idle start_kernel Panic I am running software RAID-1 on this machine. I had 2 IDE disks and the machine when down once in a while with similiar messages. I switched to brand new 300 GIG SATA drives and now I am seeing the same kernel panic. What might be the problem here? THanks for any suggestions. Machine has 2 GIG RAM, Intel motherboard, Intel CPU 2.4 P4, "/" is 50 GIG, I have a 5 GIG Swap, and the rest is "/home". where / and /home are RAID-1 arrays. Jerry

2 1

SELinux niggle
by Rob 30 Nov '05

30 Nov '05

Hi, I am not very experienced with SELinux and I have a problem which I can't track down. Any help would be really appreciated. I have an 'install everything' Centos 4.2 system which I am using as a workstation. Before anyone tells me off for installing everything, I have done this in order to get used to CentOS before using it on live servers. Anyway when I log into X (gnome, gdm) I start getting the following in /var/log/messages Nov 30 12:47:39 needme dbus: Can't send to audit system: USER_AVC pid=2916 uid=81 loginuid=-1 message=avc: denied { send_msg } for scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t tcontext=user_u:system_r:initrc_t tclass=dbus Nov 30 12:48:10 needme last message repeated 7 times Nov 30 12:48:12 needme gconfd (MYUSERNAME-3780): Resolved address "xml:readwrite:/home/MYUSERNAME/.gconf" to a writable configuration source at position 0 Nov 30 12:48:15 needme dbus: Can't send to audit system: USER_AVC pid=2916 uid=81 loginuid=-1 message=avc: denied { send_msg } for scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t tcontext=user_u:system_r:initrc_t tclass=dbus And it just keeps filling up my log file. I read James B. Byrne's post on the 15th about audit2allow but I don't believe that I should go fiddling with dbus. Wouldn't that just be shooting the messenger? I know that I wouldn't get these messages on a server because I wouldn't be running X, but I would like to understand what is going on and increase my confidence to admin SELinux properly. Thanks in advance Rob Watkin

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss