Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34748 discussions

Updating on CentOS-3.3
by John Hinton 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

Sorry to be beating a dead horse to death here... but... in the archives, mostly the FAQ is mentioned, but the FAQ seems to be 'coming soon'. :) I just did a clean install of 3.3. I am operating from the command line. I first mistakenly ran.. been there done that on WhiteBox as well. :( rpm --import /usr/share/rhn/RPM-GPG-KEY Got what I understand now is the expected errors. I then ran rpm --import /usr/share/doc/centos-release-3.3/RPM-GPG-KEY I looked and the file is in fact there. And I'm still getting the errors in both up2date -u and yum update. warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 025e513b Error: Could not find the GPG Key necessary to validate pkg /var/cache/yum/update/packages/cups-1.1.17-13.3.16.i386.rpm Thanks for any help. Perhaps one good email clearly explaining the whole deal on this would prevent more of these snippets spread across the archives, until the FAQ is back up? Maybe? ;) Thanks for a great release! John Hinton

2 1

CentOS 3.3
by Dominic Iadicicco 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

Could anyone tell me why the font's in Mozilla look terrible after a fresh install of CentOS 3.3?

5 5

This is interesting
by Dominic Iadicicco 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

Hello all, Now my spell check is missing from the Mozilla mail client. Has anyone experienced this one? and if so, what is the possible solution? Thanks all, Dom

1 1

Re: [Centos] Having little problems with 3.3
by Dominic Iadicicco 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

At least we can solve the oo problem, the disks contain the rpms for it and it did work when I installed it, but whats really scary is the font's in Mozilla. I don't what happed there. Dom Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: >On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 diadicic(a)optonline.net wrote: > > > >>Hello all, >> >> I just installed 3.3. All three disk download ok and when I ran the test on them, all three passed so I thought that the install would go fine and it did. >> However after using it for about 5 min I have noticed two things. OO does not install by default. When I did a reinstall I noticed that there is not option to even select it. Maybe there is something wrong with my disks, I don't know I just what to see if anyone else is having this problem. The rpms for OO are one the disks they just don't install even with the office packages selected during the install. >> >>The other thing I noticed is the fonts in Mozilla. Now CentOS 3.1 and Whitebox 3rc2 fonts in mozilla are great. But CentOS 3.3 I don't know what happen. Like I said may its the disks I downloaded. >> >> >>Has anyone else had or heard of these aliments? >> >> > >Same here. If I go into the "details" for the office selection during the >install, Open Office doesn't even show up. > >Either RedHat messed up on their latest redo, or CentOS has something >broken... > >Ben > > > >

1 0

64 bit support and 32 bit apps
by Dave Augustus 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

2 questions- projected date on 64 bit support? and... can you run a 32-bit app on a 64-bit OS ? I just a read a great article on the Opteron vs. Xeon argument at: http://www.samag.com/documents/sam0411b/ Thanks, Dave

4 3

ftp ftom outside the local network
by Beth Curotto 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

I have Centos3.3 installed, vsftpd, apache2, ports 20&21 open on router, firewall disabled at this time : /etc/passwd looks like this --- ftpadmin:x:502:502::/var/www:sbin/noligin uncommented the lines in /etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf : chroot_list_enable=YES chroot_list_file=/etc/vsftpd.chroot_list I can access ftp from within network no problem, but using external ip it will validate login but cannot bring up folders Any suggestions...... This is the response I get using FileZilla (similar response using CuteFTP) Status: Connecting to 216.201.247.147 ... Status: Connected with 216.201.247.147. Waiting for welcome message... Response: 220 (vsFTPd 1.2.1) Command: USER ftpadmin Response: 331 Please specify the password. Command: PASS ******** Response: 230 Login successful. Command: FEAT Response: 211-Features: Response: MDTM Response: REST STREAM Response: SIZE Response: 211 End Status: Connected Status: Retrieving directory listing... Command: PWD Response: 257 "/" Command: PORT 172,17,2,12,16,230 Response: 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV. Command: TYPE A Response: 200 Switching to ASCII mode. Command: LIST Error: Timeout detected! Error: Could not retrieve directory listing

3 2

DVD set anyone?
by Adrian Madrid 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

Has anybody created succesfully a bootable DVD with the full CentOS? Just wondering, it would be nice to carry one CD instead of three.... Thanks in advance, -- Adrian Madrid HyperX Inc. Mobile: 801.815.1870 Office: 801.566.0670 aemadrid(a)hyperxmedia.com www.hyperxmedia.com 9000 S. 45 W. Sandy, UT 84070

1 0

Having little problems with 3.3
by diadicic＠optonline.net 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

Hello all, I just installed 3.3. All three disk download ok and when I ran the test on them, all three passed so I thought that the install would go fine and it did. However after using it for about 5 min I have noticed two things. OO does not install by default. When I did a reinstall I noticed that there is not option to even select it. Maybe there is something wrong with my disks, I don't know I just what to see if anyone else is having this problem. The rpms for OO are one the disks they just don't install even with the office packages selected during the install. The other thing I noticed is the fonts in Mozilla. Now CentOS 3.1 and Whitebox 3rc2 fonts in mozilla are great. But CentOS 3.3 I don't know what happen. Like I said may its the disks I downloaded. Has anyone else had or heard of these aliments? Thanks all Dominic

1 0

yum.conf issue
by cweisiger＠i-55.com 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

i just did a fresh install of centos-3.1 i ran yum -y update to get all the latest updates.. when it finished the update... of course the yum.conf symlink was broken... and now i how a /etc/centos-yum.conf /etc/yum.conf.rpmsave /etc/yum.conf-SAVE /etc/yum.conf <---broken symlink which of these files to i create a symlink to for /etc/yum.conf so i can continue to get my updates.

3 2

Re: [Centos] openssl-0.9.7a-33.12
by John Newbigin 21 Nov '04

21 Nov '04

You can grab the Net::SSLeay rpm from here: http://dag.wieers.com/packages/perl-Net-SSLeay/perl-Net-SSLeay-1.25-1.1.el3… Don't use cpan, it will just cause pain... John. Dave Augustus wrote: > Why is RH using such an outdated version of OpenSSL ? > > I understand that they may have back-ported the fix but I just tried > installing Net::SSLeay on a Centos 3.3 box and it wouldn't install, saying > that the openssl version was old and suggested I get 9.7b or later? > > How are you handling this problem? I am resorting to recompiling OpenSSL > 9.7d . > > Thanks, > Dave > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss