Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34748 discussions

Trouble with CentOS-Stream-GenericCloud-9-20211208.0.x86_64.qcow2
by Orion Poplawski 22 Dec '21

22 Dec '21

I'm trying to test out the CentOS Stream 9 GenericCloud images. I'm installing with: VM_NAME="centos-stream9" USER_DATA="user-data" DISK="CentOS-Stream-GenericCloud-9.x86_64.qcow2" virt-install \ --name "${VM_NAME}" \ --memory 2048 \ --vcpus 2 \ --import \ --cloud-init user-data="${USER_DATA}" \ --os-variant centos-stream9 \ --disk "${DISK}" \ --network network=default,model=virtio \ --graphics none \ --virt-type kvm But I'm ending up with a corrupted disk image, e.g.: # ls -l /var/lib ls: cannot access '/var/lib/unbound': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/systemd': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/logrotate': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/rpcbind': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/os-prober': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/setroubleshoot': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/rsyslog': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/dhclient': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/kdump': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/cloud': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/nfs': Permission denied ls: cannot access '/var/lib/chrony': Permission denied total 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 84 Dec 7 10:24 alternatives drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Dec 7 10:23 authselect d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? chrony d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? cloud d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? dhclient drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 80 Dec 7 10:24 dnf drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Aug 9 16:40 games drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 55 Dec 9 22:59 gssproxy drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Aug 24 10:22 initramfs d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? kdump d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? logrotate drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Aug 9 16:40 misc drwx------. 2 root root 122 Dec 9 22:59 NetworkManager d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? nfs d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? os-prober drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Aug 9 22:08 PackageKit drwxr-x---. 3 root polkitd 28 Dec 7 10:22 polkit-1 drwx------. 2 root root 6 Dec 7 10:22 private d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? rpcbind drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 91 Aug 19 10:39 rpm drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Dec 7 10:22 rpm-state d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? rsyslog drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 46 Dec 7 10:22 selinux d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? setroubleshoot drwxr-xr-x. 9 root root 105 Dec 7 10:22 sss d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? systemd drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 20 Dec 7 10:22 tpm2-tss d?????????? ? ? ? ? ? unbound Is anyone else seeing this? Anything I'm doing wrong? I'm not seeing any error in the boot messages. -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/

1 1

Add Custom Application to Panel causes Mate panel to crash
by Frank Cox 17 Dec '21

17 Dec '21

As with most people who are using Mate on Centos 8, I am using Mate 1.26.0 from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stenstorp/MATE/ Right-click on the panel, "add to panel" "custom application" The panel crashes. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com

2 2

ha.. that might be quite curious..
by lejeczek 16 Dec '21

16 Dec '21

hi guys check this - https://www.servethehome.com/dude-dell-hpe-ami-american-megatrands/ cheers, L

1 0

network bound disk encryption bond interface not working
by Natxo Asenjo 16 Dec '21

16 Dec '21

hi, running 8.5 I cannot get to automatically unlock the luks container on a dell poweredge 740. This is the setup. The clevis client has bound a tang server: # clevis luks list -d /dev/sdb2 1: tang '{"url":"http://10.x.x.200"}' This sdb2 is the boot device. dracut config: kernel_cmdline="bond=bond0:eno1,eno2:mode=4,miimon=100 ip=10.xx.x.1::10.xx.x.254:255.255.255.0::bond0:none " omit_dracutmodules+="ifcfg" After a reboot, I see that the tang server receives a post from this ip, and sends a 200 back: 16:45:02.247838 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60) 10.xx.x.200.80 > 10.xx.x.1.46374: Flags [S.], cksum 0x391b (incorrect -> 0x0686), seq 2182485757, ack 3195393805, win 28960, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 329378980 ecr 3156670178,nop,wscale 7], length 0 16:45:02.248057 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 8950, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 10.xx.x.1.46374 > 10.xx.x.200.80: Flags [.], cksum 0xa58d (correct), ack 1, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 3156670178 ecr 329378980], length 0 16:45:02.248191 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 8951, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 448) 10.xx.xx.1.46374 > 10.xx.x.200.80: Flags [P.], cksum 0x134d (correct), seq 1:397, ack 1, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 3156670178 ecr 329378980], length 396: HTTP, length: 396 POST /rec/BMZ0nj7Ecn79Au8t24041JoChXk HTTP/1.1 Host: 10.xx.x.200 User-Agent: curl/7.61.1 Accept: */* Content-Type: application/jwk+json Content-Length: 230 {"alg":"ECMR","crv":"P-521","kty":"EC","x":"ARUMMnBG_wm8o3KuHk9qnEPbft1M7SMSlHkFHiSD0dDZSegvIZARe8U1V6lsaYZGSJ8mPBvI-NlUUc4yrdF3naaz","y":"ANQwwFFAEzl6UWiDrv37Pr8yTuWdwlDwq_QR0Q9TNP34_fsJAZ-y3oJv0uIoat6KLhPylWTjAY_jJIblOzWhQZpW"} 16:45:02.248215 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 58644, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 10.xxx.xx.200.80 > 10.xx.x.1.46374: Flags [.], cksum 0x3913 (incorrect -> 0xa3fb), ack 397, win 235, options [nop,nop,TS val 329378980 ecr 3156670178], length 0 16:45:02.282326 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 58645, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 69) 10.xx.x.200.80 > 10.x.x.1.46374: Flags [P.], cksum 0x3924 (incorrect -> 0xe3fa), seq 1:18, ack 397, win 235, options [nop,nop,TS val 329379014 ecr 3156670178], length 17: HTTP, length: 17 HTTP/1.1 200 OK So basically, it should unlock, but it's not unlocking. Does anyone have experience with bond interfaces and nbde on 8/9? TIA. -- regards, Natxo

1 0

log4j cve
by Steve Clark 15 Dec '21

15 Dec '21

Hi List, I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17... Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if something was backported to 1.2 ? Thanks, Steve -- Stephen Clark NetWolves Managed Services, LLC. Sr. Applications Architect Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential and/or protected health information (PHI) and may be subject to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA). This transmission is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this transmission is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalties. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this email and any attachments from any computer. Vaso Corporation and its subsidiary companies are not responsible for data leaks that result from email messages received that contain privileged and confidential and/or protected health information (PHI).

7 9

CentOS 9-stream "CRB" repo
by Chris Adams 15 Dec '21

15 Dec '21

I'm starting to look at CentOS 9-stream... what is the CRB repo? It appears to be a lot of development libraries and such, but I didn't see a definition or "CRB" anywhere. -- Chris Adams <linux(a)cmadams.net>

3 2

something is hammering non-existant floppy
by Jon LaBadie 14 Dec '21

14 Dec '21

On my CentOS7 system, I'm getting message sequences in /var/log/message and in the journal that are nearly identical to the sequence below. They come in multiple times per second. I've deleted the timestamps and system name from the messages. kernel: floppy0: Getstatus times out (0) on fdc 0 kernel: kernel: floppy driver state kernel: ------------------- kernel: now=4476158515 last interrupt=4476158452 diff=63 last called handler=reset_interrupt [floppy] kernel: timeout_message=floppy start kernel: last output bytes: kernel: 8 81 4388061306 kernel: 3 80 4388061326 kernel: d1 90 4388061326 kernel: a 90 4388061326 kernel: 7 90 4388061326 kernel: 0 90 4388061326 kernel: 8 81 4388061730 kernel: 3 80 4388061751 kernel: c1 90 4388061751 kernel: 10 90 4388061751 kernel: 7 80 4388061751 kernel: 0 90 4388061751 kernel: 8 81 4388062074 kernel: 7 80 4388062075 kernel: 0 90 4388062075 kernel: 8 81 4388062399 kernel: 8 80 4402157917 kernel: 8 80 4402213377 kernel: 8 80 4476158452 kernel: 12 80 4476158471 kernel: last result at 4476158452 kernel: last redo_fd_request at 4476158471 kernel: status=0 kernel: fdc_busy=1 kernel: timer_function=ffffffffc01daf70 expires=2957 kernel: cont=ffffffffc01dc400 kernel: current_req=ffff9b0e72239c80 kernel: command_status=-1 kernel: I persume something is trying to access the system's floppy disk drive that does not exist. But I have been unable to identify what's triggering all this activity. Any suggestions? Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie jcu(a)labadie.us

3 4

C9S
by Fred 11 Dec '21

11 Dec '21

Hi! I'm experimenting with C9 Stream, in Virtualbox. I'm hoping someone, somewhere, will provide the Mate desktop for it. I positively cannot stand that Gnome thing that they think we should all be using. I've installed C9 and C9S for epel but they don't have it (yet??) either. Anyone know where I can find it? Thanks in advance! Fred

1 0

Roundcube 1.4.12 on CentOS 8
by Gionatan Danti 11 Dec '21

11 Dec '21

Hi all, I recently updated a CentOS 8 machine to roundcubemail-1.4.12 (from 1.4.11) using remi's repo. I needed to explictly exclude the 1.5.0 packages because it was "shadowing" the latest 1.4.12 release. But now I can not see the 1.4.12 packages anymore - only 1.5.x are provided. Does anyone know why the previous stable package disappeared from remi's repo? Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti(a)assyoma.it - info(a)assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

2 2

rpcbind fails to start with IPv6 disabled
by Jack Bailey 09 Dec '21

09 Dec '21

Hello, Does anyone know if this is still an issue? https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2798411 rpcbind fails to start with IPv6 disabled - Red Hat Customer Portal On RHEL7.3 and later with IPv6 disabled, rpcbind fails to start... Thanks, Jack

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss