On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Karanbir Singh <
mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:
Victor Padro wrote:
> isnt freenas also unionfs ?
>
> Yes it is.
I would therefore pass on freenas, purely on that one point.
My HDs are not using UFS they're on Ext2
Also, conder trimming your posts please
What does that mean, I'm not a native speaker so I didn't follow that, sorry.
Didn't want to ofend or even make mistakes, my only point its that freenas could do the job under a SMB enviroment.
And I don't even compare CentOS between FreeNAS in anything.