12 Apr
2011
12 Apr
'11
3:11 p.m.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/12/2011 12:46 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
If you have a way to do those predictive tests, in serial or parallel, I'm sure that would be a valuable contribution. The possible combinations quickly lead to a combinatorial explosion.
Quite a large part of the functional tests can be automated - specially if there are going to be 100's of people offering them up. Wihtout a doubt we need more of those.
<snip> Let me *strongly* suggest that tests *should* be automated. Not only is it faster, but for regression tests, a human tester will miss occasional steps, where an automated set will guarantee every step is completed.
And it's a *hell* of a lot less boring. Here we go: a screensaver CentOS regression tester....
mark