Dear, I think we are all in the same position and situation and I do not think it is time to cry over spilled milk, now and without putting hands in favor of RedHat, to which I no longer believe anything, we have to move on and support the Community initiatives that are appearing and that I believe will come with the same strength and spirit of our deceased CentOS. Cheers,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:50 PM Walter H. Walter.H@mathemainzel.info wrote:
Why?
it is called "rolling release" and no one gave officially a statement to the question I asked,
if it is meant like that of Win10 ...
a beta release is not the same that many expect as a stable system, as they are used to have with CentOS;
you should think of renaming CentOS to something different, because with Enterprise this CentOS Stream has nothing in common;
and does Redhat really expect everone - even private people - afford a RHEL subscription¹ just to have a stable system?
¹ I would in case I only need just one RHEL subscription for ALL my private used VMs (including the ones hosted in internet as VPS)
- a DNS server
- a proxy server (squid)
- a mail server (mail store - cyrus-imapd)
- a mail server (mail router f. outgoing mails)
- a mail server (mail scanner f. incoming mails with SpamAssassin and
ClamAV)
- a 2nd proxy server (squid, with SSL interception and Squidclamav plus
ClamAV)
- a web server (apache)
- a jump host
- a 6in4 router
- desktop with graphical UI (plus Firefox and Thunderbird) is a now a
SL, but they decided several time ago, not to do their own system based on RHEL, they use CentOS, that is now a little bit bad for this/SL's use case;
- a VPS with OpenVPN (used with my smartphone)
- a VPS with a proxy (squid, to avoid censorship due to geolocation
blocking)
- a VPS as the other end of 6in4
- a VPS with storage of my own files (all VPS run a bind, too)
Thanks for read;
Walter
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos