Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 16:23, Phil Schaffner Philip.R.Schaffner@nasa.gov wrote:
I'd have a look at why an apparently Internet-facing server is 5 point releases, plus a lot of subsequent errata, behind the current 5.7 release level; and what resultant vulnerabilities might have been exploited.
Thanks. There are a lot of very specific software on that server that precludes it from being updated. I believe that 5.2 still is seeing security updates, no?
No.