Am 06.02.2014 um 17:41 schrieb "Phelps, Matt" mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Fabian Arrotin fabian.arrotin@arrfab.netwrote:
On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com
wrote:
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.html
Yes, please. Can the CentOS folks check with their newly minted Red Hat brethren on this issue?
This is getting critical for us. We have over a hundred CO6 desktops that are currently running an insecure version of chromium. The security
people
are all over us on this!
We need to run chrome/chromium in order to manage our Google Apps for Government deployment (for over 1000 users). It doesn't work right with firefox.
If we need to apply pressure elsewhere, please let us know where to
direct
our fury.
... to Google ? (especially because it's *their* browser to support *their* Google Apps ....)
Of course we already have notified Google.
I was hoping for a little more granularity. Google is a large place; as is Red Hat I know. There was word that Red Hat was working with Google on a solution, and I was hoping to hear if there was any movement.
I can't ask Red Hat since we don't pay for it, but perhaps the new CentOS relationship with them can offer a channel of communication for the Community.
i do not understand, having such infrastructure and not even a subscription. CentOS lives also because professionals pay upstream for their work.
-- LF