19 Dec
2013
19 Dec
'13
12:19 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:55 PM, John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 4:33 PM, Lists wrote:
This large value doesn't really make sense to me - can somebody explain why the change to such a large value?
its just a limit, it has no impact unless someone claims too much shared memory.
the only place it makes sense to set it small is on a shared ssytem with potentially hostile users who might think its funny to allocate too much and cause a denial of service.... eg, Students.
Thank the gods there are so few networked systems these days!
Paco Marmotta