On 17/02/16 14:32, Michael H wrote:
Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply;
The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as Important .. so you should boot to that anyway: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-February/021705.html
Here is a good link to figure out what to restart if you don't want to reboot:
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/which-services-need-restarting-after-a...
and there is this thread: http://markmail.org/message/dodinyrhwgey35mh
But generalyl, after a glibc update or a kernel update .. rebooting is easiest and it ensures everything is protected.
Wow, so, I updated my server (yum update -y) which applied a new kernel and the new glibc among other things, After the update completed it knocked my master postgresql database offline.
Feb 17 13:46:11 db1 systemd: Starting PostgreSQL database server... Feb 17 13:46:11 db1 pg_ctl: LOG: invalid value for parameter "max_stack_depth": 16384 Feb 17 13:46:11 db1 pg_ctl: DETAIL: "max_stack_depth" must not exceed 7680kB. Feb 17 13:46:11 db1 pg_ctl: HINT: Increase the platform's stack depth limit via "ulimit -s" or local equivalent. Feb 17 13:46:11 db1 pg_ctl: FATAL: configuration file "/var/lib/pgsql/data/postgresql.conf" contains errors Feb 17 13:46:16 db1 pg_ctl: pg_ctl: could not start server Feb 17 13:46:16 db1 pg_ctl: Examine the log output. Feb 17 13:46:16 db1 systemd: postgresql.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Feb 17 13:46:16 db1 systemd: Failed to start PostgreSQL database server. Feb 17 13:46:16 db1 systemd: Unit postgresql.service entered failed state. Feb 17 13:46:16 db1 systemd: postgresql.service failed.
I have kernel parameters specified in /etc/sysctl.conf
vm.swappiness=0 vm.overcommit_memory=2 vm.overcommit_ratio=90 kernel.shmmax=35433480192 kernel.shmall=8650752
After the update my postgresql service could not start because these parameters had been reset, I promptly rebooted to server to re-apply them.
Has something changed?!? after a reboot the service still complained that my max_stack_depth was too high because kernel shmmax and shmall were too low with the same error shown above.
[root@db1 ~]# ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority (-e) 0 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals (-i) 514616 max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files (-n) 1024 pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8 POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 real-time priority (-r) 0 stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited max user processes (-u) 514616 virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited file locks (-x) unlimited
confirms that my entries in /etc/sysctl.conf were ignored.
Why would these not work anymore?
Are the parameters specified elsewhere now?
any information would be very helpful!
Some additional information;
sysctl -a | grep kernel.shm kernel.shmall = 8650752 kernel.shmmax = 35433480192 kernel.shmmni = 4096
which corresponds to my /etc/sysctl.conf kernel.shmmax=35433480192 kernel.shmall=8650752
but contradicts; ulimit -a [...] stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 [...]
Any suggestions as to why this has happened?
thanks
Michael