Sorry for the top post.
Nagios can start very simple, but has the ability to end up very complex.
It's configs take a modular approach, you have monitors, monitors belong in groups, groups have operators/administrators, etc.
My big problem with nagios is when I used it last it didn't keep monitor history which makes trending impossible.
I eventually went with ipmonitor from solarwinds which has a nice web interface, all the reporting you may want and works pretty much like nagios does, but through a web interface. Very reasonable pricing too.
Of course I believe it only runs on windows, but it runs very nicely as a VM guest.
-Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: centos-bounces@centos.org <centos-bounces@centos.org>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>
Sent: Tue May 13 07:34:50 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:
2008/5/13 Kai Schaetzl <maillists@conactive.com>:
> Sergio Belkin wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 23:07:20 -0300:
>
> > [CentOS] Somewhat OT:
>
> even then please write a senseful subject next time!
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
>
Yes, you're roght Kai, I don't know how I could write such a stupid
subject, but it was too late yersterday, and I was writing with a
little part of my brain working :)
Even so, thanks for your comments, I'd like more experiences about
monitoring systems. Again of topic, I want to avoid Nagios because it
looks like over complex but if someone has an actual experience
demostrating the opposite, I'd be glad to hear.
Thanks in advance
--
--
Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
Sergio Belkin -
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos