----- Original Message -----
From: "Rajagopal Swaminathan" raju.rajsand@gmail.com To: "CentOS mailing list" centos@centos.org Sent: Friday, January 7, 2011 6:35:00 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] RHEVM List Greetings,
On 1/7/11, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jim Wildman jim@rossberry.com wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.volotinen@iki.fi wrote:
It was completely useless: hopefully RHEL 6 and CentOS 6 get it right.
As the OP, I wish to report that I was able to create at least one vm using RHEV. I followed the guidelines given by Simon and had a openfiler available on an esx today.
I am yet to make the iso domain available to install OS in the guest.
RHEV and RHEV-M rocks so far.
Glad to here that. I'm sure you'd also be happy with KVM+virtio+TGT over Centos P.S with this combination you can actually have TGT running on the host meaning max IO performance while RHEM-Manager installed within a VM running on the same host :)
And Oh I am working with one of RH partners and they do have legitimate access to support. I recently took up the assignment and there were some registration stepe etc to be completed with RHN and the such which are scheduled later. for registering the call.
Though the idea I proposed about the public mailing list is still valid.
It's valid indeed. When RHEV will open for public evaluation there will be one. In the mean while you have Red Hat's support for your disposal.
Regards, Simon.
If only the entry barrier were not there, we individuals can otherwise help pass some worthy (or unworthy) comments on the products.
Thanks for all those responded.
Regards,
Rajagopal _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos