In article b0189c04b5d9a25bd50d4ceacf479b79.squirrel@mail.5-cent.us, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 05:16 -0700, Craig White wrote:
Gmagic/Imagick are somewhat incapable of doing graphing at all.
Have you ever really looked ? What about GmagickDraw::point and similar items ?
I think the risk of the KISS approach is that you tend to reimplement everything, because everything everyone else has done is overcomplicated.
The "danger" of KISS approach? So, you endorse complex and complicated schemes? And here I thought that the True Believers in OO asserted that OOP was cleaner, simpler, and easier.
As Einstein said once: "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
More to the point would be: "Judging something *solely* on its simplicity is an overly simplistic approach." -- Kiel Hodges. This appears to me to be the trap that Paul Always Learning has fallen into.
Cheers Tony