It's a matter of "consistency". The script began #!/bin/bash and so a direct shell invocation should _also_ use the same command.
Good point. I'll try to keep that in mind.
Thank you, Tim
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Stephen Harris lists@spuddy.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 09:00:06PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Stephen Harris lists@spuddy.org said:
You should use "bash -x" ("bash" and not "sh" because sh may not be
bash
everywhere; eg Ubuntu; "-x" and not "+x" because "-x" means "turn on
debug"
but "+x" means "turn _off_ debug")
Unless you have specific bashisms (which I don't think the original did, and you should mostly avoid in scripts), sh -x will be fine.
It's a matter of "consistency". The script began #!/bin/bash and so a direct shell invocation should _also_ use the same command.
--
rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos