On Tuesday 28 June 2005 21:18, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
Dude, I haven't seen any proof from you. All we've gotten was 100% out-of-context assumption. You can look up board specs, that has *0* to do with this?
I had board specs, I had timing diagrams, I had CPU specs, I had chipset docs, I had bus docs, I had ...
They all have 0 to do with the problem? What kind of document would you accept?
Traces don't mean squat, we've been through this.
Alright - tell me what you want to see :-)
I've contacted the gentleman at AMD regarding the patch, because I can't find his post in the LKML archives (I already admitted off-the-bat, before anyone else, it was _not_ in the February 17, 2004 thread).
I'm also going through the kernel's VM right now. There are no less than 5 major models to x86/x86-64. And it _does_ require you to use a "BIOS hack" that is COMPLETELY INCOMPATIBLE with PAE36 OSes.
Thank you - 32bit only please... we all agree that AMD64 can address more than 4GB without issues.
Peter.