Am 03.07.2013 um 15:10 schrieb Pete Geenhuizen pete@geenhuizen.net:
On 07/03/2013 08:34 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Tue, July 2, 2013 17:34, John Hinton wrote:
Ditto here, and for the same reasons.
This was our experience as well; changing userids between clam and clamav between updates caused us a lot of avoidable headaches. We switched to epel for clamav because of that one issue. Otherwise we have been very pleased with rpmforge. It will prove a great loss if there is a serious possibility that this resource might fade away.
Fading away is a distinct possibility. David Hrbac, who is trying to maintain rpmforge had this to say on that subject.
"And of course, there's still a question about the Repoforge. Do we really want it? Isn't a time for Epel to replace Repoforge? I still want to keep Repoforge alive bud have no replies from Dag."
for an assessment of such statements is the context essential (Subject: Clamav)
http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2013-July/thread.html
-- LF