On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Chris Adams linux@cmadams.net wrote:
All that matters for CentOS is:
1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS because of Red Hat's lawyers' interpretation of GPL+CDDL 2: Arguing about it here will not change #1 3: CentOS ships a clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and so won't have things that Red Hat's lawyers don't approve (see #2)
Please let it go. I think everybody here knows your opinion.
+1
I for one will go with Btrfs. This is where the action is at, ATM, and more and more companies are investing in BTRFS and going with it: SUSE, Fujitsu, Docker, Facebook, Oracle...
/// Btrfs 1.0, with finalized on-disk format, was originally slated for a late-2008 release,[12] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-12 and was finally accepted into the Linux kernel mainline http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_mainline in 2009.[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-13 Several Linux distributions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution began offering Btrfs as an experimental choice of root file system http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_file_system during installation.[14] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-14[15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-15[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-16 In summer 2012, several Linux distributions moved Btrfs from experimental to production or supported status.[17] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-17[18] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-18 ////
The ZFS Zealots (ZZ or Z-square) brigade act like kids on a temper trantum because they preferred toy was left out of the playground. Please get down your crying and yelling, there's people trying to work here (with btrfs). ;-p
FC