15 Nov
2005
15 Nov
'05
11:27 p.m.
Craig White wrote:
caching-nameserver is just the config files ... it requires bind to be installed too
given the fact that the result of an update breaks working configurations and avoiding that situation is one of the targets of the upstream provider, the upstream provider probably should invest a little bit of time/energy to ensure that this is unlikely to occur.
Given there are idiot admins like me who rarely miss an opportunity to step on their d*cks...(I think I only got caught on this once but never knew until now, why that was the case).
Heh...that's OK. I only discovered this by accident as well. And it was only very recently...maybe 6-9 months ago...after having used RH Linux since version 4-ish.
Cheers,