At Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:17:22 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:m.roth@5-cent.us">m.roth@5-cent.us</a> wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:40c4699fc9f09a3b67e6c69636e41b14.squirrel@host290.hostmonster.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Whit Blauvelt wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:m.roth@5-cent.us">m.roth@5-cent.us</a> wrote:
</pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be otherdrives, or at least other partitions.... </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">Kind of makes you wonder why RH's default install is to shove everything but boot into one partition these days, doesn't it? In trying to make everything immune from the most clueless users - who might (horrors) make a partition too small - RH defaults to something other than time-honored old-school best practices. Yeah, I never accept the defaults. But I'm not </pre>
</blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> Very, dare I say it?, Windows-ish. On the other hand, for an enterprise O/S, I would sorta-kinda assume that /home was being NFS-mounted. Just about everywhere I've worked, it is. <snip> </pre> </blockquote> Not trying to hijack but this last comment has provoked a question.<br> <hijack><br> If you have multiple CentOS machines that you regularly log onto and use, and these share a common /home/username (via NFS or other SAN mechanism) how do the various .xxxx files manage to work - aren't there potential conflicts?<br> I have two CentOS 5.5 workstations with dual monitors (different sizes though) and another machine with only a single display - wouldn't this cause issues? Unfortunately I do not have enough experience to know
The X server does not use .xxxx files in /home for display setup, it uses /etc/X11/xorg.conf, which will be specific to the local hardware (video card, number of monitors, etc.).
It is *presumed* that if you are in a shop with multiple desktops/workstations using NFS / automounted /home, that the base O/S on every machine is more or less the same version -- eg the admins do 'yum update' on all of the machines and thus keeping them all the same.
what all these various . files contain - if they're only personal preferences and totally unrelated to the hardware then well and good - can someone confirm before I migrate my /home onto my main server and NFS mount it. TIA<br>
So long as:
If all of the machines are kept more or less in sync WRT system software versions (which is good admin practice anyway), there should not be any problems. Some of your .xxxx files may have to test the environment (eg X11/Gnome related ones should be checking this and/or using relative placement geometries).
</hijack><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:40c4699fc9f09a3b67e6c69636e41b14.squirrel@host290.hostmonster.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> mark
CentOS mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a> </pre>
</blockquote> </body> </html>
begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob org:Team Torman Realty adr:;;13019 Water Point Blvd;Windermere;FL;34786;USA email;internet:rob@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard
MIME-Version: 1.0
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos