6 Nov
2014
6 Nov
'14
8:30 p.m.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote:
BTW:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official "supplementary" ones from RH?
In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment, etc... ? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I don't know, and that's the point! Personally, I'd be OK with using it, but since my work is audited by the Federal Gum'mint, I don't know how they'd feel about it. :)
--
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu