On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster <
leonfauster@googlemail.com>
wrote:
BTW:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the
official
"supplementary" ones from RH?
In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches,
environment,
etc... ?
Yes, those use the Developer Tool Set .. the ones from Red Hat do not.
I can not get the Sources for the Red Hat supplemental channel because they do distribute the pepperflash component.
I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.
Am I correct in interpreting, that even if RH wanted to release the supplemental package for Chromium to CentOS they would not be able to because it contains the pepperflash component.