On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:52 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Andrew Wyatt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote:
On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
William Woods wrote:
Please stop top posting. > On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote: >> William Woods wrote: >>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning <centos@u62.u22.net
>>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >>>> >>>>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 >>>>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants
to
>>>>> be everything which makes it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - >>>>> umm.. like Windoze! >>>>> My $.02 >>>> + $ 10.00 :-) >>> Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ? >>> >> Well... we know that > 50% of the Web and 'Net runs on Linux and >> other unices. Compare and contrast the number of Windows Server >> vulnerabilities that have been exploited to those of *Nix... and, >> for extra credit, how fast they were admitted, and fixed..... >> > Like OpenSSL ? I suggest you google with the following search criteria: "windows server" exploits
Sigh, nothing like a zealot. ALL OS's have vulns and exploits, no
matter
what you decide to believe.
Sigh, nothing like someone who is in a constant state of deniability.
Replying to this, because I saw a reply from him, but there was no new content, for some reason.
Anyway, he also seems determined to see it all as black and white, rather than looking at the *much* larger set of bugs and
vulnerabilities that
Windows Server has had than any version of 'Nix. Sure, we have some... but a *lot* fewer, and overwhelmingly far less serious.
Yup, overwhelmingly less serious.
Oh, wait.
This is *pointless*. Point to something *OTHER* than heartbleed. And as this is the CentOS list, please note that 5.x was *not* affected at all.
Or does your attention span not go back more than a couple of months?
mark, getting annoyed
Ok, older. I can do that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962792
Have another one. Doesn't matter that 5.x wasn't affected at all by Heartbleed, 5.x is ancient and had its own set of flaws over its lifecycle.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos