The original poster has not replied, so we do not know his reasoning.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John R. Dennison jrd@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:04:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Umm, yeah. Encrypted protocols would never be compromised....
Which do you think is more likely? Someone sniffing a cleartext credential set on the wire or someone subverting an alleged "secure" encrypted protocol?
For things that matter, you should expect both. For things that don't matter, well they don't matter.
Exactly. For instance, what if he needs to use some product whose vendor has never heard of ssh (or company died)? What if he is building a test lab for learning how to use wireshark? Until he comes back and lets us know, we are just farting in the wind.
Personally I expect him to know what he is doing
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos