Re: [CentOS] forwarding packets to service in same host without using loopback network

Arif Hossain wrote:

This question is not about linux usage. But still i think user list is a good crowd for linux programmer. So here it goes. I have this libnetfilter_queue application which receives packets from kernel based on some iptables rule. Before going straight to my problem, i'm giving a sample workable code and other tools to set up a test environment so that We problem definition and possible solutions can be more accurate and robust.

The following code describes the core functionality of the application:

Are you a student?

I ask, because in both functions, the first thing I see is

  if (ph)
    {
      id = ntohl (ph->packet_id);
      printf ("hw_protocol=0x%04x hook=%u id=%u ",
	      ntohs (ph->hw_protocol), ph->hook, id);
    }

and you have *no* error handling if !ph. If this should never be true, then a) why is it in an if statement, and b) I will say, with 99.44% confidence, that it *will* be the case sometime, in a situation you haven't thought of.

I'm at work, so I may get back to this after work.

mark

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/netfilter.h>	/* for NF_ACCEPT */
#include <errno.h>

#include <libnetfilter_queue/libnetfilter_queue.h>
#define PREROUTING 0
#define POSTROUTING 4
#define OUTPUT 3


/* returns packet id */
static u_int32_t
print_pkt (struct nfq_data *tb)
{
  int id = 0;
  struct nfqnl_msg_packet_hdr *ph;
  struct nfqnl_msg_packet_hw *hwph;
  u_int32_t mark, ifi;
  int ret;
  unsigned char *data;

  ph = nfq_get_msg_packet_hdr (tb);
  if (ph)
    {
      id = ntohl (ph->packet_id);
      printf ("hw_protocol=0x%04x hook=%u id=%u ",
	      ntohs (ph->hw_protocol), ph->hook, id);
    }

  hwph = nfq_get_packet_hw (tb);
  if (hwph)
    {
      int i, hlen = ntohs (hwph->hw_addrlen);

      printf ("hw_src_addr=");
      for (i = 0; i < hlen - 1; i++)
	printf ("%02x:", hwph->hw_addr[i]);
      printf ("%02x ", hwph->hw_addr[hlen - 1]);
    }

  mark = nfq_get_nfmark (tb);
  if (mark)
    printf ("mark=%u ", mark);

  ifi = nfq_get_indev (tb);
  if (ifi)
    printf ("indev=%u ", ifi);

  ifi = nfq_get_outdev (tb);
  if (ifi)
    printf ("outdev=%u ", ifi);
  ifi = nfq_get_physindev (tb);
  if (ifi)
    printf ("physindev=%u ", ifi);

  ifi = nfq_get_physoutdev (tb);
  if (ifi)
    printf ("physoutdev=%u ", ifi);

  ret = nfq_get_payload (tb, &data);
  if (ret >= 0)
    printf ("payload_len=%d ", ret);

  fputc ('\n', stdout);

  return id;
}


static int
cb (struct nfq_q_handle *qh, struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg,
    struct nfq_data *nfa, void *data)
{
  uint32_t ip_src, ip_dst;
  struct in_addr s_ip;
  struct in_addr d_ip;
  uint16_t src_port;
  uint16_t dst_port;
  int verdict;
  int id;
  int ret;
  unsigned char *buffer;
  struct nfqnl_msg_packet_hdr *ph = nfq_get_msg_packet_hdr (nfa);
  if (ph)
    {
      id = ntohl (ph->packet_id);
      printf ("received packet with id %d", id);
    }
  ret = nfq_get_payload (nfa, &buffer);
  ip_src = *((uint32_t *) (buffer + 12));
  ip_dst = *((uint32_t *) (buffer + 16));
  src_port = *((uint16_t *) (buffer + 20));
  dst_port = *((uint16_t *) (buffer + 22));
  s_ip.s_addr = (uint32_t) ip_src;
  d_ip.s_addr = (uint32_t) ip_dst;
  *(buffer + 26) = 0x00;
  *(buffer + 27) = 0x00;
  printf ( "source IP %s", inet_ntoa (s_ip));
  printf ( "destination IP %s", inet_ntoa (d_ip));
  printf ( "source port %d", src_port);
  printf ( "destination port %d", dst_port);
  if (ret)
    {
      switch (ph->hook)
	{
	case PREROUTING:
	  printf ( "inbound packet");
	  //my_mangling_fun();
	  break;
	case OUTPUT:
	  printf ( "outbound packet");
	  //my_mangling_fun();
	  break;
	}
    }
  verdict = nfq_set_verdict (qh, id, NF_ACCEPT, ret, buffer);
  if (verdict)
    printf ( "verdict ok");
  return verdict;
}

int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
  struct nfq_handle *h;
  struct nfq_q_handle *qh;
  struct nfnl_handle *nh;
  int fd;
  int rv;
  char buf[4096] __attribute__ ((aligned));

  printf ("opening library handle\n");
  h = nfq_open ();
  if (!h)
    {
      fprintf (stderr, "error during nfq_open()\n");
      exit (1);
    }

  printf ("unbinding existing nf_queue handler for AF_INET (if

any)\n"); if (nfq_unbind_pf (h, AF_INET) < 0) { fprintf (stderr, "error during nfq_unbind_pf()\n"); exit (1); }

  printf ("binding nfnetlink_queue as nf_queue handler for

AF_INET\n"); if (nfq_bind_pf (h, AF_INET) < 0) { fprintf (stderr, "error during nfq_bind_pf()\n"); exit (1); }

  printf ("binding this socket to queue '0'\n");
  qh = nfq_create_queue (h, 0, &cb, NULL);
  if (!qh)
    {
      fprintf (stderr, "error during nfq_create_queue()\n");
      exit (1);
    }

  printf ("setting copy_packet mode\n");
  if (nfq_set_mode (qh, NFQNL_COPY_PACKET, 0xffff) < 0)
    {
      fprintf (stderr, "can't set packet_copy mode\n");
      exit (1);
    }

  fd = nfq_fd (h);

  for (;;)
    {
      if ((rv = recv (fd, buf, sizeof (buf), 0)) >= 0)
	{
	  printf ("pkt received\n");
	  nfq_handle_packet (h, buf, rv);
	  continue;
	}
      /* if your application is too slow to digest the packets that
       * are sent from kernel-space, the socket buffer that we use
       * to enqueue packets may fill up returning ENOBUFS. Depending
       * on your application, this error may be ignored. Please, see
       * the doxygen documentation of this library on how to improve
       * this situation.
       */
      if (rv < 0 && errno == ENOBUFS)
	{
	  printf ("losing packets!\n");
	  continue;
	}
      perror ("recv failed");
      break;
    }

  printf ("unbinding from queue 0\n");
  nfq_destroy_queue (qh);

#ifdef INSANE
  /* normally, applications SHOULD NOT issue this command, since
   * it detaches other programs/sockets from AF_INET, too ! */
  printf ("unbinding from AF_INET\n");
  nfq_unbind_pf (h, AF_INET);
#endif

  printf ("closing library handle\n");
  nfq_close (h);

  exit (0);
}

Notice in the callback function two calls to my_mangling_fun() is commented out. This is where i mangle the incoming and outgoing packet. I think this code would be sufficient to describe my case. If further clarification is need please ask, i will post further details.

Lets say accompanying iptables rules are following :

$iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 5000 -j NFQUEUE
$iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 5000 -j NFQUEUE

lets compile and fire udp the thing.

$gcc -g3 nfq_test.c -lnfnetlink -lnetfilter_queue
$./a.out (should be as root)

now we can feed garbage udp payload to this thing by netcat both client and server mode

$nc -ul 5000
$nc -uvv <IP> 5000

This will print the packet from my netfilter_queue app in stdout. Now that the development environment is set up, we can move to the next thing.

What we are trying to achieve is following :

Our server is listening on 5000 port. Now all incoming packet destined to udp port 5000 will be queued by kernel. And the handle to this queue will be given to user application we listed earlier. This queue mechanism works like this: When a packet is available, the callback function(cb() in our code) is called. after processing, the callback function calls nfq_set_verdict(). after a **verdict** is returned, next packet will pop from the queue. notice that a packet will not pop from queue if its preceding packet has not been issued a verdict. This verdict values are NF_ACCEPT for accepting packet, NF_DROP for dropping the packet.

Now what if i want to concatenate the udp payloads of the incoming and outgoing packet without touching client and server side code?

If i want to concatenate udp payloads from our app this very app, then we need to have multiple packets at hand. But we have seen that a packet does not pops from queue before a verdict is issued to its preceding one.

So how can this be done?

One possible solution is issue a NF_DROP to every packet and save those packets in an intermediate data structure. Let's say we have done it. But how can this packet can be delivered to the service listening on 5000 port?

We can't use network stack for delivering the packet, because if we do, then packets will end up in NFQUEUE again.

Another problem is, the server is totally agnostic about this app. That means it should not see any difference in the packets. It should see packets as if it came from the original client.

I have heard that a application can send data to a server in the same host without using network layer(ip,port) by writing some files. I do not know the validity of this statement. But if anyone knows anything about it , it will be wonderful.

Another possible solution proposed to me is :

1.store packets in the application and return verdict NF_DROP 2.re-inject packets into the network stack using RAW sockets 3.tag concatenated UDP packets with a DSCP (see IP packet format) 4.in iptables, add a rule to match on this DSCP (--dscp) and ACCEPT the packet directly, without it passing through your netfilter application 5.If the provider already tags some packets with DSCP, you can add some iptables rules to clear them, like:

$iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -j DSCP --set-dscp 0

-- -aft _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos