On 08/10/14 02:25 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/8/2014 11:14 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/8/2014 10:45 AM,m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
> I want to*WHACK* Poettering between the eyes, and get his
attention.
> Maybe that would get past his self-centered self-importance.
look in the mirror.
Why? In what way am I coming up with new complicated overlays for what we both use, and effectively forcing you to use it?
And note that I used the word "forcing" because most organizations of any size are about as likely to*completely* change o/s's to another
vendor
as they are to celebrate May Day by running through the streets in the nude.
I was commenting re your constant complaining that you don't like change, therefore its all wrong/bad/whatever. In YOUR opinion.
First, I refute that - I do not "constantly complain" that I don't like change; I do have every right to join others, with all of us complaining that we dislike a significant sweeping change. And, for that matter, most of us don't have time in our life to join the fedora developer's list, and argue there long enough and loudly enough to promote change.
we get it already, give it a rest. If you want to complain to someone for choosing to use systemd or whatever, bitch at Red Hat, not CentOS, and certainly not the CentOS user community (this list).
Does this also apply to everyone else on the list complaining? Why single me out, esp. since I was *not* the OP for this thread.
mark
The complaining about systemd (again) started with your comment:
==== Can someone just send the team that's working systemd on a nice vacation, say, maybe northern Iraq/Syria, the land of ISIS? ====
You advocated indirectly for a contributor's harm because you don't like his work. Before that, Steve Clark referenced the /. article and Jonathan commented on his preference for Phronix as a news source.