23 Oct
2016
23 Oct
'16
1:31 a.m.
On Sat Oct 22 08:20:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
I should have said CentOS 7. Older ones (CentOS 6 and 5) are not vulnerable.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344
Comment #35 points to a link that doesn't depend on /proc/self/mem and claims to work on CentOS 6 and 5. I'm not quite sure what I should be looking for when I run the program, though.
I do hope Redhat releases patches soon.
Cheers, Zube