On 7/24/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 12:45 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
>
> Thank you for your point, on which I wholly agree, but I was
> taking "stability" as "a measure of velocity in change" of a
> system's components-- here reflected in a shorter or longer
> life cycle for each version.
Seems like a bad concept - if something is broken in the initial release
you really do want the change that fixes it...
You surely want them, but I can't see why it's a bad concept-- "Distro
X has published Y weekly MB of updates on average over the last
year" is just a fact.