Top posting, I'll apologize also.
Hey, I appreciate the moderation - I've mentioned before, the general Redhat list, we've gotten spams, and it takes days or weeks before the alleged moderator gets around to answering a number of us and does something.
mark m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/16997/oracle_rips_red_hat_and_sort_of_launche...
oracle: just another centos wanna-be?
Um, this is news? I thought Oracle pushed "Unbreakable Linux" out the door at *least* last year.
read the article carefully. this isn't unbreakable linux, that *is* old news. this is oracle's (alleged) followup.
You're right - they've announced unbreakable unbreakable linux, u^2 linux.
<g>
But then, you have heard that in the latest release of Sun's, er, Oracle's java, they changed the identifier to read Oracle, rather than Sun Microsystems, and for some idiot java (sorry, I repeat myself) reason, a fair number of packages out there, including ALL VERSIONS OF ECLIPSE for the last 3-4 years, break, because they can't find those magic words, rather than just looking at versions...?
mark
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos