On 01/12/2014 06:01 PM, Darod Zyree wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 11:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Hi,
How about using rpm to see what extra packages are installed then we may be able to work out why.
Perform a Manual install and save the result of rpm -qa | sort, then run your KickStart based installed and run the same command. A diff between the two results should show whats extra packages are being installed. :)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Darod Zyree darodzyree@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 22:20 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/12/2014 10:10 PM, Darod Zyree wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know why an Anaconda Kickstart installation deploys more
rpm
packages than a manual "basic" installation?
In both cases the following package groups were installed/used
according
to anaconda-ks.cfg in root home directory: @core, @server-policy, @workstation-policy
what ones are more or which ones are missing ?
also compare the anaconda-ks.cfg left behind on both attempts, are you sure the %packages section looks identical ?
My kickstart installation does 397 RPM packages. A manual installation does 217 RPM packages.
My kickstart installation uses only an OS repository; no updates, epel or anything like that for this test.
This repository was created using rsync and centos 6.5 iso.
Kickstart package list: %packages @core @server-policy @workstation-policy
Which is the same as choosing the "minimal" installation type during manual anaconda as shown in the /root/anaconda-ks.cfg file after the manual installation is completed.
see attachment diff
The mail list does not accept attachments. You must either paste the content into the email or post the file to drop box or some similar service.