On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 23:45 -0800, Bob Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 19:56 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 15:37 -0800, Bob Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:41 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Bob Taylor bob8221@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
<snip>
[snip]
Priority *and* protect? Supposed to be a no-no.
Worse, it's on the updates too. I would carefully examine all your repo defs and have *either* protect or priority, but not both. Also make sure the settings are appropriate sionce you've add some other repos.
Thanks for your response, Bill. I added the protect lines attempting to locate this problem. I've removed all protect lines.
I've been using Rpmforge for a long time, NP. But at the time I established priorities, I disabled all protect settings.
And there are a couple exclude and include setups for a few special instances.
Mind telling me what these are?
S/B nothing of interest, but here's a condensed version.
============== Useless/uninteresting lines snipped ===================== [rpmforge] name = Red Hat Enterprise $releasever - RPMforge.net - dag mirrorlist = http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/mirrors-rpmforge enabled = 1 gpgkey = file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmforge-dag gpgcheck = 1 # NEXT LINE WRAPPED - CAREFUL protect=0 priority=10 includepkgs=bittorrent.noarch, bittorrent- gui.noarch, python-khashmir.noarch, python-crypto.i386 rtorrent, libtorrent.i386, libtorrent-devel.i386, libsigc*, mplayer.i386, mplayer- docs.i386, mplayer-fonts.noarch, mplayerplug-in.i386, aalib.i386, faac.i386, lame.i386, libXvMCW.i386, libdvdnav.i386, libmad.i386, libmpcdec.i386, lirc.i386, lzo.i386, openal.i386, x264.i386, xvidcore.i386, libmp4v2.i386 gkrellm.i386 # mplayer-skins.noarch, ==========================================================================
Some of the above may not be appropriate any more - I've not looked in awhile.