Thanks. Can any of the syslog alternatives be configured to have more local facilities than what&#39;s available in syslog (I think syslog-ng has the same problem) ?<div><br></div><div>-- m<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ivazqueznet@gmail.com">ivazqueznet@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 13:29 -0500, Marc G. wrote:<br>
&gt; I may be posting to the wrong list here, and in that case I apologize<br>
&gt; in advance, but is there a way to configure the standard Centos 5<br>
&gt; syslog daemon to use more local facilities than local0 to local7?<br>
<br>
</div></div>Nope.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams &lt;<a href="mailto:ivazqueznet@gmail.com">ivazqueznet@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
<br>
PLEASE don&#39;t CC me; I&#39;m already subscribed<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>