It sounds to me like "your big beef" is that you can't run the CentOS distribution the way *you* want it run. Whether you agree or not, doesn't change the fact that CentOS *is* enterprise ready.-- and many enterprises use it. The only time there are significant delays in
No, I would just like the name and website to match the facts. I would suggest that anybody that calls centOS "enterprise-ready" might have a different concept to what an enterprise is to me. Enterprise to me is at least a 1000 users and dozens of live servers. If CentOS is only suitable for test environment then I don't really class that as enterprise-ready, either.
As for rebuilding, why would you want to rebuild CentOS? Why not do what CentOS does and get the sources directly from Red Hat and rebuild that? Obviously you must think there is still some value in the CentOS name.
I was just trying to illustrate a point, rather than actually wanting to do it.
-- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos