On Apr 25, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 22:35 -0600, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
Sigh, This is what I get for being excited and update my machine before actually looking at the RPMs....
It appears that the jfs kernel module isn't built yet for the CentOSplus kernel. So while fsck.jfs does work, I can't get Centos to actually mount my jfs partition. Of course I may have screwed something up, too.
I have this line in /etc/fstab /dev/md2 /export jfs defaults 1 1
and when I do a mount /export I get mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'
uname -a Linux fw.tarun.homeip.net 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Mon Apr 16 07:34:51 CDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any ideas?
I have one .. somehow, the JFS was not turned on in the x86 kernel ... let me respin the kernels with all the proper config files and turn on firewire.
I'll get another kernel out today for testing
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
That's funny, I actually look at that last night, but since I moved from i386 to x86_64, I only looked at the kernel-xen i386.config file in the kernel SRPM and saw that CONFIG_JFS_FS=m. Now that I look in the x86_64 kernel, it is not set. I'm going to try and rebuild as well.. just for the heck of it.
Well I changed that, and rebuilt the rpms, and no love. rpm -qpl kernel or kernel-xen don't show any jfs components. kernel-debuginfo- common shows a bunch of jfs stuff but they are just .c files. No help there.
I guess I'll see what Johnny comes up with. Probably a more serious build bug. (FWIW, I just did a rpmbuild --bb kernel-2.6.spec after install the SRPM)
Tarun