On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 13:43 -0400, Ken Price wrote:
My best tip for tuning performance:
Don't until performance becomes an issue otherwise you have no basis of determining whether performance has improved.
Let me add a second tip:
Don't tune a parameter unless you know what is does.
While probably not popular, those are very good tips.
I can give you some comparative performance info using CentOS3 and CentOS4. CentOS5 will probably give equal or slightly better performance depending on specific configurations.
Harware: 4 Dell PowerEdge 350's (2 routers, 2 NAT firewalls) PIII-850 512 Mb RAM
Bandwidth: Average 25-35Mbps Peak 80Mbps sustained for 1-2 hours 10k-25k connections
NAT Firewall: CPU usage approx 2-8%
Router: CPU usage approx 2-4%
With the above specs, I was approaching the connection threshold with 512Mb RAM (32768 = theoretical max) and beginning to drop connections. This was quickly fixed by adding an additional 512Mb RAM and adjusting the CONNTRACK_MAX accordingly.
Hope this helps. All boxes were running Keepalived for failover. Fairly straight forward routing so no software used except routing tables, IP, and IP forwarding.
Hope this helps! -Ken
Ken,
In your configuration did you tune any sysctl settings or leave with defaults?
Graham Johnston Manager, Network Services Westman Communications Group 204.571.7225 johnstong@westmancom.com